> Processed my first couple of rolls of 400TX (320 iso) according to Kodak's
> rotary instructions and the neg's are thinner than I would like them. By my eye
> it will take about 10 - 15% more time. What's the general accord on
> development timing of this new film.
There has been considerable speculation that due to an error in testing
or data recording/collection/editing, Kodak may have published times for
the wrong dilution of some developers with the new 400TX -- especially
HC-110, where it's widely believed the published times are closer to
correct for Dilution A than Dilution B.
My recommendation? Forget it's a "different" film, and treat it like
old TX. The difference between TX and 400TX in most developers is less
than variations you'd introduce without realizing it, like changes in
agitation, one-degree differences in temperature, etc.
And in the end, the times you get anywhere are just starting points;
I've had to cut my times for TMY by almost 50% from most published times
in order to get normal negatives. The only way to find the times that
will give *you* the negatives *you* want is to test for yourself.

Signature
I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz!
-- E. J. Fudd, 1954
Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer
Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm
Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm
Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth
and don't expect them to be perfect.