About rights and idiots and this group

Thread view:

Enable EMail Alerts

Start New Thread

Thread rating:

D...Mac - 07 Nov 2007 12:50 GMT

There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
disliking to. Oddly enough 2 of these zealots have never demonstrated
any photographic skills or posted any helpful replies to any posts.
They haven't made any original, on-topic posts either.

Demanding "courtesy" while providing none themselves, is a good
example of bigotry.

Here's my statement to them all:

If you don't defend your rights, pretty soon you'll have none... This
is what causes war. More lives are lost and more money wasted
defending principals and rights than ever is needed to live in
harmony.
Question:
Are those who defend their rights the bad buggers or are those who try
to take them away the nasty bastards?

Aus Photo is a photograph related group. I post on-topic messages. I
have a right to do this. I also have a right to publicize the
circumstances relating to those village idiots who think it's "cute"
to steal my photos and poke fun at me by altering them and pasting
pornographic images into them.

So listen up Atheist Chaplain, Vintage Monk and whoever else has the
notion they can apply pressure to me to somehow "piss off" so they can
do what they want me not to... Piss off yourself! I've been a part of
this group since 1998. I've seen the likes of you come and go.
Destroying in the process what you came to enjoy.

This news group will survive your antics. It will survive all the sh.t
coming out of Chattanooga and it will survive Mark Thomas and his self
appointed defender of his own opinion. Live with the knowledge this is
a group. If you don't like group interaction and the inevitable
"oddball" it produces, go start your own group. Don't try and destroy
this one for your own personal entertainment.

Douglas

Reply to this Message

Harold Hughes - Activity Director (The Buttery) - 07 Nov 2007 13:30 GMT

> There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
> deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Douglas

For those that skip the BS D.Mac posted he said
"A group of new people have joined the group so I have to pretend to be
a victim. But this post proves that I like to provoke. I say I make on
topic comments but as with this and the next I am very off topic. All
the regulars now have me killfiled so I have changed my name and email
again so they see this and also feel sorry for me. I am a c.nt please
killfile me right away."

It is such a shame that wasn't Ryadia burning down on the news and you
trapped on board.

Reply to this Message

The Vintage Monk - 07 Nov 2007 22:01 GMT

> There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
> deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
[quoted text clipped - 35 lines]
>
> Douglas

As usenets biggest bully wrote
"Ho hum... Same sh.t from the same fool but on a different day."

Reply to this Message

The Vintage Monk - 07 Nov 2007 22:51 GMT

> There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
> deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
> disliking to. Oddly enough 2 of these zealots have never demonstrated
> any photographic skills or posted any helpful replies to any posts.
> They haven't made any original, on-topic posts either.

Who would these two be?

> Demanding "courtesy" while providing none themselves, is a good
> example of bigotry.

Demanding attention is a good example of a man that had a loveless
childhood.

> Here's my statement to them all:
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Are those who defend their rights the bad buggers or are those who try
> to take them away the nasty bastards?

I think a better question is:
Why the hell do you have to make up so many lies?

> Aus Photo is a photograph related group. I post on-topic messages.

Changing a topic into a make believe "I was bullied" fantasy does not
make it on topic.

I

> have a right to do this.

And I have a right to call you a fuckwit.

I also have a right to publicize the

> circumstances relating to those village idiots who think it's "cute"
> to steal my photos and poke fun at me by altering them and pasting
> pornographic images into them.

Oh here we go with the picture stealing again, how f.cking long ago was
it Dog? FFS move on. You seem to enjoy living in the past.

> So listen up Atheist Chaplain, Vintage Monk and whoever else has the
> notion they can apply pressure to me to somehow "piss off" so they can
> do what they want me not to... Piss off yourself!

Well stop changing your name so we can killfile you and never see your
crap again. It is that simple Dog. You bring this all on yourself you
big skirt.

I've been a part of

> this group since 1998.

Geez now let me work this out, you have been here 9 years, you average 5
names a week.
That is over 2300 names you would have used in that 9 years. Do you
have a baby name book or do the voices tell you what name to use?

I've seen the likes of you come and go.

Luckily I have never ever seen the likes of you. I really didn't think
there could be anyone in the world so messed up in the head.

> Destroying in the process what you came to enjoy.
>
> This news group will survive your antics. It will survive all the sh.t
> coming out of Chattanooga and it will survive Mark Thomas and his self
> appointed defender of his own opinion.

Are you a Labor politician? They are very similar to you in that they
can have an opinion but no one else can.
In the last 2 months the only time any of these two have 'attacked' you
is when you start it.

As far as I see it as long as you have the annika website up you are
inviting potshots and potshots are what you are going to get.

Live with the knowledge this is

> a group. If you don't like group interaction and the inevitable
> "oddball" it produces, go start your own group.

As I have mentioned, if you stop changing your name you would remain
killfiled we would never hear from you again.

And don't come the I have different computers crap, you claim to be
able to master SEO and have created a better enlargement program than
Adobe can come up with but you can't put the same name and email address
into 'all' your computers.

Don't try and destroy

> this one for your own personal entertainment.

Why did you post the same message twice with different subjects?
You always go on about 'the rules' of usenet where was the OT or (OT)

Thats right Doggy, rules for you and different rules for everyone else.

> Douglas
> Usenets biggest bully

True

Reply to this Message

Atheist Chaplain - 08 Nov 2007 02:29 GMT

> There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
> deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
> disliking to.

Actualy the very clear pattern is of you trying to intimidate and bully
anoyone that has the hide to stand up to you, your creation of web pages
designed to defame and ridecule some of those people is clear evidence of
that Doug!

Oddly enough 2 of these zealots have never demonstrated

> any photographic skills or posted any helpful replies to any posts.
> They haven't made any original, on-topic posts either.

Like this one of yours Doug ??

Here is an on topic photo post for you Douggie, its a bird shot, sadly all I
had handy was my trusty phone cam.
http://tinyurl.com/yv88ds
I don't quite think I got the rule of thirds right, but then again it was a
rushed job........

> Demanding "courtesy" while providing none themselves, is a good
> example of bigotry.

I never demanded anything, if you think someone asking for some common
decency and useing terms like "please" and thank you" is demanding, then you
realy need to go back to primary school.

> Here's my statement to them all:

*RANT WARNING* *RANT WARNING* *RANT WARNING*

> If you don't defend your rights, pretty soon you'll have none... This
> is what causes war. More lives are lost and more money wasted
> defending principals and rights than ever is needed to live in
> harmony.

and this relates to Usenet how exactly ??

> Question:
> Are those who defend their rights the bad buggers or are those who try
> to take them away the nasty bastards?

Answer: Those that demand they have all the rights yet deny everyone else
the same are the nasty bastards. You seem to slot into that catagory like a
greased finger up a bum.

> Aus Photo is a photograph related group. I post on-topic messages. I
> have a right to do this. I also have a right to publicize the
> circumstances relating to those village idiots who think it's "cute"
> to steal my photos and poke fun at me by altering them and pasting
> pornographic images into them.

are you trying to imply that I have stolen any of your images and the
altered them with pornography ??

> So listen up Atheist Chaplain, Vintage Monk and whoever else has the
> notion they can apply pressure to me to somehow "piss off" so they can
> do what they want me not to... Piss off yourself!

NO!

I've been a part of

> this group since 1998. I've seen the likes of you come and go.
> Destroying in the process what you came to enjoy.

So this somehow makes you the boss of the news group??
Age does not imply ownership or wisdom, your living proof of that Doug

> This news group will survive your antics.

But will it survive yours?

It will survive all the sh.t

> coming out of Chattanooga and it will survive Mark Thomas and his self
> appointed defender of his own opinion.

Did you destroy that part of your brain that checks your grammer, or was
your BP so high when you wrote this that the drool shorted out your keyboard

Live with the knowledge this is

> a group.

One I am just as entitled to participate in, if you dont like it, I recomend
getting a kill filter that actualy works

If you don't like group interaction and the inevitable

> "oddball" it produces, go start your own group.

Sage advice, why dont YOU live by it??

Don't try and destroy

> this one for your own personal entertainment.

I get no entertainment from reading and replying to your almost daily rants,
but that wont stop me from pointing out your bully boy tactics every time I
see them.

> Douglas

Signature

"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg

Reply to this Message

El Barto - 08 Nov 2007 23:25 GMT

>> There is a very clear pattern in aus photo of three people
>> deliberately trying to prevent postings here from those they take a
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
>
>> Douglas

I see Douglas is trying to stir the pot again. Good retort AC, well
worded and all your points in reply to Douglas are well made and polite :)

Bart

Reply to this Message