Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / Darkroom / February 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ilford XP1 or XP2 comments

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Robert J. Mathes - 17 Feb 2004 22:59 GMT
I am hoping to get comments from anyone out there on their use of either
Ilford XP1 or XP2, both 400 ISO. Both films (XP1 I believe is no longer
manufactured and I'm not sure about XP2) yield black-and-white negatives
with images consisting of dye rather than silver and therefore utilize
standard C41 color-negative processing. Thanks!
Ralf R. Radermacher - 17 Feb 2004 23:20 GMT
> I am hoping to get comments from anyone out there on their use of either
> Ilford XP1 or XP2, both 400 ISO.

The current variety is XP-2 plus. I use lots of the stuff (as well as
the Kodak equivalent C400TN) for three main reasons:

1. The incredible exposure latitude in high-contrast scenes, e.g. indoor
shots in abandoned industrial sites with the sun falling through the
windows of an otherwise unlit building. I guess one would have to burn
holes into the stuff in order to really over-expose it.

2. The possibility to use the ICE dust masking feature of modern film
scanner wihch doesn't work with conventional b/w stock.

3. When I return home after a day of shooting, I can throw the whole
stuff, colour and b/w, into the same C-41 processor without having to
worry about different chemicals, times, agitation and all the rest of
it.

You'll find plenty of examples taken with both films, on my website.

Ralf

Signature

Ralf R. Radermacher  -  DL9KCG  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Apr. 11, 2003
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses

Gear?id ? Laoi/Garry Lee - 18 Feb 2004 06:46 GMT
Xp1 and Xp2 are

MARVELLOUS.
Jim MacKenzie - 18 Feb 2004 14:36 GMT
> 2. The possibility to use the ICE dust masking feature of modern film
> scanner wihch doesn't work with conventional b/w stock.

This is a good point I had never considered.

To throw out a disadvantage, being a dye-based negative, XP2 and similar
negatives don't have the archival stability of true black and white
negatives.

Jim
Mike - 18 Feb 2004 16:59 GMT
> To throw out a disadvantage, being a dye-based negative, XP2 and similar
> negatives don't have the archival stability of true black and white
> negatives.

How about not being able to control contrast through development?
Ralf R. Radermacher - 18 Feb 2004 17:14 GMT
> How about not being able to control contrast through development?

Not much of an issue given the enormous exposure latitude and, in my
case, the fact that I scan my negs instead of printing them
conventionally. Gives me all the contrast control I'll ever need.

Ralf

Signature

Ralf R. Radermacher  -  DL9KCG  -  Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Apr. 11, 2003
Contarex - Kiev 60 - Horizon 202 - P6 mount lenses

Norman Worth - 19 Feb 2004 04:49 GMT
I've used both of these.  Neither is available now, the current version
being XP2 Super.  They are both marvelous films, as is the current version.
Extremely fine grain, wide latitude, and excellent gradation thoughout the
range are key features.  Less mentioned is the fact that these films are
extremely easy to print with conventional black and white materials.

> I am hoping to get comments from anyone out there on their use of either
> Ilford XP1 or XP2, both 400 ISO. Both films (XP1 I believe is no longer
> manufactured and I'm not sure about XP2) yield black-and-white negatives
> with images consisting of dye rather than silver and therefore utilize
> standard C41 color-negative processing. Thanks!
Robert J. Mathes - 20 Feb 2004 02:16 GMT
My thanks to all. I greatly appreciate your replies and your experiences.

bm
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.