Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Colour paper contrast. Grades?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Nick Zentena - 01 May 2004 17:57 GMT
     B&W paper comes in different grades. Other then paper company ad
copy is there anything that tells you how high/low the contrast is on a
paper? Before you buy it. For example Kodak Portra is supposed to be low
contrast. Kodak Edge is supposed to be much higher in contrast. Is it
possible to compare the differences to the B&W grade system?

    Thanks
    Nick
Gregory W Blank - 01 May 2004 20:37 GMT
>      B&W paper comes in different grades. Other then paper company ad
> copy is there anything that tells you how high/low the contrast is on a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     Thanks
>     Nick

 Run a step wedge comparision, after its all just sensitometry.

 I made a simple guide negative a few years ago and calibrated my
printing method to it, once I got the time and printing filteration correct
for one paper emulsion I used it to judge subsequent papers and emulsion
for the same type.

I used a grey card, and "paint" color patches to get me in the realm of
reality (I think ;-)
Signature

LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank

<<<For best results expand this window at least 6" at 1152 x 768 resolution

Nick Zentena - 02 May 2004 15:23 GMT
>  Run a step wedge comparision, after its all just sensitometry.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> I used a grey card, and "paint" color patches to get me in the realm of
> reality (I think ;-)

 Thank. I'm trying to get an idea if any of the published information from
the companies objectivly provides something like paper grades.

   Nick
Jim Phelps - 02 May 2004 12:36 GMT
>   B&W paper comes in different grades. Other then paper company ad
> copy is there anything that tells you how high/low the contrast is on a
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Thanks
> Nick

Nick,

  Kodak's Endura (and earlier the III series) has what amounts to 3 grades.
Portra, which is about grade 2, Supra about grade 2 1/2 to 3 and Ultra which
is about 3 1/2 to 4. Ctein writes about this in _Post Exposure_.

Jim
Nick Zentena - 02 May 2004 15:30 GMT
>   Kodak's Endura (and earlier the III series) has what amounts to 3 grades.
> Portra, which is about grade 2, Supra about grade 2 1/2 to 3 and Ultra which
> is about 3 1/2 to 4. Ctein writes about this in _Post Exposure_.

 How would the non pro papers slot into this? When I was picking up some
chemicals last week I had to stand behind a wedding photographer and listen
to him complain about the mini-lab prints he had picked up. White brides
dress black tuxedo. You could see the woman behind the counter just wanting
to tune him out while he rambled. They didn't actually look bad.

  Nick
Jim Phelps - 02 May 2004 19:08 GMT
> >   Kodak's Endura (and earlier the III series) has what amounts to 3 grades.
> > Portra, which is about grade 2, Supra about grade 2 1/2 to 3 and Ultra which
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>    Nick

 I'm not 100% sure, but the consumer grade papers offered by the high
volume photo processors is likely the middle 'grade'.  This would give you a
somewhat higher contrast than needed.  Ctein states the Agfa paper is
actually lower in contrast than the Portra.  Never tried it or the Fuji
Crystal either.  Personal tastes is the reason.

 A pro (?) wedding photographer using a Mini-Lab?  His own fault!
Gregory W Blank - 02 May 2004 19:26 GMT
>   I'm not 100% sure, but the consumer grade papers offered by the high
> volume photo processors is likely the middle 'grade'.  This would give you a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>   A pro (?) wedding photographer using a Mini-Lab?  His own fault!

 Mini printers use so many different papers its hard to say unless you read the
backside of the paper in question. There are different flavors of mini labs mind you,...
my local camera store has an in house mini lab, they are pretty fair at what they do,
although perhaps pricey compared to some prolabs that have mini printers and offer it
as cut rate service.

They also develop slide films etc but but because they use roller transport
to process film and cannot do 4x5 I would not classify them as a true pro-lab.
Signature

LF website http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank

<<<For best results expand this window at least 6" at 1152 x 768 resolution

Nick Zentena - 02 May 2004 20:13 GMT
>  A pro (?) wedding photographer using a Mini-Lab?  His own fault!

  I just glanced at the odd print while waiting for the manager to look up
some things for me. They looked too good to be a casual snapshooter. I
wasn't paying a great deal of attention but had to wait awhile. Every so
often he would complain about detail in the dress and say some thing like
"This looks perfect on the computer. The fuji should print  it exactly
right".

     Nick
Michael Scarpitti - 02 May 2004 21:46 GMT
> >   Kodak's Endura (and earlier the III series) has what amounts to 3 grades.
> > Portra, which is about grade 2, Supra about grade 2 1/2 to 3 and Ultra which
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>    Nick

Pros: they give amateur photographers a bad name.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.