Have you done a photography course?

Signature
Joan
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly
: Hi,
:
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
:
: Sophs.
> Hi,
>
> Over the many years I have been taking pictures I have had many
> camera's. But I have never been happy with any of them. I know it
> sounds bizarre but I want to capture what my eye sees. I have never
> achieved that with the camera's Ive had.
That's not an uncommon opinion - what you need to realise is that while
people regard photography as "real", it is in fact a flawed compromise
compared to the way we see things. Our eyes are dynamic things that
constantly adjust focus, exposure, white balance, pan from side to side,
while a camera has to take one image with all these attributes locked. The
skill of a good photographer is to learn how to see - identify what makes a
scene special and work out how it could translate to a shot - often it
won't, or it needs to be a different perspective or light to work as a
photo. Sometimes it just doesn't work.
A good example of this is someone who does a long climb of a hill, is
exhilarated to get to the top, then shoots pictures of what they see - wide
shots of hilly horizons with heaps of sky - which tend to be breathtakingly
underwhelming photos.
It'd be useful to know what kind of things you are seeking to shoot. For
example, a colleague of mine has always been frustrated by their landscape
shots - they claim the camera isn't "seeing" what they saw. Technically, you
could put that down to the sharpness of the lens, haze in the atmosphere,
perhaps the size of the print (or their screen) was too small , or even just
the fact that their eyes had scanned a scene from side to side, focussed on
key aspects, dynamically adjusting exposure as they did, then wondered why
the camera didn't do as good a job.
If you want to know what the "best" camera to use, the answer would be one
of the Canon or Nikon digital SLRs with their kit 17-55 or so lenses. That
combined with a bit of technique, and you can take some stunning pics. You
can pay a lot more and get marginally more impressive shots, or you can pay
less and get one of the "compact" DSLRs, but I haven't seen one that
produces as pleasing shots as easily as the aforementioned "full" DSLRs.
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Sophs.
What cameras have you used? Perhaps you need to move to Large Format or at
Least Medium Format.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Mr.T - 17 Mar 2007 03:14 GMT
<sophiegolden@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1174037889.884049.4580@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > Over the many years I have been taking pictures I have had many
> > camera's. But I have never been happy with any of them. I know it
> > sounds bizarre but I want to capture what my eye sees. I have never
> > achieved that with the camera's Ive had.
> >
> > All thoughts welcome.
> What cameras have you used? Perhaps you need to move to Large Format or at
> Least Medium Format.
Until you can properly use a smaller format camera, it's simply a waste of
money buying a medium or large format camera.
Sophie, learn how to properly use what you have, then YOU will probably know
what features it is missing that YOU require. At that stage you can make
your own purchasing decision better than we can.
MrT.
Pete D - 17 Mar 2007 04:39 GMT
> <sophiegolden@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:1174037889.884049.4580@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> MrT.
Why assume the OP does not have lots of experience? Many cameras, many
years, sounds like lots of experience! ;-)
Mr.T - 18 Mar 2007 11:33 GMT
> >> > Over the many years I have been taking pictures I have had many
> >> > camera's. But I have never been happy with any of them. I know it
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> Why assume the OP does not have lots of experience? Many cameras, many
> years, sounds like lots of experience! ;-)
Yes but where did *I* mention "experience" ?
I simply suggested they learn how to *properly* use what they have first.
MrT.
Pete D - 18 Mar 2007 11:57 GMT
>> >> > Over the many years I have been taking pictures I have had many
>> >> > camera's. But I have never been happy with any of them. I know it
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> MrT.
Doesn't matter, here was a troll anyway!
Sophs wrote:
> Over the many years I have been taking pictures I have had many
> camera's. But I have never been happy with any of them. I know it
> sounds bizarre but I want to capture what my eye sees. I have never
> achieved that with the camera's Ive had.
I believe that's not possible and will never happen. Perhaps you need to
train your eye to see like a camera. Then you won't be disappointed (I'm
serious!).