Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

cheap processing, are negatives OK ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Kevin Graham - 23 Jun 2004 19:33 GMT
I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
gives me mediocre prints.  But what about the
negatives ?  I'm expecting to make a few 8x10s
to supplement the photographer's album.   Will
the Kirkland negatives make good enlargements
or do I need to go Kodak ?  
(I want 4x6 prints too, but THEY don't have to
be that great).  

thanks
Richard Knoppow - 24 Jun 2004 01:00 GMT
> I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
> processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> thanks

   Its impossible to know for certain but my experience is
that most one-hour type places make good negatives and
terrible prints. The prints usually look foggy, perhaps due
to dirty lenses in the printer or poor chemistry. I will say
that I've gotten equally as bad prints from "pro" shops and
very good prints from a local Ritz photo who had a dedicated
technician.
   I have no idea who actually does Costco's stuff, they
might have their own plant. Most of their house name
products are very good so perhaps that carried over to their
processing.
   I would suggest trying ONE roll and hold the others back
until you see the results.

Signature

---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

John - 29 Jun 2004 14:17 GMT
>    Its impossible to know for certain but my experience is
>that most one-hour type places make good negatives and
>terrible prints. The prints usually look foggy, perhaps due
>to dirty lenses in the printer or poor chemistry.

    Cheap papers.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Nick Zentena - 29 Jun 2004 15:09 GMT
>>    Its impossible to know for certain but my experience is
>>that most one-hour type places make good negatives and
>>terrible prints. The prints usually look foggy, perhaps due
>>to dirty lenses in the printer or poor chemistry.
>
>        Cheap papers.

    I don't think those consumer papers are really that much cheaper.
They're just made to a different standard. Somebody claimed consumer papers
are designed to deal with crappy consumer kit lenses.

   Nick
John - 29 Jun 2004 20:20 GMT
>     I don't think those consumer papers are really that much cheaper.

    If we're talking about roll papers such as Kodak Edge vs. Portra, I think
the Edge would be about 35% less expensive.

> They're just made to a different standard. Somebody claimed consumer papers
> are designed to deal with crappy consumer kit lenses.

That would account for their higher contrast.

John
Gregory W Blank - 29 Jun 2004 20:49 GMT
> >>    Its impossible to know for certain but my experience is
> >>that most one-hour type places make good negatives and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
>     Nick

I guess it depends where one is going,.........John lives in TN
and the Walmarts down there are well uh...better quit while I am ahead ;-)
Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 29 Jun 2004 21:33 GMT
> I guess it depends where one is going,.........John lives in TN
> and the Walmarts down there are well uh...better quit while I am ahead ;-)

    You said the "W" word !

    I'll never forget taking my wife to my old home town in Indiana and
finding that most of the stores in the center of town had closed when a
W*Mart was opened on the edge of town. Unfortunately we had no choice but
to go there for some "necessity" (wifes sure seem to have a lot of
necessities!). As we parked the van, a (I assume) Mennonite family pulled
along side and tied of their horse and carriage. You could have nocked me
over with a feather !
Gregory W Blank - 30 Jun 2004 01:09 GMT
> > I guess it depends where one is going,.........John lives in TN
> > and the Walmarts down there are well uh...better quit while I am ahead ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> along side and tied of their horse and carriage. You could have nocked me
> over with a feather !

 I can imagine, that would seem like a rather shocking contrast. Are you
thinking of Amish though as I was almost certain Mennonites can drive
cars. In any event, to share a little additional dig at The "W" word I went there recently
hoping to get a single cheap roll of slide film,,,,nothing. I thought I remembered them
carrying it previously. It would seem they stock some things just long enough to kill the
competion then they limit your selections so your left with options you don't want.

  So I drove alot further and got the real stuff from a real camera store,......probably
better off anyway,......and my conscience is clear, as I walked out of the "W" word
without spending a dime.
Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 30 Jun 2004 01:48 GMT
>>     I'll never forget taking my wife to my old home town in Indiana and
>> finding that most of the stores in the center of town had closed when a
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>thinking of Amish though as I was almost certain Mennonites can drive
>cars.

    There seem to be varying beliefs among the Amish and
Mennonites. Don't know if the Amish would be shopping at W*Mart but I
guess anything is possible.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Nicholas O. Lindan - 30 Jun 2004 02:53 GMT
> As we parked the van [at a W*Mart in N. Indiana], a (I assume)
> Mennonite family pulled along side and tied of their horse and
> carriage. You could have nocked me over with a feather !

Probably Amish if it is horse & buggy.  If the men are dressed
in blue workshirts with no buttons, dark blue pants with suspenders,
straw hats and the women all in black then it's Amish (99% of the
time - could be the Heaven's Gate gang the other 1%).

We have lots of Amish (and Mennonites) and they shop where they
wish - there are no restrictions on commerce with the English
(that's you and me, even if you are a Botswanan).  They often
charter a van to take them where they need to go, often it's the
department store or the airport.

And there's Amish and Amish: Amish without electricity; Amish
with DC electricity only; Amish with electricity only for the milking
machine; Amish with 2-stroke lawnmowers; Amish with 4-stroke lawnmowers;
Amish with none of that, thank you; ....

Two Amish: a congregation.  Three Amish: a division.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
Remove spaces etc. to reply: n o lindan at net com dot com
psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/

Sandy - 24 Jun 2004 04:19 GMT
> I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
> processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> thanks

AS long as fresh chemicals are being used they will be fine. It's
typically the same machine they are run through, or similar. You can
send them out as a negative only order and have them printed elsewhere
or print them yourself. You can even scan the negatives and digitally
retouch them and burn a cd then have some giclee's printed.
John - 29 Jun 2004 14:29 GMT
>AS long as fresh chemicals are being used they will be fine.

    Maybe. I once used a local one-hour for some relatively
non-important films of a (non-wedding) reception. Two of the rolls had
the emulsions broiled when they went through the dryer. Lost about 6
frames total. Unrecoverable even via digital.

>It's typically the same machine they are run through, or similar.

    Safe to assume that you've never visited a pro-lab ? Similar
perhaps but not identical. Pro-labs have more monitoring equipment and
standards. The lab managers are QC for both aesthetic print quality
and machine/chemical maintenance  

>You can send them out as a negative only order and have them printed elsewhere
>or print them yourself.

    And you will find that printing RA4 is very easy but making a
series of say around 60 prints with the same color balance is not
always easy.

> You can even scan the negatives and digitally
>retouch them and burn a cd then have some giclee's printed.

    Giclee = inkjet. Why would one want an inkjet print vs. a
photograph ? One could have the digital images printed via a Frontier
printer onto Fuji papers which have a good life expectancy of at least
50 years. The images will be sharper and have better color fidelity as
well.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Michael A. Covington - 24 Jun 2004 05:50 GMT
> I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
> processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> (I want 4x6 prints too, but THEY don't have to
> be that great).

They'll PROBABLY be OK, but you risk scratches (from careless handling) and
poor washing (leading to premature fading of the negatives).
John - 29 Jun 2004 14:30 GMT
>They'll PROBABLY be OK, but you risk scratches (from careless handling) and
>poor washing (leading to premature fading of the negatives).

    About 50% of all mini-labs use film to clean their floors.
Feelin' lucky ?

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Gregory W Blank - 29 Jun 2004 15:31 GMT
> >They'll PROBABLY be OK, but you risk scratches (from careless handling) and
> >poor washing (leading to premature fading of the negatives).
>
>     About 50% of all mini-labs use film to clean their floors.
> Feelin' lucky ?

Happens in Prolabs as well, I was at a Job interview at one
local lab,....and the Lab manager was printing a customers
4x5 negative when it slipped from the carrier onto the
floor and scooted about 15 feet on a breeze,...
...stuff happens, although probably to a greater
degree in a mini lab. Those racks they hang your 35mm
on prior to printing are a tricky endeavor. I know because
I worked in a couple of mini lab's,....never dropped any customer
work though :^)
Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 30 Jun 2004 01:36 GMT
>> >They'll PROBABLY be OK, but you risk scratches (from careless handling) and
>> >poor washing (leading to premature fading of the negatives).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>...stuff happens, although probably to a greater
>degree in a mini lab.

    Probably MUCH greater. Most pro labs spool film onto a reel
and feed it through large, high volume processing tanks. When it
emerges from the drier, the film is again wound onto a reel.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Gregory W Blank - 30 Jun 2004 01:42 GMT
>     Probably MUCH greater. Most pro labs spool film onto a reel
> and feed it through large, high volume processing tanks. When it
> emerges from the drier, the film is again wound onto a reel.

I only deal with dip and dunk prolabs. But I know what your saying.
Signature

LF Website @ http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

John - 29 Jun 2004 14:16 GMT
>I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
>processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>thanks

    As in most walks of life, you get what you pay for.

    http://www.chromatics.com

    http://www.cpq.net/

    http://www.burrell.com/burrell.html

    http://www.millerslab.com/

    All are excellent labs.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
Dean Hoffman - 30 Jun 2004 15:00 GMT
There are some variables here. Many budget places have well maintained and
monitored equipment and a good staff. Some pro labs don't monitor things as
well as they should. I know of a Sam's club lab that is as well run as any
and the negatives come back perfect. (their enlagements still don't compete
with my trusted pro lab) At one time cheap places handled your negatives
like bookmarks and you were best off with a pro lab if you wanted good
enlargements. That situation has improved a lot. My advice is to test the
lab out with a few other rolls first. Be very critical of how they handle
the negatives. Dirty or scratched negs never come back from a good lab.
Also, even a cheap lab shouldn't consistantly deliver poor prints from well
exposed film.
> I have 5 rolls of wedding film.  I know cheap
> processing----Kirkland/Costco in this case----
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> thanks
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.