>> Now that was a cool video. The only thing that troubled me about it
>> is the lack of QA in the manufacturing steps and the careless
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> "Finger Tips" to handle the lens. Nice way to get body oils on the
> lens.
Yes, that didn't set to well with me. Makes buying a $5,000 lens really
reassuring.
> I suspect that this might be from some sort of training film done
> outside a clean room. Strange as it seems, they might not want video
> cameras taping inside a clean room. I have worked in a clean room
> before, and the regulations were quite strict on what could be brought
> in.
I'm not so sure it would be a training film done outside a clean room.
Taking a camera in a clean room can be a trivial feat if it is prepared for.
My suspicion is this, or any video, would have been done with the best
techniques and methods available to highlight their strengths. This video
did the opposite. It is what we don't see that worries me. For all we know
the tech could be salivating and dropping rice from her mouth over the lens.
Maybe a good sneeze?
Rita

Signature
Stamping out Internet stupidity one idiot at a time. Never empower the
idiot, embrace it and stimulate it. For more details go to the Usenet
Stimulus Project page.
http://ritaberk.myhosting247.com
George Kerby - 13 May 2008 14:31 GMT
On 5/12/08 7:04 PM, in article
Od-dnc3Swv7cRrXVnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@supernews.com, "Rita Berkowitz"
<ritaberk2008@aol.com> wrote:
>>> Now that was a cool video. The only thing that troubled me about it
>>> is the lack of QA in the manufacturing steps and the careless
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> It is what we don't see that worries me. For all we know
> the tech could be salivating and dropping rice from her mouth over the lens.
Projecting again?