 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / May 2008Agent Orange Loves The D3 And Formidable 500!!
What an amazing combo! Had we this combo during the Vietnam conflict the war would have ended differently. You simply can't go wrong with Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the Formidable 500 spotting the enemy. <http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com/agent_orange.htm> Rita  SignatureStamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet Stimulus Project page. http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com > You simply can't go wrong with > Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the > Formidable 500 spotting the enemy. > > <http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com/agent_orange.htm> Did you think that was funny? What do you think of THIS, you stupid pervert? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_2x3JWWzvY I hope you get a growth on your face the size of the one on that innocent kid. That will teach you what FUN is. mike > > You simply can't go wrong with > > Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > mike That was funny, thanks for that link. Bug eye at 1.25 had me ROFL Douglas >>> You simply can't go wrong with >>> Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Douglas You are one sad man get a life >> You simply can't go wrong with >> Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > mike so what photo did YOU look at, or didn't you even bother before going off on your little rant ?? Signature"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg On 5/20/08 12:03 AM, in article MYsYj.3081$Yp.631@edtnps92, "m II" <c@in.the.hat> wrote: >> You simply can't go wrong with >> Agent Orange working the tree tops and the D3 coupled with the [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > mike Mike, you know 'Rita' is not the brightest bulb in the group. I'm pretty sure 'she' did not mean it in that manner. I would attribute the title to pure stupidity, not meanness. > On 5/20/08 12:03 AM, in article MYsYj.3081$Yp.631@edtnps92, "m II" > <c@in.the.hat> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > sure 'she' did not mean it in that manner. I would attribute the title to > pure stupidity, not meanness. Agent Orange is about as funny as Zyklon B. mike > Agent Orange is about as funny as Zyklon B. > > mike Hey Mikey, posted any shitty Nativity shots lately? m II wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 1:19 AM: >> On 5/20/08 12:03 AM, in article MYsYj.3081$Yp.631@edtnps92, "m II" >> <c@in.the.hat> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Agent Orange is about as funny as Zyklon B. very true. have you ever seen what western landmines do to children in Africa? not much fun either... at least ZyklonB and Agent Orange killed: these ones seriously mutilate, for life... > have you ever seen what western landmines > do to children in Africa? > not much fun either... > at least ZyklonB and Agent Orange killed: > these ones seriously mutilate, for life So killing is better? Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 3:31 AM: >> have you ever seen what western landmines >> do to children in Africa? [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > So killing is better? Have you ever seen the results of a landmine? And what happens to kids struck by one? Then again, what do you know of anything outside of your smallville world? > Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 3:31 AM: >> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Then again, what do you know of anything > outside of your smallville world? might do you some good to have a look at the video link that was posted to see just how badly Agent Orange disfigures entire generations, before shooting your mouth off about only landmines disfiguring people. For my money, one is just as bad as the other. Signature"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg Atheist Chaplain wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 9:12 AM: >> Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 3:31 AM: >>> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > shooting your mouth off about only landmines disfiguring people. For my > money, one is just as bad as the other. might actually help you to READ instead of spouting off? Or is that not part of your approach to life? The only one establishing any judgement of relative value is your hero, Bret-the-over-sharpened-crop. Don't bother replying, I know it'll be another stupid, off-topic tirade claiming you're a genius and everyone else is stupid. > Atheist Chaplain wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 9:12 AM: >>> Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 3:31 AM: [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > another stupid, off-topic tirade claiming > you're a genius and everyone else is stupid. as I said, it might do to have a look at the link in m II post, my only point was you seem to think Landmines are the only thing to disfigure people, that youtube video might just open your eyes about just haw disfiguring Agent Orange is in the long term. but then you just needed another excuse to have a shot at Brett, I have made no claims to being a genius of any sort, just trying to open your eyes to other possibilities when it comes to what damage ALL forms of warfare has on the indigenous population after the conflict is long gone. Maybe saying you were shooting your mouth off was a bit harsh. SignatureGod made me an atheist. Who are you to question his wisdom? Atheist Chaplain wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 11:12 PM: > as I said, it might do to have a look at the link in m II post, my only > point was you seem to think Landmines are the only thing to disfigure > people, that youtube video might just open your eyes about just haw > disfiguring Agent Orange is in the long term. I don't need my eyes open about AO. Know perfectly well what it does. > but then you just needed > another excuse to have a shot at Brett, Once again, you spout bullshit. I did not have a shot at Bret. I replid to mII. Brett is the one who had a shot at me, and he got it back in spades as usual. Why don't you READ what was posted instead of coming up with the bullshit? > I have made no claims to being a > genius of any sort, just trying to open your eyes to other possibilities > when it comes to what damage ALL forms of warfare has on the indigenous > population after the conflict is long gone. Know the possibilities of warfare very well: was born in a country undergoing a "liberation" war and spent there my youth, as a civilian. Which in Africa means: the meat in the sandwich. And later on as a military, real action, not made-for-TV wars. Real "bang" stuff. The kind where they shove a wire in your hands and tell you to go spring landmines. When you ask how, they tell you to shove the thing in the sand and feel for a "clunk". When you ask how hard, they tell you not too hard, or else you'll learn how loud a landmine really is, "and f.cking stop asking questions and get on with the job!". That's the training we got. Learned to jab reeeeal easy after a mate lost his hand, face and bits and pieces of the upper body. Capice? > Maybe saying you were > shooting your mouth off was a bit harsh. Maybe claiming I was having a shot at Brett when it was he having a shot at me could have been too much? > Atheist Chaplain wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 11:12 PM: > [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > Brett when it was he having a shot at me > could have been too much? maybe. Signature"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color." Don Hirschberg Anybody else find it amusing that so many folk could expel so much vitriol and obscenities in a quest to prove just who is the most humane? -- Jeff R. (well, it tickles me) > Anybody else find it amusing that so many folk could expel so much > vitriol and obscenities in a quest to prove just who is the most humane? All but two posts got marked as read from my filters :-) > Anybody else find it amusing that so many folk could expel so much vitriol > and obscenities in a quest to prove just who is the most humane? > > -- > Jeff R. > (well, it tickles me) care to provde an example of the "obscenities"? IN THIS THREAD? or is it just your usual one-eyed, single-minded view of the world cropping up again? >> Anybody else find it amusing that so many folk could expel so much >> vitriol [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > care to provde an example of the "obscenities"? > IN THIS THREAD? Nope. > or is it just your usual one-eyed, single-minded > view of the world cropping up again? Probably. Sucks to be me, apparently. -- Jeff R. > > care to provde an example of the "obscenities"? > > IN THIS THREAD? > > Nope. Of course not. Because you can't. And that once again demonstrates what your agenda really is, when you claim upfront they are there. > Sucks to be me, apparently. you got that one right. >> > care to provde an example of the "obscenities"? >> > IN THIS THREAD? [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > what your agenda really is, when you > claim upfront they are there. I'm sorry. I missed something here. Exactly what *is* my agenda? (This should be good) -- Jeff R. Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 1:38 PM: >>> > care to provde an example of the "obscenities"? >>> > IN THIS THREAD? [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I'm sorry. > I missed something here. No, you missed several. But mainly the one about: where is the example of "obscenities" in this thread? > Exactly what *is* my agenda? > (This should be good) to stir the pot at any cost, including the cost of any credibility on anything you claim? > Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 1:38 PM: >> I'm sorry. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > about: where is the example of "obscenities" > in this thread? Well, that would depend on what your definition of "obscenity" is. And what the meaning of "is" is. >> Exactly what *is* my agenda? >> (This should be good) > > to stir the pot at any cost, including > the cost of any credibility on anything > you claim? You think? No - I guess not. Keep trying. -- Jeff R. Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 9:04 PM: >> No, you missed several. But mainly the one >> about: where is the example of "obscenities" >> in this thread? > > Well, that would depend on what your definition of "obscenity" is. > And what the meaning of "is" is. 42 >>> Exactly what *is* my agenda? >>> (This should be good) [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Keep trying. Couldn't care less: not worth it. On 5/21/08 9:51 PM, in article f90551ec-bd28-4747-8b7e-79e307d6e686@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com, "Noons" <wizofoz2k@gmail.com> wrote: >> Anybody else find it amusing that so many folk could expel so much vitriol >> and obscenities in a quest to prove just who is the most humane? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > or is it just your usual one-eyed, single-minded > view of the world cropping up again? You need to attend an anger management class or two. George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 10:56 PM: > On 5/21/08 9:51 PM, in article > f90551ec-bd28-4747-8b7e-79e307d6e686@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com, "Noons" [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> view of the world cropping up again? > You need to attend an anger management class or two. You need to f.ck OFF aus.photo On 5/22/08 10:24 AM, in article g1437d$ta0$2@registered.motzarella.org, > George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 10:56 PM: >> [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > You need to f.ck OFF aus.photo You need someone to use your skull for a bong. Weed might mellow that attitude... George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 23/05/2008 3:11 AM: >> You need to f.ck OFF aus.photo > You need someone to use your skull for a bong. > > Weed might mellow that attitude... Would you like to try, you stupid f.ck? Nothing would please me more than watch you have a go. Mind you: make sure you bring a proper army with you, not that mob of wimps that you dropped in the middle east. On 5/23/08 7:43 PM, in article g17ob3$ec7$4@registered.motzarella.org, > George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 23/05/2008 3:11 AM: > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > not that mob of wimps that you dropped > in the middle east. Glad to see you back posting! I guess the insane asylums in Oz give weekend passes. BTW: When your skull is being eviscerated, you can't watch sh.t, retard. BBTTW: Keep the f.ck out of rec.photo.digital, you rabid slobbering sack of hammered sh.t. George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 24/05/2008 10:57 AM: > Glad to see you back posting! > I guess the insane asylums in Oz give weekend passes. Apparently fuckwits in the US can't sleep on Friday nights. > BTW: When your skull is being eviscerated, you can't watch sh.t, retard. You been watching too many movies. Try reality, for a change. > BBTTW: Keep the f.ck out of rec.photo.digital, you rabid slobbering sack of > hammered sh.t. Right after you leave aus.photo, you stupid f.ck. On 5/23/08 8:32 PM, in article g17r6c$m9q$1@registered.motzarella.org, > George Kerby wrote,on my timestamp of 24/05/2008 10:57 AM: > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Apparently fuckwits in the US can't sleep > on Friday nights. You stupid blowhard, get a decent timepiece and do try and keep up with the rest of us. >> BTW: When your skull is being eviscerated, you can't watch sh.t, retard. > > You been watching too many movies. > Try reality, for a change. Sorry, it is real. But you do not possess any analytical ability whatsoever. Sucks to be a jackass... http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=6133842 >> BBTTW: Keep the f.ck out of rec.photo.digital, you rabid slobbering sack of >> hammered sh.t. > > Right after you leave aus.photo, > you stupid f.ck. No. YOU go first, imbecile... (nothing like suffering fools on a slow day, LOL!) > >> You need to f.ck OFF aus.photo > > You need someone to use your skull for a bong. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > not that mob of wimps that you dropped > in the middle east. Better watch it, Loony Noony. He might hit you in that big honker of a nose you got. I'd smash you so hard, Sarah would feel it. Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 24/05/2008 2:07 PM: > Better watch it, Loony Noony. > He might hit you in that big honker of a nose you got. > I'd smash you so hard, Sarah would feel it. As usual: all wind, no substance. > > So killing is better? > > Have you ever seen the results of a landmine? > And what happens to kids struck by one? > Then again, what do you know of anything > outside of your smallville world? People with missing limbs can still live a good life. Dead people ...... not so much. Dumbass. Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 21/05/2008 10:28 PM: >>> So killing is better? >> Have you ever seen the results of a landmine? [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Dumbass. Why don't you try chopping off one of your legs and then go live in an African poor country? That should teach you a thing or two about your "good life", arsehole. Try to learn what the world is like, outside of your miserable little cocoon. > Why don't you try chopping off one of your > legs and then go live in an African poor > country? That should teach you a thing or > two about your "good life", arsehole. It would sure beat being dead, dumbass! Tell you what, I'll do what you say if you will off yourself. You go first. Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 1:36 AM: > It would sure beat being dead, dumbass! Would it? You don't really have a clue, do you? > Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 1:36 AM: > >> It would sure beat being dead, dumbass! > > Would it? You don't really have a clue, > do you? Uh huh. ...and you've been dead, and are therefore able to confirm or deny the hypothesis? When was the resurrection, O Lord? -- Jeff R. Jeff R. wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 9:06 PM: >> Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 22/05/2008 1:36 AM: >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > When was the resurrection, O Lord? and you and your hero have been through hell and back in the landmine fields in third world countries, and of course you know what it's like in those societies to be limbless. Yeah, that's it: you know it all, because you are from "civilized, cultured" countries. Who produce more landmines and chemical weapons than any other. Details, details... > > It would sure beat being dead, dumbass! > > Would it? You don't really have a clue, do you? Yes, it would be better to be limbless than to be dead. Even an idiot knows that. Someday, maybe you will advance to the intellectual level of idiot. >>> It would sure beat being dead, dumbass! >> Would it? You don't really have a clue, do you? > > Yes, it would be better to be limbless than to be dead. > Even an idiot knows that. Someday, maybe you will advance to the > intellectual level of idiot. I disagree. He has already Peter-Principled out several stages back. Allen Annika1980 wrote,on my timestamp of 23/05/2008 2:21 AM: > Yes, it would be better to be limbless than to be dead. > Even an idiot knows that. Someday, maybe you will advance to the > intellectual level of idiot. It only shows the narrow-minded idiotic view of the world that you redneck w.nks carry. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.