Don't think there is any significant difference between this and the
equivalent sigma ex version. I have the ex sigma version and am very happy
with it.
Cheers
Ron
>>> Does anyone have or used Nikon 80-400 lens?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=115&sort=7&cat=28&page=2
> The rating's not exactly stellar for a lens of that price, though.
Pete D - 11 Nov 2007 19:27 GMT
The Sigma is VR? I would call that fairly significant.
You may find for a lot less the Bigma may do what you want anyway.
> Don't think there is any significant difference between this and the
> equivalent sigma ex version. I have the ex sigma version and am very happy
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>> http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=115&sort=7&cat=28&page=2
>> The rating's not exactly stellar for a lens of that price, though.
Rob - 11 Nov 2007 19:41 GMT
> Don't think there is any significant difference between this and the
> equivalent sigma ex version. I have the ex sigma version and am very happy
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ron
the 80-400 doesn't seem to be listed either in sydney, or Ritz in the
states, B&H have it at $999us, wonder if its been discontinued??
Reviews on the Nikon aint spectacular and maybe worth considering the
Sigma - just finding on ex Sydney.
>>>>Does anyone have or used Nikon 80-400 lens?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=115&sort=7&cat=28&page=2
>>The rating's not exactly stellar for a lens of that price, though.