Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Developing TMax P3200

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Jevin Sweval - 29 Mar 2004 01:11 GMT
The only available developer is D76. I will be shooting at ISO 3200.
What times/temps/dilutions should I use to reduce the grain as much as
possible?

I will also be developing TMax 100 and 400 with the D76. What
times/temps/dilutions do you prefer for your personal tastes?
Mike King - 29 Mar 2004 07:12 GMT
Well, here's one man's opinion:

Grain is primarily determined by the film you shoot.  Shoot 3200--you get
grain.

Having said that you can somewhat reduce grain by choice of developer, you
already have chosen D-76, not a bad choice, it is some what finer grained
than, for example, HC-110.  The trade-off is longer processing times.

It's been my experience that agitation, etc. have a much smaller effect on
grain formation than film and developer choice.  Total wet time is reputed
to affect how much grain clumping you can get--mind you--I've never tested
this assumption, but it's in the folklore.

The Massive developer chart  http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html
suggests 14 minutes for straight D-76 at 68F/20C.  I don't think I'd try
1+1!--it's not in the chart--I imagine the developing times would be pretty
long and there might be a fall off in developer action.  (Most developers
have slightly finer grained properties at lower dilution's, D-76 straight
has more solvent action than at 1:1 with slightly lower accutance--which
will also reduce the appearance of graininess.)

D-76 is just fine for TMax 100 and 400.  (Having said that, to be completely
honest, I don't use D-76 anymore, I find it too much of a hassle to mix, I
use TMax developer and HC-110.)

--
darkroommike

----------
> The only available developer is D76. I will be shooting at ISO 3200.
> What times/temps/dilutions should I use to reduce the grain as much as
> possible?
>
> I will also be developing TMax 100 and 400 with the D76. What
> times/temps/dilutions do you prefer for your personal tastes?
G.M. Cotton - 29 Mar 2004 12:20 GMT
Now here is a worthy piece of information (especially for those of us who
were unaware of it).  Thanks Mike!

> The Massive developer chart  http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html
John - 30 Mar 2004 06:28 GMT
>The Massive developer chart  http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html
>suggests 14 minutes for straight D-76 at 68F/20C.  I don't think I'd try
>1+1!--it's not in the chart--I imagine the developing times would be pretty
>long

    20 minutes at 70F.

> and there might be a fall off in developer action.

    Nope. If anything you actually develop a slight speed increase
with developer dilution. And fall-off in developing potential is going
to be due to the dilution of the alkali and it's buffering capacity.
Borax has significant potential as far as film developers are
concerned. 1:1 might drop 0.1 pH.

> (Most developers have slightly finer grained properties at lower dilution's, D-76 straight
>has more solvent action than at 1:1 with slightly lower accutance--which
>will also reduce the appearance of graininess.)

Higher concentrations = more exposure to sulfite = finer grain.

    1:1 is still the best compromise though a 1:2 might work even
better for some.

Regards,

  John S. Douglas, Photographer -  http://www.darkroompro.com
             Please remove the "_" when replying via email
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.