Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / March 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Is selenium worth the effort

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike - 27 Feb 2004 19:56 GMT
When I desire a nice brown-toned print, I've been using Kodak Brown Toner.

However when I want strictly B&W, I don't tone at all.  Is Kodak Rapid
Selenium worth the effort?  I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
increasing the Dmax.
Jim Phelps - 27 Feb 2004 20:24 GMT
> When I desire a nice brown-toned print, I've been using Kodak Brown Toner.
>
> However when I want strictly B&W, I don't tone at all.  Is Kodak Rapid
> Selenium worth the effort?  I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
> increasing the Dmax.

Depends upon the paper and your desires.

I've realized a deeper black with Agfa MCP and MCC and like the look alot.
Looked OK on Cache FB Plus and on Ilford MG IV RC was stunning.  This is in
addition to the archival qualities it imparts on the print as well.  I think
it's worth it for the extended life it gives the print alone.

KRST is not the cheapest chemical on the dealer's shelf, but it won't break
the bank either.  Might I suggest you buy a bottle and give it a try.  If
you are really skeptical, tone one of your work prints first and see what
the result is.  It may convince you right there.  I've ended up with work
print looking better than what I thought was a good final after dunking it
in KRST (did this to make sure it was still good).
Francis A. Miniter - 27 Feb 2004 20:47 GMT
Hi Mike,

A year or two ago, I posted in this newsgroup a chart of what effects
Selenium has on what papers given various developers.  You may want to
look it up.  Some papers do not change color, some have radical changes.

A study of increase in contrast was published in Photo Techniques USA a
couple years ago.  It found that for the maximum increase in contrast, 2
- 4 minutes in selenium is desireable, and that after that there is a
slight drop off from the gains achieved.  For some papers, a  tonal
shift will already have started by 4 minutes, however.  You have to know
which is which.

Another consideration is archivability.  It is generally accepted that
2-4 minutes in a 1:9 solution of KRST does not give full protection to a
paper.  For that 10-11 minutes is probably needed.  Even at that, it
seems that some protection that used to be achievable with KRST is now
longer available because "contaminants" are no longer in the KRST.  The
"contaminants" turned out to be the principal ingredient in Kodak Brown
Toner.  This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
contaminating your KRST with  minute amount of Brown Toner - just enough
that some protective effect is had, but not enough to affect tonality in
a 2-4 minute bath.

Francis A. Miniter

>When I desire a nice brown-toned print, I've been using Kodak Brown Toner.
>
>However when I want strictly B&W, I don't tone at all.  Is Kodak Rapid
>Selenium worth the effort?  I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
>increasing the Dmax.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 27 Feb 2004 21:11 GMT
"Francis A. Miniter" <miniter@attglobalZZ.net>

> This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
> contaminating your KRST with  minute amount of Brown Toner

This used to be sold as Kodak Polytoner, no longer available,
now you have to mix your own.

Linda Butler is a current proponent of Polytoner:

http://www.lindabutlerphoto.com/

She does it to split-tone with pink highlights and brown
shadows.

Signature

Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio nolindan@ix.netcom.com
Consulting Engineer:  Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.

Dan Quinn - 28 Feb 2004 09:52 GMT
>  This leads to the interesting possibility of intentionally
> contaminating your KRST with  minute amount of Brown Toner - just
> enough that some protective effect is had, but not enough to affect
> tonality in a 2-4 minute bath.
>
> Francis A. Miniter

 You may have read the same article I read. Sodium sulfide at a
1:9,999 dilution imparted excellent protection to microfilm.
 Of course print paper is not the same thing. Even though,
it may work. Perhaps the IPI could be coaxed into testing
print paper.                                                 Dan
Msherck - 01 Mar 2004 03:27 GMT
>Is Kodak Rapid
>Selenium worth the effort?  I hear that it makes prints "glow" by
>increasing the Dmax.

Its effect depends on the dilution, paper,  and the amount of time you leave
the print in the solution.  Higher dilutions (1:20 or greater) have little or
no effect on D-max and are used to make the silvered image more permanent.
Lower dilutions (1:5 or less, usually,) can have an effect on D-max and/or
image color, but it depends on the paper.  Since you use it in light, keep an
eye on the print and pull it when you get the effect you like.  Keeping an
identical reference print (wet) to compare it to can be of some help in judging
the changes that have occurred.

Obviously, all the above are generalities:  your mileage may vary.  Experiment
and have fun!

mjs
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
C program run.  C program crash.  C programmer quit.
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.