 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / November 2004glycin
i have been trying out various developers for paper and ansco 130 seems to work well for me. the glycin turns my solution a light brown but doesn't seem to cause ant problems with my prints so is it really a necessary additive? bill >the glycin turns my solution a light brown but doesn't seem to cause ant >problems with my prints so is it really a necessary additive? Yes. It's the developing agent. Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org Next time vote "No!" for the status quo and vote 3rd party !! F O U R M O R E F R E A K I N ' Y E A R S ! ! ! >>the glycin turns my solution a light brown but doesn't seem to cause ant >>problems with my prints so is it really a necessary additive? > > Yes. It's the developing agent. Now, how did I know you were gonna say that? >Regards, > > John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org > Next time vote "No!" for the status quo and vote 3rd party !! > F O U R M O R E F R E A K I N ' Y E A R S ! ! ! Now, how did I know you were gonna say that, too? Robert Vervoordt, MFA ... >> John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org >> Next time vote "No!" for the status quo and vote 3rd party !! [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Robert Vervoordt, MFA nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, If it looks F R E A K I N ' to people in the USA, can you imagine what it looks like to people outside? (For starters, it was deliberate and intentional, unlike the first time.) regards, --le  Signature________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: portrait@heylloyd.com net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ OT, sorry, it just burst out... > nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, > If it looks F R E A K I N ' to people in the USA, can [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > regards, > --le I claim no responsiblity :-) Didn't vote for either Bush. Oh well some of "Us" will just have to grin and bear it. Lets try and be positive about it and "HOPE" things change for the better this 4. SignatureLF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 >> nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, >> If it looks F R E A K I N ' to people in the USA, can [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Lets try and be positive about it and "HOPE" things change for >the better this 4. nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, Canada is often compared to a cat sleeping with a cow. The cat loves the cow for its warmth and snuggliness. But the cow can roll over in its sleep and never even know the cat is flat. Hence the eternal Canadian debate over how close to get, how deeply to sleep, how warm it's advisable to be, whether the cow appreciates us, whether we might get a missile shield for free of if we might have to pay, etc etc etc. We "HOPE" indeed, but now the treatment for which Canada was singled out after 9/11 seems re-validated by the election. It wasn't an aberrant politician but a majority of voters that meant to treat Canada that way. Well, kaka. I've fallen off my darkroom stool. Just remember, Lloyd says no good can come of voting for someone who pronounces it nuke-yew-lar. And Tony Blair better watch out because those Brit voters are an ornery lot. regards, --le Signature________________________________ Lloyd Erlick Portraits, Toronto. voice: 416-686-0326 email: portrait@heylloyd.com net: www.heylloyd.com ________________________________ >>> nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, >>> If it looks F R E A K I N ' to people in the USA, can [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] >net: www.heylloyd.com >________________________________ nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, I'm returning to the bosom of my nucular darkroom, never to venture off topic again. --le > We "HOPE" indeed, but now the treatment for which > Canada was singled out after 9/11 seems re-validated by > the election. It wasn't an aberrant politician but a > majority of voters that meant to treat Canada that way. Can you clarify treatment? I am not sure what you meant. Not make this a political thread but what did the US do to Canada,...excuse my ignorance of what it was. If need be email offline. SignatureLF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 >> We "HOPE" indeed, but now the treatment for which >> Canada was singled out after 9/11 seems re-validated by [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >to Canada,...excuse my ignorance of what it was. >If need be email offline. nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, Thanks, Greg, I'll email off-list. I've prepared a suitable rant for the occasion, but I can't figure out how to de-munge your email address, so could you let me know? I don't mean to start an exchange of tirades unless they're related to the darkroom. --le > nov704 from Lloyd Erlick, > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > unless they're related to the darkroom. > --le use greg(-Omit-)@gregblankphoto.com SignatureLF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918 >Thanks, Greg, I'll email off-list. I've prepared a >suitable rant for the occasion, but I can't figure out >how to de-munge your email address, so could you let me >know? I don't mean to start an exchange of tirades >unless they're related to the darkroom. >--le Hey ! Send me a copy ! Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org Next time vote "No!" for the status quo and vote 3rd party !! F O U R M O R E F R E A K I N ' Y E A R S ! ! ! >If it looks F R E A K I N ' to people in the USA, can >you imagine what it looks like to people outside? (For >starters, it was deliberate and intentional, unlike the >first time.) What it means is that the average voter has been watching way too much "reality TV" ! Smell the humis people ! Regards, John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org Please remove the "_" when replying via email |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.