Thank you for the information about filmrecue site.
On one hand, I think that (at least in my case) it is better to leave
the plates into specialist hands. It seems they don't usually process
glass plates. I have send them the information I have concerning my
plates, and I hope to have their answer soon.
On the other, I am still hesitating however: I am thinking probably is
better -or the minor evil- to put the plates in jeopardy in my own lab
(with the advice of a specialist) than to send them for a long
journey.
Ricard
> http://www.filmrescue.com/
>
> Regards,
>
> John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
> Vote "No! for the status quo. Vote 3rd party !!
Robert Vervoordt - 03 Nov 2004 16:30 GMT
>Thank you for the information about filmrecue site.
>On one hand, I think that (at least in my case) it is better to leave
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>> John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
>> Vote "No! for the status quo. Vote 3rd party !!
Since you may be doing them yourself, you might want to look into
using a Glycin stand type developer or one of the low temperature
Arctic developers once recommended by Kodak.
John, Richard?
Robert Vervoordt, MFA
John - 04 Nov 2004 08:20 GMT
>Since you may be doing them yourself, you might want to look into
>using a Glycin stand type developer or one of the low temperature
>Arctic developers once recommended by Kodak.
>
>John, Richard?
I like glycin formulas but I think in this case it's a job for
filmrescue really. Something like this should probably use
development-by-inspection which is not something to tinker with. Of
course a good stand developer for this might be Microphen 1:9.
Regards,
John S. Douglas, Photographer - http://www.puresilver.org
Next time vote "No! for the status quo and vote 3rd party !!