 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / May 200824Mp DSLR
pics have leaked out of that Sony 24Mp Alpha-900 here: <http://masterchong.com/v2/sony-alpha/pie02008-sony-showcased-sony-alpha-dsl r-a900.html> which it turns out will have live-view like P&S's (ah the transition of technology from P&S to SLR's goes on..) a video of the sensor doing it's image stabilizing tricks: http://youtube.com/watch?v=hertVQYx-ss and Sony commercial: <http://masterchong.com/v2/sony-alpha/sony-alpha-dslr-commercial.html> their current A200 (10Mp) sells for a mere $600 AU dollars from the US, while the 14Mp is the same price as the 8Mp Canon 30D - under $USD 800 body only, so the new beast might be quite reasonably priced :) karl > pics have leaked out of that Sony 24Mp Alpha-900 > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > body > only, so the new beast might be quite reasonably priced :) Can't wait! k wrote,on my timestamp of 27/05/2008 9:15 PM: > their current A200 (10Mp) sells for a mere $600 AU dollars from the US, > while the 14Mp is the same price as the 8Mp Canon 30D - under $USD 800 body > only, so the new beast might be quite reasonably priced :) dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality stand against other maker's! the last reviews in photozone left me drooling... >k wrote,on my timestamp of 27/05/2008 9:15 PM: > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > the last reviews in photozone left me > drooling... Zeiss has been making lenses for Hasselblad for years. Not a cheap camera system ;-)  SignatureFocus | >k wrote,on my timestamp of 27/05/2008 9:15 PM: | > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] | Zeiss has been making lenses for Hasselblad for years. Not a cheap camera | system ;-) and almost every other maker too.. well, at least, the lenses have been available in other camera makers mounts - but they're just doing what a lens company should :) k > dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored > Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality > stand against other maker's! > the last reviews in photozone left me > drooling... Even with a Zeiss lens, 24Mp would be pushing it's resolution limits (or maybe beyond) I should think. Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. If you really need a genuine 24Mp+, you probably need to flog the house and buy a Hasselblad medium format digital camera (or similar), instead :-) MrT. >> dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored >> Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >maybe beyond) I should think. >Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. What is everyone into plastic surgery these days ?? Nose reductions..... Never !! >If you really need a genuine 24Mp+, you probably need to flog the house and >buy a Hasselblad medium format digital camera (or similar), instead :-) > >MrT. | > dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored | > Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] | maybe beyond) I should think. | Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. I do nose reduction more than adequately in-camera with appropriate lens selection. works for film too k >| > dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored >| > Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > >k Wow ! I see that I was mistaken..... Nose reduction IS what you do. I thought the original post was a typo..... <(:-o)) Learn something every day...... > | > dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored > | > Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I do nose reduction more than adequately in-camera with appropriate lens > selection. Everyones an infallible comedian it seems. MrT. Mr.T wrote,on my timestamp of 29/05/2008 12:57 PM: >> | > dunno about the cams, but those Sony sponsored >> | > Zeiss lenses are starting to take a quality [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Everyones an infallible comedian it seems. if only... most are just proxy comedians, ready to jump in after their "leader" with the "me too" crap, the only thing they can do anyway... > Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. Sorry to beat this dead horse (by a nose..?), but I would add that apart from appropriate choice of a portrait or longer lens, nose reduction is also assisted by keeping the person facing towards you just enough to keep their nose within the constraints of the face.. An old tip, but it all helps to keep those big noses under control.. On May 28, 5:30 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote: > Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. >Sorry to beat this dead horse (by a nose..?), but I would add that >apart from appropriate choice of a portrait or longer lens, nose >reduction is also assisted by keeping the person facing towards you >just enough to keep their nose within the constraints of the face.. >An old tip, but it all helps to keep those big noses under control.. In fact the best angle will vary depending on whether it's a very long, or very wide/flat nose. Even the degree of frontal elevation should be considered in many cases. Didn't ANYONE think I might have meant "noise", not even sure what "nose averaging" is :-) (although superimposing multiple faces has been done already, so I guess that's the same thing) MrT. >On May 28, 5:30 pm, "Mr.T" <MrT@home> wrote: >> Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >Didn't ANYONE think I might have meant "noise", not even sure what "nose >averaging" is :-) Awwww ! now I'm hurt, you obviously did'nt read my post above @ 9.43am 29/8/08 je2s34hfjr5v7bk0m5nsal4r20dkrs4o6m@4ax.com >(although superimposing multiple faces has been done already, so I guess >that's the same thing) > >MrT. > >Didn't ANYONE think I might have meant "noise", not even sure what "nose > >averaging" is :-) > > Awwww ! now I'm hurt, you obviously did'nt read my post above @ 9.43am > 29/8/08 You obviously missed my smiley too. (I hope you're still being sarcastic as well :-) MrT. > In fact the best angle will vary depending on whether it's a very long, or > very wide/flat nose. > Even the degree of frontal elevation should be considered in many cases. True enough, but I thought we were getting a bit off-topic and didn't wish to over-complificate. > Didn't ANYONE think I might have meant "noise"... Oh.. Really???? Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I CERTAINLY didn't spot it. (O: (from another Mr T.) > Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. The whole Noons family will be thrilled. Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 28/05/2008 10:17 PM: >> Should help with nose reduction/averaging though. > > The whole Noons family will be thrilled. I'd rather have a nose problem at 24 than a weight problem in the 30s... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.