Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / August 2003

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Kodak HC110 - comments, opinions and whatever

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert J. Mathes - 28 Aug 2003 14:12 GMT
I'm interested in hearing from Kodak HC110 developer users. Likes, dislikes,
good qualities, bad qualities, from those who have used it or are using it.
All comments are welcome........well, almost all are! Thanks.

bob mathes
Le Grande Raoul - 28 Aug 2003 20:18 GMT
> I'm interested in hearing from Kodak HC110 developer users. Likes, dislikes,
> good qualities, bad qualities, from those who have used it or are using it.
> All comments are welcome........well, almost all are! Thanks.

I like it.  I don't mess around with different developers and HC-110
seems to do the job for me.

I like the fact that it can be diluted different ways for different
results.  I am able to do N, N-1, N+1 and C (compensating) through the
use of different dilutions and time.

Also, it lasts.  I micx a stock solution and go from there.  I guess
I'm not much of an innovator.  I kinda just do what the Great Yellow
Father says.

BTW:  I mainly use Tri-X Pro in 120 roll film and 8x10 sheets.

Jeff
Norman Worth - 28 Aug 2003 23:54 GMT
>> I'm interested in hearing from Kodak HC110 developer users. Likes,
>> dislikes, good qualities, bad qualities, from those who have used it or
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Jeff

I haven't used it in a couple of years, but it was great stuff when I did.
The liquid concentrate is very convenient, and it lasts a long time without
deterioration.  It is slightly grainier than D-76, and it produces a little
less speed, but the tonality is excellent.  It is also quite versatile.
Aside from the fairly wide contrast range you can get from varying the
development time, you can change the dilution easily to match different
kinds of work.
Frank Pittel - 29 Aug 2003 01:26 GMT
I used it a long time ago when I was still using hp5 and fp4 (or is it
fp5?). As memory serves it's a bit grainier the D76 but gives better
tonality. I haven't used it since I started using Tmax film and
discovered the Tmax developers.

: I'm interested in hearing from Kodak HC110 developer users. Likes, dislikes,
: good qualities, bad qualities, from those who have used it or are using it.
: All comments are welcome........well, almost all are! Thanks.

: bob mathes

Signature

Keep working millions on welfare depend on you
-------------------
fwp@deepthought.com

Michael A. Covington - 29 Aug 2003 02:03 GMT
> I'm interested in hearing from Kodak HC110 developer users. Likes, dislikes,
> good qualities, bad qualities, from those who have used it or are using it.
> All comments are welcome........well, almost all are! Thanks.

www.covingtoninnovations.com/hc110 - Unofficial HC-110 resource page
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.