 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / August 2008WOW! Canon's 50D Looks Like It Is Going To Be A Sweet Camera!!!
Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My only wish is Canon should drop that stupid print button they have on the 50D, it looks so amateurish. I'm so glad I didn't get rid of my Nikkor/EOS adapters!! <http://flickr.com/photos/fyngyrz> Rita  SignatureI reject your stupidity and substitute my own! http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com Rita Berkowitz wrote,on my timestamp of 26/08/2008 9:38 PM: > Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope > they [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > <http://flickr.com/photos/fyngyrz> Gowds! Look at those red roofs: all "plastified". I'm sure tiles look just like that... >> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I >> hope they [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > Gowds! Look at those red roofs: all "plastified". > I'm sure tiles look just like that... I'm really not convinced this is a byproduct of the dSLR/sensor as it looks more likely to be poor quality glass. I agree that the terracotta shingles should be popping to life. Let's hope that Canon introduces some improved glass to take advantage of these new bodies. Rita SignatureI reject your stupidity and substitute my own! http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com Rita Berkowitz wrote,on my timestamp of 26/08/2008 11:06 PM: >>> <http://flickr.com/photos/fyngyrz> >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > should be popping to life. Let's hope that Canon introduces some improved > glass to take advantage of these new bodies. Let's hope so. Not holding my breath at the moment, but I'll gladly wait until the first formal reviews are in. We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> saying something like: >Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope they >make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My only wish is >Canon should drop that stupid print button they have on the 50D, it looks so >amateurish. I'm so glad I didn't get rid of my Nikkor/EOS adapters!! > ><http://flickr.com/photos/fyngyrz> Looks noisy enough to me. SignatureDave >> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I >> hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > Looks noisy enough to me. It's not too bad. Granted, it doesn't look and have that natural film look that Nikon produces, but it is still acceptable for the price and targeted segment the camera was designed for. Rita SignatureI reject your stupidity and substitute my own! http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com >>> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I >>> hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > that Nikon produces, but it is still acceptable for the price and targeted > segment the camera was designed for. X posted We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember "Rita Berkowitz" <ritaberk2008@aol.com> saying something like: >> Looks noisy enough to me. > >It's not too bad. Granted, it doesn't look and have that natural film look >that Nikon produces, but it is still acceptable for the price and targeted >segment the camera was designed for. Looking at the full-size pics the noise on the front fender is a bit obtrusive - ok it's at 1600, but from the hype I was hearing I expected the 1600 performance to be better. SignatureDave >Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. Can you do anything but worship technology? SignatureRay Fischer rfischer@sonic.net >> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. > > Can you do anything but worship technology? Ray- Are you unwilling, or unable to set f-u to limit the spam?? Signaturejohn mcwilliams On 8/26/2008 4:38 AM Rita Berkowitz spake thus: > Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope they > make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My only wish is > Canon should drop that stupid print button they have on the 50D, it looks so > amateurish. I'm so glad I didn't get rid of my Nikkor/EOS adapters!! > > <http://flickr.com/photos/fyngyrz> This post is off-topic for this newsgroup, rec.photo.equipment.35mm, which is concerned with film cameras that use 35mm film, not digital cameras that look like 35mm SLRs. Please use an appropriate newsgroup for postings on digital cameras. One of the following groups would be a good place for such postings: rec.photo.digital rec.photo.digital.point+shoot rec.photo.digital.rangefinder rec.photo.digital.slr rec.photo.digital.slr-systems (Note that the list of groups available to you depends on what your ISP or news provider carries, and may differ from this list) Signature"In 1964 Barry Goldwater declared: 'Elect me president, and I will bomb the cities of Vietnam, defoliate the jungles, herd the population into concentration camps and turn the country into a wasteland.' But Lyndon Johnson said: 'No! No! No! Don't you dare do that. Let ME do it.'" - Characterization (paraphrased) of the 1964 Goldwater/Johnson presidential race by Professor Irwin Corey, "The World's Foremost Authority". Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks like the 30D, which is of course is the 20D... > Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope > they [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Rita > Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks > like the 30D, which is of course is the 20D... That seems to sum it up, but that was the old Canon. I'm being optimistic on this one and hoping they break away from tradition. Rita SignatureI reject your stupidity and substitute my own! http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com > Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks like the > 30D, which is of course is the 20D... The only two features that stand out for me compared to my 40D is the added megapixels and the individual lens focus calibration adjustment. The LCD is said to have higher resolution, but I never found the 40D lacking in that area. The 50D doesn't interest me as a much as the 7D or whatever the next full-frame model will be. On Aug 26, 10:02 pm, "Richard" <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks like > the > 30D, which is of course is the 20D... The only two features that stand out for me compared to my 40D is the added megapixels and the individual lens focus calibration adjustment. The LCD is said to have higher resolution, but I never found the 40D lacking in that area. The 50D doesn't interest me as a much as the 7D or whatever the next full-frame model will be. Nor anyone else in the market for a full-frame. The focus calibration thing is nice, like Pentax they are agreeing that there are focus issues with some lenses. Once you use a real VGA lcd, you'll hate the old ones. :-) You have right. I feel that Canon, after the 20D the only new camera have made is the 5D SignatureDimitris M > Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks like > the 30D, which is of course is the 20D... It is very sad, even with Nikon and the rest of them, features seem to be the new mantra, not improving body designs. > :-) You have right. I feel that Canon, after the 20D the only new camera > have made is the 5D >> >> Honestly, it looks like what it is, a 15 megapixel 40D, which looks like >> the 30D, which is of course is the 20D... > It is very sad, even with Nikon and the rest of them, features seem > to be the new mantra, not improving body designs. I agree! Things will be leveling off soon. At least the D700 is groundbreaking in the sense that it offers superior FF performance in a pro body at a bargain basement price. This is a great time to buy more glass. Let us all stock up on some sweet Nikkors! Rita SignatureI reject your stupidity and substitute my own! http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com > Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I hope > they [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Rita If it looks like a fish, smells like a fish and has scales... It's a hairy wombat, right? These are not 50D images. You can bet London to a brick on that! Offering up unsubstantiated EXIF data that the images doesn't have as some sort of proof it came from an experimental camera is pure genius (NOT!) Why on earth would a Chinese site offer pictures of a European countryside to (supposedly) demonstrate an experimental camera? More Canon knitting. - Pulling the wool over the eyes of the gullible and there are no more gullible than worshippers of EOS. > Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I > hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My > only wish is Canon should drop that stupid print button they have on > the 50D, it looks so amateurish. I'm so glad I didn't get rid of my > Nikkor/EOS adapters!! So let me guess; you buy a 50D, gush all about it for a couple of weeks, buy a D90, and then tell us what crap the 50D is until the next round of cameras? Signature<>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> John P Sheehy <JPS@no.komm> ><<> <>>< <>>< ><<> <>>< ><<> ><<> <>>< >> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I >> hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > buy a D90, and then tell us what crap the 50D is until the next round of > cameras? I'd say that just about sums it up, John! >>> Really! I think Canon is going to have a winner with this one. I >>> hope they make this much of an improvement on the 5D replacement. My [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >> weeks, buy a D90, and then tell us what crap the 50D is until the next >> round of cameras? > I'd say that just about sums it up, John! Except there's no need to either buy or use said cameras for "Rita" to go on and on. Signaturejohn mcwilliams |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.