>> Went to the dentist and this is what I saw on the way back:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> By the way, almost anyone could take a picture like that one.
You can say that about just any picture, can't you?
Same goes for all of Ansel Adams and Henry Cartier-Bresson pictures: anyone
could make them...
> You did notice, that I did not add any nasty comment.
>
> Roy G
Roy, you're right.
Asking for a comment on pictures *here* is asking for trouble.
From now on I'll join the rest of the group and just add fast and smart
remarks to other people's posts.
The pictures I'll save for photography forums where they do seem to like to
look at pictures without trying to out smart each other with technical bs.

Signature
Focus
TRoss - 25 May 2008 17:49 GMT
>>> Went to the dentist and this is what I saw on the way back:
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>Same goes for all of Ansel Adams and Henry Cartier-Bresson pictures: anyone
>could make them...
I know Adams wasn't the first to photograph the Jeffery Pine atop
Sentinel Dome, and I wouldn't be surprised if someone photographed the
stand of trees in Brie before Cartier-Bresson in 1968. There's no
doubt many people have duplicated those iconic images, and many more
have tried and failed.
The question for me is whether anyone *could* take a shot, but how
many people would or could duplicate it. Who here hasn't taken the
obligatory postcard snap?
So I ask you ... how many people will intentionally attempt to
duplicate "Next to the highway I saw these flamingos" or "Six white
storks in one shot. Never before seen so many in my life.."?
TR
Focus - 25 May 2008 21:57 GMT
>>>> Went to the dentist and this is what I saw on the way back:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
> duplicate "Next to the highway I saw these flamingos" or "Six white
> storks in one shot. Never before seen so many in my life.."?
To be honest: I really couldn't care less.
Maybe I'm strange, but I don't feel the need for copying anyone's photos, no
matter what the name is, no matter how pretty the picture.
That's why I really don't care for those Death Valley pictures: it's been
done a million or more times.
De gustibus non est disputandum

Signature
Focus
Wolfgang Weisselberg - 28 May 2008 15:34 GMT
> "Roy G" <roy.gibson1@virgin.net> wrote in message
>> By the way, almost anyone could take a picture like that one.
> You can say that about just any picture, can't you?
You can also say that the moon is made out of cheese, can't
you? Doesn't mean it's true. Doesn't mean you said that.
Roy didn't say what you insinuate he said.
> Same goes for all of Ansel Adams and Henry Cartier-Bresson pictures: anyone
> could make them...
Ah, the old strawman method. No, Focus, Ansel Adams and Henry
Cartier-Bresson did have full names, unlike you, so you cannot be
compared to them. (Yes, the reason is as idiotic as your logic
in your posting, so you don't need to complain.)
-Wolfgang