Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / October 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

how to stop Bill Henson looking at kids

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Borked Pseudo Mailed - 06 Oct 2008 01:08 GMT
POUR bleach in his left eye
and paint stripper in the right eye
THAT stop the sicko pervert taking
any more photos!
Jason - 06 Oct 2008 01:10 GMT
> POUR bleach in his left eye
Olde.Sault@gmail.com - 06 Oct 2008 01:40 GMT
On Oct 6, 10:08 am, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
wrote:
> POUR bleach in his left eye
> and paint stripper in the right eye
> THAT stop the sicko pervert taking
> any more photos!

Hensson probably welcomed the uproar because it gave publicity and
what better for an exhibitionist?

A photographer can be creative but calling him "artist" is stretching
it too far... He positions his models or finds a winning landscape,
adjusts the lighting, where, possible and snaps..

The camera gives a technical image.

The combination can be called a form of art but hardly comparable to
that of an artist with pencil, brush or even the humble charcoal.

O.S..
Jeßus - 06 Oct 2008 07:21 GMT
> A photographer can be creative but calling him "artist" is stretching
> it too far... He positions his models or finds a winning landscape,
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> The combination can be called a form of art but hardly comparable to
> that of an artist with pencil, brush or even the humble charcoal.

Your entire reply is a load of bollocks.
lynx - 06 Oct 2008 09:49 GMT

> On Oct 6, 10:08 am, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> The camera gives a technical image.
>  

Especially with the post production work in Photoshop, or such.

> The combination can be called a form of art but hardly comparable to
> that of an artist with pencil, brush or even the humble charcoal.
>
> O.S..
B J Foster - 06 Oct 2008 01:51 GMT
> POUR bleach in his left eye
> and paint stripper in the right eye
> THAT stop the sicko pervert taking
> any more photos!

This is the worst case of self-mutiliation-by-projection that I've seen
in aus.pol
Pete Pan - 06 Oct 2008 10:16 GMT
This guy is just a pedophile masquerading as an 'artist', and being fully
supported by his arty farty colleagues.
lynx - 06 Oct 2008 10:55 GMT

> This guy is just a pedophile masquerading as an 'artist', and being fully
> supported by his arty farty colleagues.
>
>  

Exactly. He's just a 'dirty old man'.
k - 07 Oct 2008 21:43 GMT
| > This guy is just a pedophile masquerading as an 'artist', and being fully
| > supported by his arty farty colleagues.
|
| Exactly. He's just a 'dirty old man'.

he's been accused / charged / convicted of diddling little 'uns?

news to me

..unless the Thought Police have been formed up under KRudd

...which would surprise me not a jot
Noons - 08 Oct 2008 10:45 GMT
k wrote,on my timestamp of 8/10/2008 6:43 AM:

> | > This guy is just a pedophile masquerading as an 'artist', and being
> fully
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> ...which would surprise me not a jot

bingo.  trust a w.nk to bring that as a "crime"...
k - 08 Oct 2008 11:37 GMT
| k wrote,on my timestamp of 8/10/2008 6:43 AM:
| > |
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
|
| bingo.  trust a w.nk to bring that as a "crime"...

do you ever feel sad?

you know once that was viewed by the church as a deadly sin.  off to hell
for that one!

course, a fair few priests have walked free from actually tampering with
children but they're fine members of society..

Henson's done nothing wrong.  he's never even been accused of doing anything
wrong.  looking at innocence as wrong is abhorent, but then hey - when
Target catalogue pics and school photos get posted on kiddie porn sites, I
guess Target and the schools are wrong hey?

couldn't possibly be the deviants whacking off to the pics

or the religous aealots who had a thought once and in their self loathing,
seek to crush the object of their desires
Avery - 08 Oct 2008 11:59 GMT
>| k wrote,on my timestamp of 8/10/2008 6:43 AM:
>| > |
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>Henson's done nothing wrong.  he's never even been accused of doing anything
>wrong.

Unfortunately, he has been accused.That is the entire point.  For the vast numbers of f.cking idiots
out there, that is all that is required.

> looking at innocence as wrong is abhorent, but then hey - when
>Target catalogue pics and school photos get posted on kiddie porn sites, I
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>or the religous aealots who had a thought once and in their self loathing,
>seek to crush the object of their desires
Noons - 09 Oct 2008 02:09 GMT
> | > | Exactly. He's just a 'dirty old man'.
> | >
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> or the religous aealots who had a thought once and in their self loathing,
> seek to crush the object of their desires

This whole disgusting episode only shows how
close we are to falling on fascism.
Anyone can claim whatever they want and inflate
it out of all proportion and if it sells, the media will
carry it as far as they can.  That is PRECISELY
what fascism used and did.

Henson is no more a pedo than anyone taking a
photo of a naked banana.  And the raving lunatics
frothing at the mouth are nothing but histerical
freakin maniacs who need to have their heads
bashed back to size.
clandestin_écureuil - 06 Oct 2008 17:28 GMT
> POUR bleach in his left eye
> and paint stripper in the right eye
> THAT stop the sicko pervert taking
> any more photos!

I have seen his exhibition and saw nothing erotic, indecent or perverted. I
think the only sickness involved is with those individuals who find an
innocently posed naked child to be indecent.

Secret Squirrel

Signature

Ingrid Rose

clandestin.ecureuil(insert missing symbol here)gmail.com

Pete Pan - 07 Oct 2008 00:01 GMT
>> POUR bleach in his left eye
>> and paint stripper in the right eye
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Secret Squirrel

Typical response from a bent pipe only trying to justify in their mind that
they are normal while the majority are abnormal.
SS no doubt believes those who are against adults having sex with children
are abnormal too.
Let's push the envelope a bit further.
k - 07 Oct 2008 21:53 GMT
| >> POUR bleach in his left eye
| >> and paint stripper in the right eye
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
| are abnormal too.
| Let's push the envelope a bit further.

right, lets..

the above is a typical response from a bent pipe only trying to justify in
their mind that
they are normal while the majority are abnormal.

because children / women are the root of all evil and should be bundled away
from good god fearing men so as not to torment and corrupt them..

right?

k
lynx - 08 Oct 2008 00:41 GMT

>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>  

well said!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.