Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / September 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Fong rip off...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
D_Mac - 26 Sep 2007 04:16 GMT
How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?

Well here they are on sale for $2 each! Just about their true worth!
Exposed with that masterpiece of a camera... The FZ 50 Panasonic!

http://www.ryadia.com/PFF/Bret's-beaut-flash.htm

Doug
El Barto - 26 Sep 2007 05:56 GMT
> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Doug

so in your ignorance you bought the cheap "Lambency Diffuser" imitation
and then have the hide to say that the Fong is a rip-off, again you show
your true colours by comparing apples to oranges.
I wonder if Gary Fong and his legal people know your making false claims
about HIS product by saying it is a cheap Chinese knockoff.

Oh thats right, they do :-)
Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D_Mac - 26 Sep 2007 08:52 GMT
> > How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> of them?
> Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Totally hopeless people like you think the "Genuine" Fong diffuser is
somehow worth $42 more than it cost to make. By anyone's standard such
profit margins are a "Rip off". These Chinese versions are not exact
replicas so there is no copyright infringement and Fong wasn't
original enough in his design for it to be patentable. What you are
seeing here is the culmination of YOUR freedom on the Internet.

The thing is no better and in many ways worse than using a sheet of
tissue or tracing paper to scatter the light. You can achieve the same
effect by using the bottom of a bleach bottle.

Gary Fong had a good old time making major bucks for a while. Now he's
got some competition Whoopie!

I started selling wedding photography packages on eBay when no one
else did. As soon as the wannabes saw my sales figures they jumped in
and now no one makes enough out of it. Big deal.

The profits in this world are made by innovators, not imitators. By
the time the imitators get their act together, a real innovator has
made his money and innovated something else. You can choose to
consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
do have a name, don't you? Why are you hiding it?

Doug
El Barto - 26 Sep 2007 10:05 GMT
>>> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>>> Well here they are on sale for $2 each! Just about their true worth!
[quoted text clipped - 39 lines]
>
> Doug

Well no actually whats happening here Doug is that you have again
created a post where you are comparing a product from a reputable
professional, with a cheap Chinese ripoff that looks like a cheap
plastic throw away drink cup with a hole cut in the bottom for the flash
"Adapter" and a plastic lid. Side by side the Fong diffuser is much
better built, and made from obviously higher grade components and
without a doubt works much better.
Then you go and post how the "Gary Fong" is ripping everyone off and in
essence your saying the cheapie IS the Gary Fong with one simple
sentence "How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
 Well here they are on sale for $2 each!" when clearly they are NOT the
Gary Fong diffuser, squirm as you might, the simple fact is you are
defaming a reputable Professional Photographer by your willful ignorance
and blatant lies.
And Yes I DID report this to Gary Fong via email today, complete with
full headers from your original message, including the link to your
defamatory web page, whether anything comes of this, I dont know, but
I'm sure that if more posters started to report your on line defamation
to the companies that you are defaming with your obvious and poorly
executed attempts at manipulating images to show them in a poor light,
then I'm sure that by the time these companies Legal departments get
through with you, you will be back to shooting snotty 3 year olds at
Christmas time with your trusty box brownie, because thats all you will
have left.
Noons - 26 Sep 2007 14:24 GMT
> then I'm sure that by the time these companies Legal departments get
> through with you,

ooooo, I'm sure the "companies Legal departments", whatwever
the f.ck that means, will bo soooooo busy following up on
your crap!
So let me see: is it Gary Fong's company Legal department?
sh.t, must be a wide world out there when someone selling
a paper cup can aford a  "Legal department".
What you also need to do is extract your head out of
your arse, it's in risk of coming up through your belly button...
Noons - 26 Sep 2007 14:19 GMT
> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
> do have a name, don't you? Why are you hiding it?

His name is Paul and he posts from a
Californican address:
24.224.221.97
Noons - 26 Sep 2007 15:27 GMT
> > consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
> > in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Californican address:
> 24.224.221.97

meant to say Canadian, apologies.
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 02:43 GMT
>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Californican address:
> 24.224.221.97

WOW, not even close, but please keep trying Nuno, you might even get the
right continent eventually.

As I said, I'm posting from NSW, you know, the same state your in, I’m
just on the other side of the Blue Mtns :-)
Its a nice sunny morning here, though close to midday, I expect its the
Same in Sydney as well, so you have a lovely day :-)

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D-Mac - 27 Sep 2007 03:22 GMT
>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Its a nice sunny morning here, though close to midday, I expect its the
> Same in Sydney as well, so you have a lovely day :-)

I have a question for you Bart...
Why is it when I search on your name all I find is offensive and degrading
comments in a variety of groups? Is it that you are a nasty prick or is that
you'd like to be one?

Doug
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 04:14 GMT
>>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Doug

Here is a clue for the clueless, try searching by email address, from
memory there are several El Bartos on usenet.
Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see he
is able to go around telling everyone to "Get f.cked" all over these
groups, yet not a peep from you about his swearing on a public forum and
reporting him to HIS ISP, why is it that you have one rule for most, and
another for your lap-dog ?
Is it because if the pair of you can drive away the knowlegable
photographers, you can then spew your drivel without fear of being shown
up for the clueless little weasel you realy are ??

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D-Mac - 27 Sep 2007 05:10 GMT
>>>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> photographers, you can then spew your drivel without fear of being shown
> up for the clueless little weasel you realy are ??

I don't think you're paying attention here. Had you been doing so, you'd
know I already suggested to Noons his behaviour was getting into a dangerous
area. The fact others were prodding him has escaped you, has it?

Or is it just because he hasn't targeted me with defamatory lies and
therefore I have no need to retaliate that bothers you? If you and those
with your mental issues pulled your heads in, these groups would be a much
better place to spend a little time.

As it is, you and people with your mentality are the ones starting the
trouble. Don't get your nose out of joint when people who expect some common
courtesy, get agro enough to let fly with a few adjectives when socio
economically disadvantaged w.nkers can't control their primal urges.

Don't be surprised either to discover when all your posts are directed at a
particular person and they are all inside the definition of a bully's posts
or fit the description of stalker, you get put in for it.

It's bad enough that small time crooks are turning the Internet into a crime
scene without weak minded individuals turning Usenet into a playing field
for stalking and bullying.

Doug
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 06:01 GMT
>>>>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>>>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are. You
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> know I already suggested to Noons his behaviour was getting into a dangerous
> area. The fact others were prodding him has escaped you, has it?

No one prodded him, he went of on his tirade without assistance from
anyone, all you did was told him to calm down, no mention was made of
his swearing or obscenities, that little fact has not escaped the
attention of the regulars

>  Or is it just because he hasn't targeted me with defamatory lies and
> therefore I have no need to retaliate that bothers you? If you and those
> with your mental issues pulled your heads in, these groups would be a much
> better place to spend a little time.

the current one doing the defamation on this group is you Doug, or has
that fact escaped you? and the one making most of the posts intended to
incite negative comment (something you seem to thrive on) is you, the
current thread is just one example and then there is "D-MAC'S LATEST
DSLR VS. P&S TEST !" another blatant false comparison on your part, I
believe there are still a lot of unanswered questions you have
studiously avoided in there. Admittedly you have started a few threads
showcasing your OK photography skills

> As it is, you and people with your mentality are the ones starting the
> trouble. Don't get your nose out of joint when people who expect some common
> courtesy, get agro enough to let fly with a few adjectives when socio
> economically disadvantaged w.nkers can't control their primal urges.

I don't start the trouble Doug, but I will do my damnedest to make sure
that yours and Noons doesn't go unnoticed.
I'm Socio economically disadvantaged now!! I will remember to let my
Accountant know the next time I see her, or is that a dig at where I
CHOOSE to live Doug ??

> Don't be surprised either to discover when all your posts are directed at a
> particular person and they are all inside the definition of a bully's posts
> or fit the description of stalker, you get put in for it.

I'm sure your well versed with the definition of a Bully Doug, after all
you are the poster child for that particular genre

> It's bad enough that small time crooks are turning the Internet into a crime
> scene without weak minded individuals turning Usenet into a playing field
> for stalking and bullying.
>
> Doug

yet you of all people have the hide to ask for a persons name on usenet,
when everyone knows full well that you will, at the first opportunity
turn that knowledge against them because they may have said something
you don't like about your work, work I might add that YOU are putting
out there for criticism, yet when it is forthcoming and not to your
liking, you threaten legal retribution and go all postal with threats to
ISP's and State and Federal police. do you see the double standards
there Doug, I suppose not, because if you did, you might see why your in
so many kill files.

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D-Mac - 27 Sep 2007 06:53 GMT
>>>>>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>>>>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are.
[quoted text clipped - 86 lines]
> Federal police. do you see the double standards there Doug, I suppose not,
> because if you did, you might see why your in so many kill files.

That's not exactly correct Bart.
I complied with every law and regulation in existence when I became part of
the Internet community. I started out with the belief if I followed the
legal requirements of every Government department in Australia, I'd be
"doing the right thing". That didn't turn out to be the "right thing" for
me... just every lunatic on the planet who saw me as a soft target.

The day I went on-line, I published full disclosure of who the directors of
the ISP company I'd floated were, as required by law. Ever since then I've
had as my constant companion, I plethora of Federal Government investigators
looking for information about my clients and their off-shore dealings. The
shonky ISPs who never bothered to register escaped without any of that crap.

When I floated Technology Australia Pty Ltd to develop and market my
enlargement algorithm, Linux software and digital photo printing service, I
complied with Australian law and disclosed the names of the directors of the
company where ever it was required. It is required to be put on the web site
of every Australian business doing business or advertising on the Internet.

Ever since then, I've had as my constant troll One cretin calling himself
Mark Thomas now but earlier using the name of Charles Stevens who despite my
years of warnings, still persists in posting defamation and lies about me
and my business. When he gets caught out, there's no apology just silence
until the next time he goes ballistic. He's done that a little too often now
and got my full attention.

Anyone in the world who takes exception to me fighting fire with fire, can
(as some have) complain to my ISP, The AFP and the Queensland State Police.
All those people have full disclosure from me, even though not all agree
with how I am handling the situation.

At the end of the day I've had enough of people who hid behind forged and
false identities, posting through anonymous servers and spreading lies about
me and defaming my clients. I'm fed up with the interference to my business
and my participation in newsgroups.

I'm not now of the opinion that giving back as good as they dish out is
likely to achieve any sort of outcome likely to keep me seen as the innocent
party. Now, I simply report the people who can't display on Usenet, the
common courtesy they expect from people in real life... I lodge complaints
to the authorities most able to take action against them.

It works sometimes, sometimes it doesn't but one thing I can assure you
absolutely... If you never lie about me, post derogatory remarks about me
and address me with a basic level of courtesy expected in day to day
community existence, you'll never need to concern yourself with the avenues
I use to ensure I get responsible communication from people.

You and anyone else are free to make whatever comment you feel like about my
photos. You are not free to expect me to display them in a way that allows
every tom dick and harry to download them for their own entertainment.

If you want to look at my pictures, see them the way I am prepared to show
them. If you want to pass comment, do so without insults and without
attempting to lit up a flame war... Is this expecting too much?

Doug
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 07:50 GMT
>>>>>>>> consider me ignorant if you want - that's your choice but to do that
>>>>>>>> in confusion like you are here is your mistake... Whoever you are.
[quoted text clipped - 89 lines]
> I complied with every law and regulation in existence when I became part of
> the Internet community.

how soon we forget.
"How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?

Well here they are on sale for $2 each!"

I have it on good authority that this is called "Defamation"
last time I looked, that was an offence........

pretty much makes the rest of your rant a waste of time.

I started out with the belief if I followed the
> legal requirements of every Government department in Australia, I'd be
> "doing the right thing". That didn't turn out to be the "right thing" for
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> All those people have full disclosure from me, even though not all agree
> with how I am handling the situation.

I have no qualms with you protecting your copy write, but do you think
that a Judge is going to be impressed with your own defamatory web
sites, http://www.julianabbot.com/legalactions/ has a whole front page
that is essentially accusing Mark Thomas of doing all the things you
apparently hate yet I see not one single "allegedly" or "was reported to
have" on the entire front page, and until an actual legal judgement has
been made, you are in fact defaming Mark Thomas. Again I point out your
double standards. A third year law student would have you begging for
mercy as the sheriff's were dragging all your possessions out to the
truck so they could be sold off to pay Mark for his judgement against you.
Do you see why no one here believes a word you say??

> At the end of the day I've had enough of people who hid behind forged and
> false identities, posting through anonymous servers and spreading lies about
> me and defaming my clients. I'm fed up with the interference to my business
> and my participation in newsgroups.

Yet you have a history of sock-puppetry on these groups!

> I'm not now of the opinion that giving back as good as they dish out is
> likely to achieve any sort of outcome likely to keep me seen as the innocent
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Doug

then maybe you better put that petrol tin down before your fanning of
the flames turns around and bites you on the arse!

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Noons - 27 Sep 2007 06:54 GMT
> his swearing or obscenities, that little fact has not escaped the
> attention of the regulars

"regulars", fuckwit?  Who? You?
Get f.cked, arsehole troll!

> I don't start the trouble Doug, but I will do my damnedest to make sure
> that yours and Noons doesn't go unnoticed.

Dear me, I'm sooooo terrified.
Now, f.ck off, troll.
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 07:18 GMT
>> his swearing or obscenities, that little fact has not escaped the
>> attention of the regulars
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Dear me, I'm sooooo terrified.
> Now, f.ck off, troll.

You live in Sydney ??
Take a walk along a beach this afternoon, it might help calm you down.......

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Noons - 27 Sep 2007 06:51 GMT
> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see he
> is able to go around telling everyone to "Get f.cked" all over these
> groups, yet not a peep from you about his swearing on a public forum and

nonononono, you got it all wrong.
It's not "get f.cked".
It's:
f.ck OFF aus.photo,
you dumbfuck retard.
Is it clear now or you still under the influence of the
fumes, you stupid dipshit troll?

And it shows up every time fuckwits like
you who have never contributed ANYTHING to a newsgroup
pretend to take the high ground and come out of the
woodwork like the rat-arsed trolls  you are.

> Is it because if the pair of you can drive away the knowlegable
> photographers, you can then spew your drivel without fear of being shown
> up for the clueless little weasel you realy are ??

No, it's because I don't give a f.ck sh.t about
clueless morons like YOU, who have NEVER
contributed ANYTHING, ANYWHERE, and
yet pretend to be all pure and nice.
Go shove it up your arse, fuckwit.
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 07:16 GMT
>> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see he
>> is able to go around telling everyone to "Get f.cked" all over these
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
> yet pretend to be all pure and nice.
> Go shove it up your arse, fuckwit.

Wow, I think its time you checked your medication!
first you admit to being a retard and now your foaming at the mouth and
ranting like a complete and utter fool, your in dire need of some
SERIOUS mental help my friend, I suggest you get it before all that spit
dribbling from your chin short circuits something and you get
electrocuted, seriously..................

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D-Mac - 27 Sep 2007 07:34 GMT
>>> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see he
>>> is able to go around telling everyone to "Get f.cked" all over these
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> from your chin short circuits something and you get electrocuted,
> seriously..................

Don't be a flame troll Bart... You'll lose whatever cred you might have
left.
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 07:55 GMT
>>>> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see he
>>>> is able to go around telling everyone to "Get f.cked" all over these
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> Don't be a flame troll Bart... You'll lose whatever cred you might have
> left.

regardless of how much "cred" I lose here, I will still have 1000% more
than you and your lapdog :-)
or have you not noticed that the ONLY one sticking up for you in this
group is your pet spaniel?

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

D-Mac - 27 Sep 2007 08:46 GMT
>>>>> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see
>>>>> he
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> or have you not noticed that the ONLY one sticking up for you in this
> group is your pet spaniel?

"This group" Bart, is made up of individule people with their own opinions.
Where ever you got the idea anyone needs to "stick up" for me is beyond
comprehension.

Plenty of people interact with me and we get along just fine. Why would you
expect them to invite bad behaviour aimed at them, from a bunch of
unsociable people by publicly "sticking up" for me when they have no need to
do that?

I'm well and truly seasoned enough in this world to fight my own battles.
I'd be quite disappointed if anyone not effected by the idiots stuck their
nose in to "stick up" for me.

You really ought to get rid of the mob mentality thing and formulate a set
of "life rules" for yourself. Only then can you expect any opinion you might
express to be taken seriously.

As things stand, you seem to need a certain kind of highly offensive company
before you can express an opinion. You know ...when I refer to the "sheep"
in these groups, I'm talking about those who need mob approval before they
do anything.

I'd imagine you are fatherless or else you had a father incapable of or
unwilling to provide you with an education for success in life... Does that
make you a loser? Only if you can't learn for yourself... Give it a try. You
might be surprised at how people change their attitude towards you. It's no
sin to be polite.

Doug
El Barto - 27 Sep 2007 09:50 GMT
>>>>>> Oh and while your at it do a search of that foul mouthed Noons, I see
>>>>>> he
[quoted text clipped - 54 lines]
> of "life rules" for yourself. Only then can you expect any opinion you might
> express to be taken seriously.

Actualy Doug, I imagine that I get taken more seriously in this group
than you do, It might have something to do with your persecution
mentality, apparently there is a "group" here that is always picking on
you, yet you have done nothing wrong............

> As things stand, you seem to need a certain kind of highly offensive company
> before you can express an opinion. You know ...when I refer to the "sheep"
> in these groups, I'm talking about those who need mob approval before they
> do anything.

yet you are the one "Sticking up" for one of the most offensive posters
currently infecting this group
double standards there Doug!

> I'd imagine you are fatherless or else you had a father incapable of or
> unwilling to provide you with an education for success in life... Does that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Doug

Actually both my parents are alive and well Doug, I come from a long
line of centenarian's and please don't pretend to take the high road,
then lower yourself to have a dig at someones parents, you must know by
now, with all your experience and all on the net, that comments like
that are solely aimed at inflaming the situation, and for one who
professes to not like fanning the flames, it looks like your setting
double standards yet again.
I will let my Dad know you send him your best wishes :-)

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Noons - 27 Sep 2007 14:41 GMT
> Actualy Doug, I imagine that I get taken more seriously in this group
> than you do,

You have NEVER contributed anything whatsoever
to this group,  you demented liar.

> yet you are the one "Sticking up" for one of the most offensive posters
> currently infecting this group

Actually, he isn't.  But your butt-sniffing view of life
is too narrow to even be able to see that.

> Actually both my parents are alive and well Doug, I come from a long
> line of centenarian's and please don't pretend to take the high road,
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> professes to not like fanning the flames, it looks like your setting
> double standards yet again.

Go to bed, you stupid child.  High time you got
some sleep.
Harold Hughes - Activity Director - 27 Sep 2007 14:51 GMT
>> yet you are the one "Sticking up" for one of the most offensive posters
>> currently infecting this group
>
> Actually, I'm not.  

Typo fixed
Noons - 27 Sep 2007 15:50 GMT
On Sep 27, 11:51 pm, Harold Hughes - Activity Director <....@---.com>
wrote:

> Typo fixed

Piss of, dickhead.
You can't even read a header.
El Barto - 28 Sep 2007 00:55 GMT
> On Sep 27, 11:51 pm, Harold Hughes - Activity Director <....@---.com>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Piss of, dickhead.
> You can't even read a header.

Yeah! like headers cant be forged...............

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

El Barto - 28 Sep 2007 00:54 GMT
>> Actualy Doug, I imagine that I get taken more seriously in this group
>> than you do,
>
> You have NEVER contributed anything whatsoever
> to this group,  you demented liar.

I have contributed to this group by pointing out that you are an
offensive retard and that D-Mac had double standards, I don't see many
of your photographic posts in here, all I see from you lately is
outright abuse and negative comments by those in the group that are
actually posting their photographic work for comment and criticism, why
is it that everyone but you and D-Mac have something positive to say and
in most cases praise the work and effort put into those photo's ??

>> yet you are the one "Sticking up" for one of the most offensive posters
>> currently infecting this group
>
> Actually, he isn't.  But your butt-sniffing view of life
> is too narrow to even be able to see that.

so you admit to being offensive as well as a retard!

>> Actually both my parents are alive and well Doug, I come from a long
>> line of centenarian's and please don't pretend to take the high road,
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Go to bed, you stupid child.  High time you got
> some sleep.

I made my post at 6:50pm EST, you made yours at 11:41pm EST and YOUR the
one telling me to get to bed! so who is really the stupid child here??

I noticed you have toned down your obscenities, did D-Mac (your master)
get in your ear? or are you actually afraid that he will also turn on
you like he has to so many other people he has professed to have a truce
with, and report you to your ISP for swearing on a public forum ??

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Noons - 27 Sep 2007 14:37 GMT
> Wow, I think its time you checked your medication!

The only one on chemicals here is you, troll.

> ranting like a complete and utter fool, your in dire need of some
> SERIOUS mental help my friend, I suggest you get it before all that spit
> dribbling from your chin short circuits something and you get
> electrocuted, seriously..................

The only one here dribbling is you, arsehole.
And I'm not your friend, you stupid patronising git.
As for the help,. start asking your God for it.
And don't you EVER try to threaten me again,
online or offline, you stupid fool.
El Barto - 28 Sep 2007 00:56 GMT
>> Wow, I think its time you checked your medication!
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> And don't you EVER try to threaten me again,
> online or offline, you stupid fool.

when have I EVER threatened you!

put up or shut up.

Signature

Annika1980: How does it feel to be the usual retard responsible for many
of them?
Noons: Absolutely GREAT!

Annika1980 - 26 Sep 2007 15:01 GMT
> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Doug

Note these pics from the Lambency site:
http://www.flash-diffuser.com/cloud.html
http://www.flash-diffuser.com/clear.htm

They were stolen from this page on Gary Fong's website:
http://store.garyfonginc.com/liiido.html

Congrats, Doug.  You are now supporting a Chinese company who engages
in copyright infringement and image theft.
I can only imagine what reaction you might have if some of your pics
showed up on their site.
D-Mac - 26 Sep 2007 19:23 GMT
>> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> I can only imagine what reaction you might have if some of your pics
> showed up on their site.

So how do you feel yourself?

Doug
Pete D - 26 Sep 2007 21:35 GMT
>>> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Doug

Probably the same way you do, puts his hands in his pants and there it is!!!
Annika1980 - 26 Sep 2007 21:39 GMT
> > Congrats, Doug.  You are now supporting a Chinese company who engages
> > in copyright infringement and image theft.
> > I can only imagine what reaction you might have if some of your pics
> > showed up on their site.
>
> So how do you feel yourself?

Usually, in the dark.
Scott W - 27 Sep 2007 00:25 GMT
>> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> They were stolen from this page on Gary Fong's website:
> http://store.garyfonginc.com/liiido.html

I did not look at all of Gary Fong's website, but with the links you
gave it looks like the photo of the hand in the clear diffuser is larger
and clearer from the Lambency site compared to the same image on Fong's
site.  One has to wonder just where this photo originated from.

Scott
Atheist Chaplain - 27 Sep 2007 01:30 GMT
maybe they Used Douggies "enlargement algorithm" to make the picture bigger
and add detail from nothing.

Signature

"Calling Atheism a religion is like calling bald a hair color."
Don Hirschberg

>>> How many people rushed out and bought a Gary Fong diffuser?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> Scott
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.