Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / May 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Few testshots Canon 40D

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Focus - 04 May 2008 16:33 GMT
http://atlantic-diesel.com/

Comments welcome, as usual.

Signature

Focus

Marco Tedaldi - 04 May 2008 19:59 GMT
> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>
> Comments welcome, as usual.
Colors are ok...
The horse in the second Image is too dark
many of the images ar tilted.... but nice colors :-)

OK for test-shots

Marco

Signature

Dimage A2, Agfa isolette
http://flickr.com/photos/kruemi
http://profile.imageshack.us/user/kruemi/images

Focus - 04 May 2008 20:31 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> OK for test-shots

Thanks. You're right, they are tilted. I don't know why I keep doing that.
Got to pay more attention or get a screen with lines ;-)
Horse too dark? Not here.

Signature

Focus

George Kerby - 04 May 2008 21:47 GMT
On 5/4/08 2:31 PM, in article VYKdnSImouSBkoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@novis.pt,

>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Got to pay more attention or get a screen with lines ;-)
> Horse too dark? Not here.

Maybe he needed to use a fill-flash?

.

.

.

.

.

Just KIDDING!
Focus - 04 May 2008 22:31 GMT
> On 5/4/08 2:31 PM, in article VYKdnSImouSBkoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@novis.pt,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Maybe he needed to use a fill-flash?
> Just KIDDING!

LOL! At that distance in daylight. I'd like to see that flash ;-)

Signature

Focus

George Kerby - 05 May 2008 00:00 GMT
On 5/4/08 4:31 PM, in article U4adnafi9JHdtoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@novis.pt,

>> On 5/4/08 2:31 PM, in article VYKdnSImouSBkoPVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@novis.pt,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> LOL! At that distance in daylight. I'd like to see that flash ;-)

Can we say "Carbon Arc"? LOL!
Allen - 04 May 2008 23:21 GMT
>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Got to pay more attention or get a screen with lines ;-)
> Horse too dark? Not here.

It just looks like the proverbial "dark horse" to me. Actually, it looks
like a black or almost black animal with a very dark bron mane.
Allen
Focus - 04 May 2008 23:25 GMT
>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> It just looks like the proverbial "dark horse" to me. Actually, it looks
> like a black or almost black animal with a very dark bron mane.

And that's exactly what it was. A dark horse. What's the problem?

Signature

Focus

Allen - 05 May 2008 03:28 GMT
>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> And that's exactly what it was. A dark horse. What's the problem?

None here. It was someone else that apparently thinks all horses are
light colored. My family owned four horses on their ranch: one the color
of the one in your picture but with a darker mane; a brown one with a
white blaze, a mare the color of a brand new penny (hence her name:
Penny--US pennies used to be pure copper)) and her foal, exactly
identical to her mother. Horses come in about as many colors as dogs
(but eat much more).
Allen
Focus - 05 May 2008 09:37 GMT
>>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> pennies used to be pure copper)) and her foal, exactly identical to her
> mother. Horses come in about as many colors as dogs (but eat much more).

True. I did quite a lot of horseback riding myself when I was wearing a
younger man's clothes ;-)
Maybe I'll do it again sometime. Should be quite nice here in Portugal with
all the beaches, hills and rocks.

I had two Great Danes: not only the size of a small horse, but the eat as
much too ;-)

Signature

Focus

Smeeegles - 05 May 2008 10:44 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Marco

Horse l;ooked fine on my monitor.
I love the lone chapel but yes some are tilted a touch.
Was this with the kit lens?
Focus - 05 May 2008 11:03 GMT
>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I love the lone chapel but yes some are tilted a touch.
> Was this with the kit lens?

Yes, the 17-85 IS.
This chapel really stands in the middle of a crop field. No idea what they
were thinking. You see a lot of abandoned churches and chapels here. Some
one-horse-villages will have three churches!
But nothing is broken down. just abandoned. I like that: gives me plenty of
subjects to photograph.

Signature

Focus

Markus Fuenfrocken - 05 May 2008 09:33 GMT
> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
> Comments welcome, as usual.
Those are very nice examples of the capability and versatility of the much
attacked EF-S 17-85 IS (i assume you used that lens?) ... tack sharp images
and good color rendition, 4 and 5 are my favorites. Well done.

Regards,
Markus
Signature

http://www.fuenfrocken.com
Image gallery, Beef Jerky recipe

Focus - 05 May 2008 10:19 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>> Comments welcome, as usual.
> Those are very nice examples of the capability and versatility of the much
> attacked EF-S 17-85 IS (i assume you used that lens?) ... tack sharp
> images and good color rendition, 4 and 5 are my favorites. Well done.

Thanks!
For example at Fred Miranda you can read some very positive reviews of
professionals, so I guess it's not so bad.
I had the Nikon 18-135 and the 18-70, but I think this one is sharper and
more useful with the IS.
And now you get 50 euro back from Canon, so the price is excellent too.

Signature

Focus

Mr.T - 05 May 2008 15:37 GMT
> For example at Fred Miranda you can read some very positive reviews of
> professionals, so I guess it's not so bad.
> I had the Nikon 18-135 and the 18-70, but I think this one is sharper and
> more useful with the IS.
> And now you get 50 euro back from Canon, so the price is excellent too.

I got the Aus equivalent of ~200 Euro back on my 17-85IS, and I still think
it was way overpriced compared to many other lenses. Thankfully the number
of competing camera's with built in IS has caused Canon to reduce the price
premium for IS on their latest kit lenses.
Let's face it, the 17-85IS is not L series quality. If it wasn't for
Photoshop lens correction it would be almost unusable at 17mm IMO.

MrT.
Allen - 05 May 2008 15:48 GMT
>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> more useful with the IS.
> And now you get 50 euro back from Canon, so the price is excellent too.

Focus, I want to tell you that I've looked at a lot of your pictures
from Portugal. The result is that I want to go there. Let people gripe
about tilted (the easiest fix of all in photo editors), differences in
perceiving colors on their monitors vs. yours, etc, but they make me
want to go there. Please consider this a very high compliment.
Allen
Nicholas - 05 May 2008 19:18 GMT
>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>want to go there. Please consider this a very high compliment.
>Allen

How soon can you leave? ;-|

I agree with your post about Focus' photography.  He is very talented.

Nick
Focus - 05 May 2008 23:57 GMT
>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> I agree with your post about Focus' photography.  He is very talented.

Thank the both of you.
I'm a little speechless: so far nobody has made such nice complements.
You keep me going and inspire me to achieve even higher goals!
Thanks again.
If any of you want to come to Portugal, I'll be happy to get you settled and
show you around. It will be a time you'll never forget or regret. (Should it
be OR or NOR?).

Signature

Focus

m II - 06 May 2008 03:19 GMT
> (Should it
> be OR or NOR?).

'neither here nor there'

Means whatever the object,  it is NOT at either place. Note that the
'nor' is used with a negative 'neither'.

'either here OR there'

Means the object IS at one location or the other.

Sorry for my crude explanation.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nor

mike
Allen - 06 May 2008 03:44 GMT
>>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
> show you around. It will be a time you'll never forget or regret. (Should it
> be OR or NOR?).

Unfortunately, I am no longer able to travel, thanks to arthritis and
back problems. But that doesn't mean that I wouldn't _like_ to.
Allen
Focus - 06 May 2008 10:16 GMT
>>>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> problems. But that doesn't mean that I wouldn't _like_ to.
> Allen

Sorry to hear that, Allen.
Back problems I've had since I was 29 when I lifted a billiard table and
twisted my back; from time to time it's back and I can hardly move. And I
got rheumatism, but here in Portugal it's much better. Specially when it's
very warm. I lived in Holland before: very wet and cold. I hardly came out
of the house anymore and pain was my only buddy.
It sometimes seems unfair: as we get older and wiser (well, at least we
should ;-), we can't do what we want to anymore. The trick is to see what we
*can do*, not what we can't and get the most out of it. After all, it's just
one big school; a lifelong term of learning.

Signature

Focus

OldBoy - 05 May 2008 10:51 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>> Comments welcome, as usual.
> Those are very nice examples of the capability and versatility of the much
> attacked EF-S 17-85 IS (i assume you used that lens?) ... tack sharp
> images and good color rendition, 4 and 5 are my favorites. Well done.

The first EF-S 17-85 batch had some flaws (I got one then).
Perfect lens above 23mm, around f/8 and good working IS.
^Tems^ - 08 May 2008 08:50 GMT
> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>
> Comments welcome, as usual.

And you have the hide to put crap on someone elses photos.
Focus - 08 May 2008 09:35 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>
>> Comments welcome, as usual.
>
> And you have the hide to put crap on someone elses photos.

If you don't know what you're talking about: shut up..

Signature

Focus

^Tems^ - 09 May 2008 02:25 GMT
>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> If you don't know what you're talking about: shut up..

f.ck you, you want to bring your crap to aus.photo we will say what we like.

He has done nothing wrong in aus.photo. He has posted some great stuff
unlike your out of focus sh.t. Your name is so ironic.

You don't us to comment on your crap remove aus.photo from your attack
posts.
Focus - 10 May 2008 10:42 GMT
>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> You don't us to comment on your crap remove aus.photo from your attack
> posts.

*YOU* are not * aus.photo
If you don't like it, don't look. Simple, isn't it?

So where are your fantastic pictures?

Signature

Focus

Dicasa Photography - 10 May 2008 10:55 GMT
> So where are your fantastic pictures?

Here:

www.dicasa.nl
And here:
http://gallery.zoom.nl/user/39306/dicasa/myimages/

Now its you're turn to show
some.......................hahahahahahahahahahaha.
Keep on the testingshoots
Focus..................................hihihihihihi. Someday you learn.
Someday..........................

--
www.dicasa.nl
Focus - 10 May 2008 21:22 GMT
>> So where are your fantastic pictures?
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Focus..................................hihihihihihi. Someday you learn.
> Someday..........................

Yes Roger, you are the best......

Of course: there can only be one "proffesional", LOL!

Signature

Focus

Dicasa Photography - 10 May 2008 21:30 GMT
>>> So where are your fantastic pictures?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Yes Roger, you are the best......

No Focus, not the best..................................better than you.
Better than you is not so difficult.............lol.

You're words Focus:

"Testing, testing................1,2,3. sh.t: poor colors, poor sharpness.
sh.t cam.
The A350 butchered the Ferrari.............lol. sh.t Sony, they have a lot
to learn".

Hahahaha. I crack myself.
--
www.dicasa.nl
Alienjones - 10 May 2008 11:58 GMT
>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> f.ck you, you want to bring your crap to aus.photo we will say what we
> like.

Hey Stevo...
Who died and left you as spokesperson for 25 million people?
^Tems^ - 13 May 2008 01:44 GMT
>>>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Hey Stevo...
> Who died and left you as spokesperson for 25 million people?

Sorry Dog, I forgot that is your job but I still don't see where I
mention being a spokesperson for 25m.

Well done on making a post without a spelling mistake
C J Campbell - 09 May 2008 04:20 GMT
> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>
> Comments welcome, as usual.

The most interesting shot was the man at the sewing machine.

It still seems to me that I can tell exactly how tall you are by
looking at your pictures. :-) Even test shots do not have to all be in
landscape format taken at eye level by a standing photographer.

The 40D should work out well for you.
Signature

Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

Paul Furman - 09 May 2008 05:54 GMT
>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>
>> Comments welcome, as usual.
>
> The most interesting shot was the man at the sewing machine.

Agreed.

> It still seems to me that I can tell exactly how tall you are by looking
> at your pictures. :-) Even test shots do not have to all be in landscape
> format taken at eye level by a standing photographer.

The wheat & flowers shot was from a crouching position, appropriately.

> The 40D should work out well for you.

Signature

Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

Chris Malcolm - 09 May 2008 10:06 GMT
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:

>>> http://atlantic-diesel.com/
>>>
>>> Comments welcome, as usual.
>>
>> The most interesting shot was the man at the sewing machine.

> Agreed.

>> It still seems to me that I can tell exactly how tall you are by looking
>> at your pictures. :-) Even test shots do not have to all be in landscape
>> format taken at eye level by a standing photographer.

> The wheat & flowers shot was from a crouching position, appropriately.

I guess you guys are talking about those old fashioned cameras you
have to hold up to your eye :-)

Signature

Chris Malcolm        cam@infirmatics.ed.ac.uk              DoD #205
IPAB,  Informatics,  JCMB, King's Buildings, Edinburgh, EH9 3JZ, UK
[http://www.dai.ed.ac.uk/homes/cam/]

C J Campbell - 10 May 2008 13:04 GMT
> In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Paul Furman <paul-@-edgehill.net> wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> I guess you guys are talking about those old fashioned cameras you
> have to hold up to your eye :-)

Actually, I have become pretty good at aiming a camera without looking
through the viewfinder. When I get down on my knees or lower I might
not be able to get back up again! Very annoying.
Signature

Waddling Eagle
World Famous Flight Instructor

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.