>Rumor #2 Kodak has or will introduce a new B&W film product this year.

Signature
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
But as he knew no bad language, he had called him all the names of common
objects that he could think of, and had screamed: "You lamp! You towel! You
plate!" and so on. --Sigmund Freud
> >I just ran into a semi-informed Kodak rep the other day and he told me
> >two rumors:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Already done: the T-Max films were changed (by removing their gelatin
> overcoats) when production moved to Texas.
Don't think that constitutes "new."
>>I just ran into a semi-informed Kodak rep the other day
>>and he told me
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> their gelatin
> overcoats) when production moved to Texas.
I talked with a Kodak customer service person this
morning. Kodak does not have any film production in Texas,
its all at Rochester, N.Y. I will be talking to a specialist
tomorrow about changes in B&W film but from what I already
know T-Max was produced in the color film plant for some
time before moving Tri-X and Plus-X there. The films still
are overcoated. Overcoating is important to protect the
emulsion from abrasion and also carries an anti-static
material. Also, it controls the rate of diffusion of
developer into the film. In the past the overcoatings of
T-Max 100 and T-Max 400 were adjusted so that the
development times were enough alike to allow simultaneous
development of the two. Kodak did announce that it was
improving the anti-static properties of the films. I suspect
some changes were made in the emulsion for Tri-X since there
are many reports of finer grain from the newer film. Small
changes in emulsion making are made continually during a
film's lifetime. Although Tri-X has been on the market as a
roll film for 50 years (but at least a decade longer as
sheet film) its very unlikely the current emulsion is
exactly the same as in the past, just similar in overall
properties.
I will post tomorrow if I am able to learn more specific
information.
BTW, I think Kodak has a large photofinishing plant in
Texas, perhaps this is what you were thinking of.

Signature
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Thor Lancelot Simon - 22 Nov 2004 23:44 GMT
> BTW, I think Kodak has a large photofinishing plant in
>Texas, perhaps this is what you were thinking of.
Yeah, I think I mixed up "consolidated photofinishing at" and
"consolidated film maufacturing at". There's a lot of consolidation
going on at Kodak these days (let's hope they get the efficiencies
they need to keep film in production at all!).

Signature
Thor Lancelot Simon tls@rek.tjls.com
But as he knew no bad language, he had called him all the names of common
objects that he could think of, and had screamed: "You lamp! You towel! You
plate!" and so on. --Sigmund Freud
Tom Phillips - 23 Nov 2004 03:05 GMT
> >>I just ran into a semi-informed Kodak rep the other day
> >>and he told me
[quoted text clipped - 45 lines]
> I will post tomorrow if I am able to learn more specific
> information.
I've had recent experiences with ragged edges and peeling
of the overcoating/emulsion with 100 TMX 4x5. Quite a number
of sheets, in fact, though to date Kodak representatives
I've spoken to have denied any knowledge of such a problem.
Don't know if anyone else has had this issue but maybe you
might ask whoever you talk to if he/she knows anything
about it.
> BTW, I think Kodak has a large photofinishing plant in
> Texas, perhaps this is what you were thinking of.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Richard Knoppow - 24 Nov 2004 17:31 GMT
>>>I just ran into a semi-informed Kodak rep the other day
>>>and he told me
[quoted text clipped - 43 lines]
> BTW, I think Kodak has a large photofinishing plant in
> Texas, perhaps this is what you were thinking of.
Per Don Thompson of Kodak, on the phone a few minutes
ago: All T-Max films, Tri-X, and Plus-X have overcoating.
The overcoating was changed when production was moved to
provide improved anti-scratch protection. Also these films
all now have UV filtering in the overcoating, T-Max did not
have UV filtering in the past. All of the films have added
anti-static properties partly to make it easier to
manufacture and partly to protect it from static charges
during use. Static electricity can build up on the film
during winding and result in small lightning like marks on
the film.
There is no manufacturing plant in Texas. All Kodak films
are made in Rochester, N.Y.
He did not address the question of a new film but the
fellow I talked to the other day did and said he did not
know of any such plan. However, Kodak did come out with a
new version of its B&W chromogenic film about 2 years ago
and this may be a confusion with that.

Signature
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
Andrew Koenig - 25 Nov 2004 15:18 GMT
> He did not address the question of a new film but the fellow I talked to
> the other day did and said he did not know of any such plan. However,
> Kodak did come out with a new version of its B&W chromogenic film about 2
> years ago and this may be a confusion with that.
I think they also recently dropped the version of the chromogenic film that
doesn't have the orange dye in it. Perhaps they're planning on reinstating
it?
Richard Knoppow - 27 Nov 2004 22:04 GMT
>> He did not address the question of a new film but the
>> fellow I talked to the other day did and said he did not
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> chromogenic film that doesn't have the orange dye in it.
> Perhaps they're planning on reinstating it?
AFAIK, Kodak never made such a film. Ilford does.
Kodak's chromogenic films are made to print on color paper
on "one hour" machines with minimum adjustment of the
filtration. The "professional" film has less of the orange
mask color than the amateur films, but all have some. Ilford
XP films are intended to print on B&W paper so they don't
need the mask. Kodak films will also print on B&W paper but
the mask looks like a very high base density to them and it
may throw off variable contrast filters.
I doubt if Kodak or any of the other large manufacturers
is gong to come out with any new films of any sort in the
forseeable future. For one thing none of them has a research
department any more. They are all concentrating on surviving
in a market which has largely switched to digital. It makes
no sense for them to spend research dollars on new products
which will appeal to a small and perhaps shrinking market.

Signature
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com
John - 29 Nov 2004 08:35 GMT
> AFAIK, Kodak never made such a film. Ilford does.
>Kodak's chromogenic films are made to print on color paper
>on "one hour" machines with minimum adjustment of the
>filtration. The "professional" film has less of the orange
>mask color than the amateur films, but all have some.
The T400CN had almost no color mask in the film. At least not
in the few rolls that I used. You couldn't mistake it for T-Max of
course.
Regards,
John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Charles Hohenstein - 29 Nov 2004 14:01 GMT
> > AFAIK, Kodak never made such a film. Ilford does.
> >Kodak's chromogenic films are made to print on color paper
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> in the few rolls that I used. You couldn't mistake it for T-Max of
> course.
I have trouble keeping up with these developments, so perhaps I am
incorrect, but wasn't T400CN recently replaced by a film which does have
the orange color mask? I thought that the new film was intended to
replace both T400CN and their other 400 speed chromogenic film.
Charles Hohenstein
John - 30 Nov 2004 07:56 GMT
>> The T400CN had almost no color mask in the film. At least not
>> in the few rolls that I used. You couldn't mistake it for T-Max of
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>the orange color mask? I thought that the new film was intended to
>replace both T400CN and their other 400 speed chromogenic film.
Kodak stated the following :
"Does KODAK PROFESSSIONAL BW400CN Film replace any other products in
Kodak's portfolio?
Yes. BW400CN Film is a direct replacement for KODAK PROFESSIONAL
PORTRA 400BW Film and also replaces KODAK PROFESSIONAL T400CN Film."
As usual, I have to disagree with the marketing department.
This film is NOT a replacement for the discontinued T400CN which was
easily printed on regular B-&-W materials.
Regards,
John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Michael A. Covington - 02 Dec 2004 03:55 GMT
> I doubt if Kodak or any of the other large manufacturers is gong to
> come out with any new films of any sort in the forseeable future. For one
> thing none of them has a research department any more. They are all
> concentrating on surviving in a market which has largely switched to
> digital. It makes no sense for them to spend research dollars on new
> products which will appeal to a small and perhaps shrinking market.
There's one, already in the planning stages, which I really hope comes
through. According to someone at Kodak a year or more ago, Elite Chrome 200
and E200 are soon to be reworked the same way that Elite Chrome 100 and E100
were recently reworked, to make them considerably finer-grained.
I would have expected this to happen by now, and I'm worried that Kodak is
just never going to get around to it.