Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / April 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Waste of space

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Christopher Woodhouse - 07 Apr 2004 07:56 GMT
There is more breath wasted on derisory and inflammatory comments in this
newsgroup than there should be. A simple filter with the four letters 'scar'
shows a simple statistic. If an individual, rightly or wrongly, is not
worthy of contempt, why the continual barrage?

Please get back to on-topic discussion.

Chris Woodhouse
Michael Scarpitti - 07 Apr 2004 15:43 GMT
> There is more breath wasted on derisory and inflammatory comments in this
> newsgroup than there should be. A simple filter with the four letters 'scar'
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Chris Woodhouse

Chris:

Some people are like two-year olds. You crush their fragile egos with
cold, hard facts, and they carry on for months like crybabies...
Christopher Woodhouse - 07 Apr 2004 16:30 GMT
On 7/4/04 3:43 pm, in article
2fd2ff8c.0404070643.698fdaa3@posting.google.com, "Michael Scarpitti"
<mikescarpitti@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> There is more breath wasted on derisory and inflammatory comments in this
>> newsgroup than there should be. A simple filter with the four letters 'scar'
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Some people are like two-year olds. You crush their fragile egos with
> cold, hard facts, and they carry on for months like crybabies...

Well, if crushing fragile egos is one's type of thing. Go elsewhere. It
isn't big, it isn't clever and serves no positive purpose. Sob.
David Nebenzahl - 07 Apr 2004 16:55 GMT
On 4/6/2004 11:56 PM Christopher Woodhouse spake thus:

> There is more breath wasted on derisory and inflammatory comments in this
> newsgroup than there should be. A simple filter with the four letters 'scar'
> shows a simple statistic. If an individual, rightly or wrongly, is not
> worthy of contempt, why the continual barrage?

Well, speaking of a "waste of space", what did your little diatribe
accomplish, other than adding yet another message from the named offender?
Waste of space, indeed.

Signature

... but never have I encountered a guy who could not be bothered
to make his own case on his own show.

- Eric Alterman on his appearance on Dennis Miller's bomb of a show
on CNBC (3/17/04)

John - 07 Apr 2004 22:27 GMT
>If an individual, rightly or wrongly, is not
>worthy of contempt, why the continual barrage?

    Because some people have nothing better to do. Unfortunately
they also seem to have cameras.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
jjs - 08 Apr 2004 02:34 GMT
> There is more breath wasted on derisory and inflammatory comments in this
> newsgroup than there should be. A simple filter with the four letters 'scar'
> shows a simple statistic. [...]

woodhouse - "ignore case" put to killfile.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.