> Managed to score a ticket to last Wednesday night's State of Origin[1]
> opening match at Suncorp Stadium, so took the trusty MZ60 and Tamron
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> My favourites are the ones where they are kicking goals, and you can see
> the ball has just left the foot.
Dunno about the monopod, there's no appreciable shake that I can see on
your images, and I have to say they surprised me, coming from 800 ISO
film, at least at web sizes.
As for me, I would have been reaching for a 30D (1D series are well out
of my price range!) at 1600 or 3200 ISO, rather than a P&S or a zlr, but
that's just me, willingly seduced by digital.
Colin D.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Graham Fountain - 29 May 2007 10:05 GMT
> Dunno about the monopod, there's no appreciable shake that I can see on
> your images, and I have to say they surprised me, coming from 800 ISO
> film, at least at web sizes.
As 6x4 prints there is only slightly noticeable grain - only slightly worse
than 400 film. I did one as an 8x10, and it's a bit grainy - not disgusting
though. I've always found Fuji Superia 800 to be a fairly good film for
it's speed - certainly better than the Kodak equivalent, and better than
exposing 400 film at 800.
Most of the shots I posted would have been taken at about 135mm - most of
them could do with a little more zoom to get the subject a bit larger in the
frame. At 135mm, the tamron 70-300/4-5.6 is F4.5, and the combination of
wider aperture and shorter focal length, meant that the shutter speed was
well within the hand-held range at about 1/200. At 300mm though, shutter
speeds were dropping to around 1/125 which was pushing it for the longer
focal length. Some of them came out ok, some were mush. Additionally, the
slower speeds weren't much good for stopping motion.
I _might_ be getting tickets for game 3 in about 6 weeks time, so if I do I
might try Fuji Press 1600. (Can't see any chance of SWMBO allowing me to
purchase something that will give F2.8-4 at 300).
> As for me, I would have been reaching for a 30D (1D series are well out
> of my price range!) at 1600 or 3200 ISO, rather than a P&S or a zlr, but
> that's just me, willingly seduced by digital.
A Pentax K10D/Samsung GX10 is on the shopping list, but not until I get my
tax refund - probably around sept/oct.
I've tried quite a few P&S digi's, and frankly, they suck at anything beyond
about ISO 200. They are good for what they are designed for - P&S happy
snaps. The FSLR performs significantly better than P&S digi's, so until
SWMBO releases the funds for the DSLR, I'll happily continue shooting film
for anything I want reasonable quality, and use my digi for happy snaps.
> Colin D.