Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / March 2007
They're back! - the pelicans I mean!
|
|
Thread rating:  |
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 06:24 GMT Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and took to me like you wouldn't believe. It's not fun driving 300 klm with a broken leg to get help!
Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm
Mike Warren - 09 Mar 2007 06:40 GMT > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm The Cairns Pelicans and Egrets aren't back this year yet. Hopefully soon.
There was an old man up her feeding some of them each day but he died last year. We could get quite close to them.
http://web.aanet.com.au/miwa/N05-3055-web.jpg
 Signature -Mike
MJW - 09 Mar 2007 08:12 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last > year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm Here's one for you Doug. Was the best I could get with my "kit" 75-300mm lens!
www.members.optusnet.com.au/mjwyllie/pelican.htm
 Signature >>>M.J.Wyllie.<<<
Mick Brown - 09 Mar 2007 09:23 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper > creek last year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm I go up to Maroochydore a lot, but I've never had time to stop and shoot these big beasts, you usually see one on each post going over the bridge.
Mike Brown www.photo.net/photo/mbrown
Rob - 09 Mar 2007 09:37 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last > year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm "About the dots on these images. They are there because of my publishing criteria and may assist in thwarting image thieves."
And who in there right mind would want to thieve that sh.t. They are pathetic.
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 10:32 GMT : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last : > year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] : And who in there right mind would want to thieve that sh.t. They are : pathetic. It's cretins like you the rest of the Internet can thank for that.
Andrew Hennell - 09 Mar 2007 19:42 GMT > : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek > last [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > It's cretins like you the rest of the Internet can thank for that. Nah, I think you've taken the best route with protecting your intellectual property - put up images NOBODY would want to steal in the first place, with or without dots. http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/IMG_1612.png
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 20:25 GMT : > : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek : > last [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] : first place, with or without dots. : http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/IMG_1612.png That's about the first sensible post you've made this year, Andrew.
Oz - 11 Mar 2007 06:32 GMT >> : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper >> creek [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > first place, with or without dots. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/IMG_1612.png hehehe I just discovered that D-Macs copy protection dots as curtesy of a transparent gif.gif, I just used the Adblock function of Firefox to remove it and bingo, a dotless image :-)
Just so predictable D-Mac, so every time someone has viewed the page they have actually been downloading the real image PLUS a the dots :-) as the real image is the tables background this is the url for the dots, just open the page in firefox, open adblock and highlight http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/%A9copyright_violation_if_you_copy_this_image.gif he has also put his copyright notice over the pic as text, he is obviously too stupid to use MS pain and the text tool :-)
Oz
Rob - 11 Mar 2007 06:44 GMT >>> : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper >>> creek [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Oz Took you a while to find that :)
rm
Oz - 11 Mar 2007 23:41 GMT >>>> : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper >>>> creek [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > > rm Its not like I go there every day, If I want to see bad photography I could just take some photos with a $10 cheapie digital with the lens covered in Vaseline ;-)
Oz
Annika1980 - 09 Mar 2007 15:57 GMT > And who in there right mind would want to thieve that sh.t. They are > pathetic. Haven't you heard? Blurry. poorly composed shots of pelicans are all the rage these days.
Eric Hocking - 12 Mar 2007 16:05 GMT >> And who in there right mind would want to thieve that sh.t. They are >> pathetic. > > Haven't you heard? > Blurry. poorly composed shots of pelicans are all the rage these days. Fortunately the next generation don't agree!
<http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/OnlineGallery/P hoto.jsp?photo=2217>
 Signature Eric Hocking "A closed mouth gathers no feet" "Ignorance is a renewable resource" P.J.O'Rourke
Rob - 12 Mar 2007 21:55 GMT >>>And who in there right mind would want to thieve that sh.t. They are >>>pathetic. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > <http://www.nhm.ac.uk/visit-us/whats-on/temporary-exhibitions/wpy/OnlineGallery/P hoto.jsp?photo=2217> Ten years and under - Winner
Canon EOS 10D with EF 100-400mm f4.5-5.6L IS lens; 1/60 sec at f4.5.
and that's all he has to use at 19 and under!
Avery - 09 Mar 2007 10:27 GMT >Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last >year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. >http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm Wow! Those pics are sooo good! I mean you can see the jetty and like, everything.
If it weren't for the dots I would certainly have downloaded them, instead, I just looked.
Pete D - 09 Mar 2007 10:43 GMT >>Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek >>last [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > If it weren't for the dots I would certainly have downloaded them, > instead, I just looked. LOL.
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 10:47 GMT : >Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last : >year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] : If it weren't for the dots I would certainly have downloaded them, : instead, I just looked. Very good, Avery... Why would you want one of those pictures when you have such a magnificent life size poster of the famous "Peter" pelican of Harvey Bay fame, which I sent you entirely at my own expense just a few weeks ago?
More likely you are up to your old habit of getting in a bit of Doug bashing but (Boo Hoo to you) there's nothing of substance to bash me with anymore. You really are quite pathetic, you know? Why don't you get off my case?
Douglas
Avery - 09 Mar 2007 23:34 GMT >: >Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek >last [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > >Douglas You mean they are your pictures?
I didn't even realiise that I was "Doug bashing".
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 00:35 GMT : >: >Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek : >last [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] : : I didn't even realiise that I was "Doug bashing". Everything has a reason, Avery. Even though the reason may not be known to anyone but the person who has it. I had a reason for setting up that site and I had a reason for posting some pretty average pictures on it. Those reasons will no doubt unfold clearer to you as the next phase of the fight with this loud mouthed Yankee mongrel gets into full swing.
Avery... You can't offer a settlement to someone as Bret Hogan did and then go about doing the same things that started it all in the first place and expect not to get bloodied again or keep any credibility for your sincerity. He clearly values his own needs for being a smart arse higher than that of the effects of getting done over himself.
Hogan agreed not to do what he's just done in return for me removing humiliating information about him and evidence that he too, published some pretty terrible photos when the subject is spontaneous ...from the web site I set up using his screen name. I've still got time to give it a substantial make over and get some real effect from it.
I apologise to you if I understood you to have know it was my web site but you actually thought it was his. I guess when Hogan used my name to set up a taunt site on pbase to which he posted some of my client's photos for the taunting, the confusion of ownership and identity began. I note with some interest he is only doing this now on a newsgroup intended for Australian participation and not his favourite group... Speaks volumes for his character, doesn't it? Keep it going in my backyard while attempting to hold me to an agreement in his own... Not going to happen.
When someone else decided the rules of engagement, it's up to the one being attacked to devise a better defence. Mine is not to defend at all by to attack with any and every available means I can muster. Attack harder and with more force than I got attacked with. Your comment may have been innocent. I had no way of knowing and I still don't know if it was.
One thing is for sure Avery... No one has the right to criticize another person's work when their own is worse. Anyone who does it to me and doesn't afford me the right of return criticism is a troll of the worst kind.
Why idiots from WA hiding behind binary smut servers in Italy and so called "variable" IP addresses locally can't handle criticism themselves and decline to post any of their own photos is something anyone reading this thread needs to consider before giving me a hard time for retaliating.
Douglas
Graham Fountain - 09 Mar 2007 11:04 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek > last [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm Speaking of Pelicans - have you heard any more on that old mate of yours that got in trouble for feeding them up at hervey bay?
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 20:29 GMT : > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek : > last [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] : Speaking of Pelicans - have you heard any more on that old mate of yours : that got in trouble for feeding them up at hervey bay? --------------- No Graham... He was pretty crook last contact I had with him and he doesn't live where he used to if he's still alive. The bird is still there, I believe.
Maybe when the issue with idiots and my images gets under control, I'll post the sequence of them dancing on the beach together, fishing together and interacting like you'd never believe unless you saw it for yourself.
Douglas
gerrit - 09 Mar 2007 11:32 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek last > year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm Did you:
1 Get annika's OK before the identity theft?
2 Use the dots in your you-beaut program to get more information out of a file to show more detail than was ever in the original when you enlarge them?
and also:
Why not publish some of the photos you took before the pelican broke your leg? Or even one of your broken leg to show what lengths you will go to to get wonderful photos?
Annika1980 - 09 Mar 2007 15:55 GMT > >http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm > > Did you: > > 1 Get annika's OK before the identity theft? It does seem odd that he continues to use that site. I laugh whenever I see it knowing that he actually had to spend money to attempt to mock me. hey D-Mac, why not cough up the $23 for a quality pic-sharing site? www.pbase.com
> 2 Use the dots in your you-beaut program to get more information out of a > file to show more detail than was ever in the original when you enlarge > them? To your untrained amateur eye those dots may look like dust spots on the sensor which could have been taken care of in 5 seconds of post- processing by anyone with more than 5 minutes experience with Photoshop. Actually, they are well-placed calibration marks for D-Mac's super- secret resizing algorithm. The dots also serve as watermarks to keep all you thievin bastards from stealing his pics and getting rich off of them. Of course, without Douggie's super-secret resizing algorithm it would be impossible to make big beautiful poster-sized canvas prints from Douggie's tiny web images.
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 20:32 GMT : > >http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm : > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] : it would be impossible to make big beautiful poster-sized canvas : prints from Douggie's tiny web images. Thank you for that explanation Bret. I wasn't aware you progressed that far in your quest for knowledge. It's all totally believable too... Like all the rest of your bullshit.
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 21:45 GMT : > >http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm : > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] : :Annika1980.com is a legally registered domain of mine. Unlike the idiot who registered every conotation of annika1980@#### with all the free eMail providers in the free world, I don't have a problem with putting my money where my mouth is.
I established taht domain and created the web site under guidance from a paralegal as an insurance policy against my pet troll biting me in the future. There is no know vaccine for troll bites. The only way to deal with them is bite them back harder. I'm about to reopen that original site any day now. Seemingly the bites from scuffle last month have worn off. They obviously need to draw blood to be effective.
I already have an account on Pbase. http://www.pbase.com/annika_hogan I plan to use it via satellite from my catamaran; Ryadia next month... I'll be filling it with some really interesting photos of my favourite troll hard at work in the backwoods of Tennessee in the following months.
How far is your place from Florida Bret? Can I rent a car to get there or should I go for one of these Winnebago motor homes? Maybe I can stay with one of your "Spot the Turkey" players?
They say you've never really made it on the Internet until you get your own personal troll. I just swapped Mark Thomas for you. Your's much more fun than he ever was.
Enjoy it while you can...
Douglas
Annika1980 - 10 Mar 2007 03:24 GMT > : hey D-Mac, why not cough up the $23 for a quality pic-sharing site? > :www.pbase.com [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > day now. Seemingly the bites from scuffle last month have worn off. They > obviously need to draw blood to be effective. On March 1 after we reached our private peace accord I predicted to a friend that you'd blow up within 10 days. Eight days along now, and it looks like you are right on schedule. Maybe your paranoia has outraced your meds, but the fact is that you just can't let it go, can you?
Take this little page of yours, for example: http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/index.htm
It's filled with lies. Nice pic at the bottom, BTW. I like the tile effect. I see you've grown past just cutting off their feet. Just to correct a few inaccuracies on that page that you keep repeating, my reaction to your lightning pic was, "Cool pic!" Somehow in your twisted mind you read that as, "Wow, you were an awesome photographer to get a great shot like that!" You keep claiming that I can't spot the fact that it was a faked photo. Yeah, whatever. I have plenty of your fakes and they are all laughably easy to spot.
Then you claimed that I held some resentment toward you after that pic was posted. Once again, not true. My first battles with you were when you were posting as Ryadia and making stupid claims about how shooting RAW was unneccessary and how you could get identical results from shooting JPG. I didn't even know you as Douglas MacDonald at that time. You changed your name so often it was kinda hard to keep up. I think my friend, Mark Thomas, has the official roster. Perhaps he should post it to end the confusion.
The part about the pbase gallery I posted was true, but you conveniently left out some of the details about what precipitated it ... namely wishing death on me and other ugly stuff I don't care to re-hash.
Then you claimed that some online friend of yours sent me these dastardly pics of me which have been hidden away. In fact, many of them are from my own sites which have been readily available online for over 5 years. Hate to burst your bubble, Inspector Clouseau.
My point is, D-Mac, that your real problem is not me. It's not Mark Thomas and it isn't the scores of other posters who mock you and your work. The real problem is YOU. You create enemies where none exist. You are a delusional paranoid, plain and simple. I'm not trying to insult you when I say that ... it's just a fact. I have tried really hard to be friendly with you, but you just won't have it.
[start Pulp Fiction reference]
But I saw some sh.t this mornin' made me think twice. Now I'm thinkin' it could mean you're the evil man. And I'm the righteous man. And pbase.com here, he's the shepherd protecting my righteous a.s in the valley of darkness. Or it could be you're the righteous man and I'm the shepherd and it's the world that's evil and selfish. I'd like that. But that sh.t ain't the truth. The truth is you're the weak. And I'm the tyranny of evil men. But I'm tryin', D-Mac. I'm tryin' real hard to be a shepherd.
Let it go, D-Mac.
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 05:59 GMT "Annika1980" <annika1980@aol.com> wrote in message
: But I saw some sh.t this mornin' made me think twice. Now I'm thinkin' : it could mean you're the evil man. And I'm the righteous man. And [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] : : Let it go, D-Mac. Let he who cast the first stone, be the first to stop the fighting.
It works like this fool... You stop taking the Mickey out of me and I'll leave you alone too. It's a two way street when you start antagonising people and you've done that with the regularity of a fool with a Laxette habit.
You simply couldn't resit it could you?
"Haven't you heard? Blurry. poorly composed shots of pelicans are all the rage these days."
Despite offering you proof absolute in the form of a life size poster for absolutely no cost to you... You didn't want to see that I actually do excellent poster enlargements of digital images. You prefer to keep Mark Thomas's bullshit floating around with comments like this:
"Of course, without Douggie's super-secret resizing algorithm it would be impossible to make big beautiful poster-sized canvas prints from Douggie's tiny web images."
Tell me Bret... Is this not your attempt to ridicule me and the process I helped pioneer to enlarge digital images? You and him seem to think posting information about what I do in the interest of a "NEWS GROUP ARTICLE" is somehow a criminal offence ...or is it just your twisted mind's idea of having a good time?
Give up on your jealousy of me. Control your urge to take me on whenever you think I've set you up for it and maybe I'll pass up on your dim witted attitude of fairness.
Basically I'm saying keep to your agreement. I only offered to remove the photos I downloaded from Pbase off that site and the humiliating page of photos one of your "friends" sent me. I can put it back with lots of extras in a minute's notice.
If you think for one moment I'm going to just let your absolutely disgusting behaviour continue to have an impact on me, you are a sadly mistaken man. The site stays until you prove you can be trusted... So far you are not doing very well in that area.
Douglas
Annika1980 - 10 Mar 2007 15:05 GMT > Despite offering you proof absolute in the form of a life size poster for > absolutely no cost to you... You didn't want to see that I actually do [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > it would be impossible to make big beautiful poster-sized canvas > prints from Douggie's tiny web images." Yes, you offered me one of your posters. Yes, I turned you down. As if I'd want your crappy photo (covered with text) hanging on my wall.
You want to really prove that your re-sizing algorithm is all you claim? It's real easy. Just take one of my small (say 800x600) web images from my gallery (I know you can do that) and blow it up to about 6000x4000 size. You don't have to mail anything. Just post it on the web, maybe on that website you paid for just to try to mock me. Heck, you can even post a crop of just one part of the image if you like. Here's one that might provide a good test: http://www.pbase.com/image/70047094
But you won't do that because you're full of crap.
You have no "algorithm." You simply enlarge the image and then manually go over and image and "paint in" pixels where you want them. It must be a tedious process as you have mentioned in some previous posts.
The same goes for your poster that you seem so proud of. Just e-mail me the file. I can check the quality from that. But you won't do that. You couldn't claim it was lost in the mail or some other such hogwash.
See, that's the problem, D-Mac. Whenever someone challenges you to prove your wild claims you go apeshit and attack them or else pull your own photos down so nobody can see them. Oops, I forgot ... those aren't really "photographs" are they? Why not simply accept the challenge and prove them wrong? I have outlined above exactly how you can prove your resizing algorithm really works. It is now up to you to put up or shut up.
Oz - 09 Mar 2007 14:20 GMT > Whilst shooting Pelicans breeding from a rough hide on the Cooper creek > last > year. An old man pelican with a real protective urge heard the shutter and > took to me like you wouldn't believe. It's not fun driving 300 klm with a > broken leg to get help! pity it wasn't your neck :-)
Oh and the dots are easily removed/repaired, you don't even need Photoshop, PSP will do just fine. but lets face it, my 11 year old son has taken better photos than these :-) Oz
Annika1980 - 09 Mar 2007 16:13 GMT http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm
Hey D-Mac, Since we are being all lovey-dovey and sh.t to each other I have an honest-to-goodness photo tip for ya. I offer this tip in the spirt of reconciliation. It is a simple quick and easy step that will improve every single one of your photos. Other people may want to try it on their photos as well, but the results probably won't be as successful as from using D-Mac's pics.
Anwyay, without further ado I present "Anni's 2-minute Photoshop Fix."
Step #1: Open one of D-Mac's pics in Photoshop. Step #2: Open one of my photos (actually anyone else's photos will work).
You should now have two different photos open in Photoshop. Now this is where the magic happens.
Step #3: Drag my photo on top of D-mac's photo. You should now have two layers in the file ... D-Mac's photo (the Background Layer) and my photo on top.
Step #4: Delete the Background Layer.
That's all there is to it! You have now taken a blurry, poorly- composed piece of crap and made it into a sharp, beautiful photo that anyone would be proud to display.
More savvy Photoshop or Adobe Bridge users may even want to create an action to accomplish this task more quickly. Something like going to a file of D-Mac's pics choosing "Select All" and then "Delete."
Andrew Hennell - 09 Mar 2007 19:45 GMT > http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/returnl.htm > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > action to accomplish this task more quickly. Something like going to a > file of D-Mac's pics choosing "Select All" and then "Delete." bwahaahahaha
Andrew Hennell - 09 Mar 2007 19:47 GMT > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. speaking of being 'back', or 'coming home'...
didn't you post something about packing up and heading off on your boat? that you wouldn't be posting here for a long time?
I can't be bothered trawling back through messages to find it, but I do remember being both relieved at the prospect of you not sprouting sh.t, and concerned the group would have to discuss real photography from then on.
But true to form, you lied :)
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 20:34 GMT : > Well... All I had to do was wait until they came home. : [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] : : But true to form, you lied :) If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel free to set sail tomorrow. and would you stop being an absolute fuckwit for a change?
Andrew Hennell - 09 Mar 2007 22:49 GMT > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel free > to set sail tomorrow. and would you stop being an absolute fuckwit for a > change? Hang on, aren't you in Queensland? http://www.bom.gov.au/weather/qld/cyclone/ - nup, no cyclones there. http://www.bom.gov.au/gms/IDE00005.latest.shtml - nup, can't see any there either. hrmmmm... is this like your photography 'secrets'? are you aware of things we mere motals aren't? You better explain to the BOM how they've got it so wrong.
Or maybe, just maybe, those satellite images they post aren't images at all? or photographs? Perhaps the BOM should put dots on them to prevent theft! oh I can't follow your delusions any longer :)
and if my behaviour makes me an 'absolute fuckwit', then that would make you about the only non-fuckwit I know.
Cheers :)
D-Mac - 09 Mar 2007 23:01 GMT : > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel free : > to set sail tomorrow. and would you stop being an absolute fuckwit for a [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : http://www.bom.gov.au/gms/IDE00005.latest.shtml - nup, can't see any : there either. You're right... TODAY. Check last Tuesday when I was due to head off.
I'll tell you now mate. I am very keen to get going. God only knows the eventual destination is many weeks away across some pretty nasty oceans. I am not the least bit interesting in cresting 20 foot waves in a 30 knot head wind with a type of boat known to take off under those conditions. I'll sail when it suits me, not you.
My name is not Tony Bullimore. I sail for the enjoyment, not the thrill of getting into trouble I can't handle. The day a fuckwit like you can dictate when, what or where I do anything will be the end of civilisation.
Douglas
Oz - 10 Mar 2007 00:52 GMT > : > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel > free [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Douglas Hers a tip for free, the absolute, biggest and most prolific fuckwit on this or any other photo group is YOU!!
get over yourself, keep your hands above the table at all times and just hop on your little boat and sail off into the sunset, we all honestly don't care if you sink without a trace in your own bathtub, but just go the f.ck away and leave the real photography to the real photographers you hack, wannabe, no talent camera pointer (calling you a photographer is an insult to 12 year olds with their first 1 megapixel $39 digital from Aldi)
have a nice day :-)
Oz
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 01:25 GMT : > : > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel : > free [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] : : Oz It seems the childish fuckwits like you who think it's cool to make stupid comments are all proliferation form the same ISP... Who exactly are you? Another sock puppet?
Get a life idiot... When you do actually get to pull your head out of your own arse you'll no doubt discover it's not the sunnies clouding your vision but your own sh.t!
Douglas
Oz - 10 Mar 2007 07:11 GMT > : > : > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, > feel [quoted text clipped - 64 lines] > > Douglas I'm no ones sockpuppet :-) and the only one here with their head up their arse is you, as a matter of fact your head is so far up your own arse that you think people are applauding your work, its not, that's just the sound of the your own lies bouncing back from all the sh.t you carry around, as I said, get over yourself !
Actually I think its not cool to post doctored photos in an attempt to discredit one particular brand of camera and then when your taken to task over it, you start the name calling and hurling of insults, then you run away like the little girl bitch you are and cry foul, bringing the ridicule of those here that are so better than you, to the extent that you end up with a bunch of web sites devoted entirely to showing the world just what a world class fuckwit you really are, then you get all postal and threaten people with legal action from the FBI, action that the FBI will never take because you are also a world class liar.
So lets recap
1/ your a crap photographer 2/ your a crap photographer who tries to tell everyone how good you really are. 3/ your a crap photographer who doctors a supposed fair comparison and then gets the sh.ts and starts name calling when people prove that it was deliberately skewed comparison 4/ your also a liar who has no idea how the legal system really works, but your willing to take the chance that you can bluff your way through it on Usenet.
Did I miss anything anyone else care to ad something
Oz
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 20:50 GMT >So lets recap > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > >Did I miss anything No, I think you've covered pretty much everything.
>anyone else care to ad something Only that Douggie needs to acquaint himself with this concept:
http://www.despair.com/doubt.html
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 20:56 GMT >>So lets recap >>1/ your a crap photographer [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > >No, I think you've covered pretty much everything. Oh, wait, you DID miss something;
5/ You're a crap photographer who posts under multiple aliases because you know that no-one who knows you will listen to you (except for the purpose of ridiculing you) when you post under your own name. Right, Silent Lamb? 6/ You're a crap photographer who has been known to use the X-No Archive flag to avoid standing by your words.
>>anyone else care to ad something >Only that Douggie needs to acquaint himself with this concept: > >http://www.despair.com/doubt.html Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 03:36 GMT >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel >free [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >You're right... TODAY. >Check last Tuesday when I was due to head off. OK, let's do that.
http://72.30.186.56/search/cache?p=Queensland+Weather+Tuesday+6+March+2007&prssw eb=Search&ei=UTF-8&n=10&fl=0&vm=i&x=wrt&meta=vc%3DcountryAU&u=www.webwombat.com/ weather/index.htm&w=queensland+weather+tuesday+6+march+2007&d=SOoyRRIeOZvb&icp=1 &.intl=au
--------------------------------------------------- "Brisbane Australian Government Bureau of Meteorology Queensland
Southeast Coast Forecast Issued at 9:35 pm EST on Tuesday 6 March 2007
Warning Summary Nil.
Southeast Coast District Forecast for Tuesday Evening Scattered showers. Moderate to fresh S to SE winds.
Forecast for Wednesday Scattered showers near the coast, isolated inland. Moderate to fresh SE winds.
[Snip Thursday onwards for space reasons]
Ipswich Forecast for Tuesday Evening A few showers. Moderate to fresh SE winds.
Precis: A few showers
Forecast for Wednesday Mostly fine, only a shower or two. Light to moderate SE to E winds.
Precis: Mostly fine Min 20 Max 30 UV Index: 12 [Extreme]
[Snip Thu +]
Gold Coast Forecast for Tuesday Evening A few showers. Fresh and gusty S to SE winds.
Precis: A few showers
Forecast for Wednesday A few showers. Moderate to fresh S to SE winds.
Precis: A few showers Min 20 Max 28 UV Index: 12 [Extreme]
[Snip Thu. +]
Sunshine Coast Forecast for Tuesday Evening A few showers. Moderate to fresh SE winds.
Precis: Showers" ----------------------------------------------
Warning summary, *NIL*. A few showers and, in one region alone, "fresh and gusty" winds. Why, it's almost a repeat of The Perfect Storm! And this, in Douggie's self-aggrandizing little mind, is "sailing into the eye of a cyclone". BWA-HA-HA!!! Perhaps one of those little pedal boats in an artificial lake is more to his taste.
Of course, anyone who's supposed to have (heroically) driven 300km with a broken leg should have no problem with such terrifying conditions.
[Cue Bette Midler as Douggie sings to his mirror: "Did I ever tell you I'm my heee-rrroooo, I'm everything I wish I could beeee..."]
>I'll tell you now mate. I am very keen to get going. God only knows the >eventual destination is many weeks away across some pretty nasty oceans. I >am not the least bit interesting in cresting 20 foot waves in a 30 knot head >wind with a type of boat known to take off under those conditions. I'll sail >when it suits me, not you.
>My name is not Tony Bullimore. For which you should daily thank your personal god, for if YOU were in that situation I suspect that any decision to rescue you would stretch even the abundant humanitarianism of the R.A.N. to breaking point.
> I sail for the enjoyment, not the thrill of >getting into trouble I can't handle. The day a fuckwit like you can dictate >when, what or where I do anything will be the end of civilisation. Oh Douggie, Douggie, Douggieeeeeee... no-one's trying to dictate to you! It's just the voices in your head talking again; you know, the ones that the nice doctors give you the red pills for. If we were trying to dictate to you we'd probably say things like "use a depth of field that allows sharp a focus on more than two feathers of a single bird" (lower shot). Or, "leading lines are better directed TOWARDS a subject, rather than distractingly off at an angle from it. Even if the lines ARE in the form of a pathetically out of focus wharf".
No, no, no. We're just wishing you Bon Voyage is all. The sooner you disappear over the horizon, the better it is for you, and the better it is for us.
Less entertaining as there'll be one less under-skilled, over-inflated, bulldust-pumping ego to laugh at, but "better" nonetheless.
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 06:05 GMT : >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel : >free [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] : : OK, let's do that. http://72.30.186.56/search/cache?p=Queensland+Weather+Tuesday+6+March+2007&prssw eb=Search&ei=UTF-8&n=10&fl=0&vm=i&x=wrt&meta=vc%3DcountryAU&u=www.webwombat.com/ weather/index.htm&w=queensland+weather+tuesday+6+march+2007&d=SOoyRRIeOZvb&icp=1 &.intl=au
Nothing like a smart arse, is there? Without having the faintest clue where I was heading, you pluck some irrelevant statistic out to have a bit of Doug bashing... What a pathetic idiot you are. "Thick cloud is forming over north QLD near the MONSOON trough, generating heavy showers and THUNDERSTORMS. Cloud from the storms is spreading over the central east, causing light patchy rain. Clear over the south in dry south-westerly winds."
If you knew anything at all about small boats in large oceans whit 35 foot high lightning attracting aluminium masts on them ...If you were heading into the pacific ocean you'd know how this warning would effect anyone sailing north and then east. But no... Have your fun child...
Douglas
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 06:42 GMT >: >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel >: >free [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Nothing like a smart arse, is there? I defer to your expertise. That's probably the only part of YOUR anatomy that shows even the vaguest hint of intelligence.
>Without having the faintest clue where I was heading, you pluck some >irrelevant statistic out to have a bit of Doug bashing... What a pathetic >idiot you are. Oooh, I feel wounded by your rapier-like wit. If it came from someone who knew how to focus a camera, I might even feel abashed.
>"Thick cloud is forming over north QLD near the MONSOON trough, generating >heavy showers and THUNDERSTORMS. Cloud from the storms is spreading over the >central east, causing light patchy rain. Clear over the south in dry >south-westerly winds." Nice quotation. I note the absence of a link. Where's it from, exactly, Douggie's Fantasy Weather Forecasting Service? Even if it's not just something that you're making up (as you have a habit of doing, which is why pretty much no-one in these groups will take you at your word on anything) THUNDERSTORMS, in all caps or not, still don't equate to "sailing into the eye of a cyclone". That, of course, is just your usual grand-standing and posturing. Exaggerate everything, and maybe someone will actually believe you.
In Douggie-world, anyway.
>If you knew anything at all about small boats in large oceans whit 35 foot >high lightning attracting aluminium masts on them ... >If you were heading >into the pacific ocean you'd know how this warning would effect anyone >sailing north and then east. But no... Have your fun child... What I DO know is that if you're sailing "north then east" for a voyage of any length (you did drop a none-too-subtle hint that you were heading for Florida, though that may have been another of your grand-standing hyperbolic lies), at SOME point you're more likely than not to run into foul weather. If that's a problem for you, maybe you should just stay in the yacht club and regale them with stories of how you're as great a sailor as you are a photographer.
Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue services before you even slipped your moorings.
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 07:27 GMT : >: >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, feel : >: >free [quoted text clipped - 58 lines] : Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue : services before you even slipped your moorings. ----------------------
Yeah... Right. Caution is a learnt habit in small boats.... Clearly you don't understand the concept.
You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short.
Pete D - 10 Mar 2007 07:38 GMT > : >: >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, > feel [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. > Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short. And another game of duck, duck, goose is won by Doggie, well done maaaaate, you are a true champion!
Pete D - 10 Mar 2007 07:39 GMT > : >: >: > If you want to head into the eye of a cyclone in a 42 foot boat, > feel [quoted text clipped - 75 lines] > You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. > Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short. And another game of duck, duck, goose is won by Doggie, well done maaaaate, you are a true champion!
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 08:03 GMT >You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. >Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short. [Raises eyebrows] This must be some new "Douggie-World" concept of "pulling someone up short". You state that you're not going to "sail into the eye of a cyclone". I provide weather reports that show that there WAS no cyclone in Qld at that time. You claim that there was, at worst, thunderstorms at some point in your path, although there's no verifiable evidence for that either. (Your word doesn't count, having a credibility factor of 0.) Indeed, you haven't said "where (you) got the info", but perhaps it's from some sooper-sekret weather service which is able to add detail to forecasts retrospectively.
Your hyperbolic claims have therefore (yet again) been exposed for the arrant nonsense that they are, and THAT is your idea of "pulling someone up short".
Oh Douggie, how we're going to miss you when you go sailing off to take more out of focus, badly framed photos on the high seas. All we'll have left is that little thing called "reality". You know what "reality" is, right, Douggie?
Oh. Sorry. I forgot who I was speaking to there for a minute.
I believe that the GREEN pills will be the ones that you'll need to take tonight.
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 08:44 GMT : >You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. : >Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] : I believe that the GREEN pills will be the ones that you'll need to : take tonight. --------------------- What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something you've never seen and will never get to see. If you are referring to the pelicans I posted to bait Hogan, you ought to keep tuned in to the game or get clobbered in your daydream.
: http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/index.htm It's where you get to see pictures of my photos. That's about as far as you'll get to actually seeing one. The only people who matter with their criticism are those who have actually seen one of my photos to criticize... You aren't one of them.
Over 70 clients last year thought enough of my photography to place orders for their own Photography package... Many of them wrote unsolicited thank you letters and almost all of them ordered extra photographs. The weight of people putting their money where your mouth is, makes your fabrication of reality look pretty stupid and childish. How old are you, anyway?
Why should anyone think a fuckwitted idiot like you, who can't even comprehend a marine weather warning or where to get one, would actually have a clue about anything? You don't. You're just imitating parrot fashion from the trolls and doing a piss poor job of it too.
I don't know where you live but it sure as hell isn't Queensland and you sure as hell don't have a handle on the Cyclone that was off the coast when I put back my plans to sail. But then don't let facts interfere with your story... You are obviously getting your rocks off on it.
Pete D - 10 Mar 2007 09:02 GMT > : >You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published > it. [quoted text clipped - 56 lines] > I put back my plans to sail. But then don't let facts interfere with your > story... You are obviously getting your rocks off on it. Whoops, forgot to turn your brain on again buddy, third time today.........
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 20:38 GMT >: >You provided the link which defaulted back to Google... ABC published it. >: >Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >--------------------- >What the f.ck are you on about child... Awwww Douggieeee... that's not nice. Do you kiss your sainted wife with that foul mouth of yours?
>My photography is something you've >never seen and will never get to see. Not to wish to beat you around the head with the blunt instrument of reality (again), but a digital image generated by a camera which is then posted on a web site IS, by pretty much any definition except those that exist in Douggie-world, a "photograph". I've seen them. Many people have seen them.
Some have even stopped laughing by now.
>If you are referring to the pelicans I >posted to bait Hogan, you ought to keep tuned in to the game or get >clobbered in your daydream. Ah yes, because your wit and intelligence, not to mention sanity (what there is of it) has served you SO well in Usenet disputes in the past. I quake in fear.
>: http://www.annika1980.com/D-Macs/index.htm It's where you get to see >pictures of my photos. That's about as far as you'll get to actually seeing >one. The only people who matter with their criticism are those who have >actually seen one of my photos to criticize... You aren't one of them. Quite the contrary, Douggie. You put the woeful efforts that pass for your photography on the Web. People see them. People can criticise them. That's the way it works when you've taken the green pills and the voices subside.
>Over 70 clients last year thought enough of my photography to place orders >for their own Photography package... Many of them wrote unsolicited thank >you letters and almost all of them ordered extra photographs. The weight of >people putting their money where your mouth is, makes your fabrication of >reality look pretty stupid and childish. Ah, fond memories of Gordon Gekko: "A fool and his money are lucky enough to get together in the first place." If these poor souls have their wallets drained a little because they haven't had experience of GOOD photography, I can but pity them.
>How old are you, anyway? Older and wiser than you could imagine, Douggie. Certainly old enough to recognise appalling photographs, anyway.
And old enough not to have to resort to rabid, foul mouthed profanity when my backside's being handed to me in a Usenet thread.
>Why should anyone think a fuckwitted idiot like you, who can't even >comprehend a marine weather warning or where to get one, would actually have >a clue about anything? You don't. You're just imitating parrot fashion from >the trolls and doing a piss poor job of it too. There you go with that foul mouth of yours again Douggie. It makes your arguments just SO compelling.
>I don't know where you live but it sure as hell isn't Queensland and you >sure as hell don't have a handle on the Cyclone that was off the coast when >I put back my plans to sail. But then don't let facts interfere with your >story... You are obviously getting your rocks off on it. No Douggie, the headline story isn't the weather AS SUCH; it's your self-aggrandising nonsense about how you ran the risk of "sailing into the eye of a (non-existent) cyclone". Try to stay on track, Douggie. Perhaps the yellow pills will help?
Fred - 11 Mar 2007 00:24 GMT > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something you've > never seen and will never get to see. You have to actually produce some photography and so far your efforts fall far short.
What's it like living in Doug land?
D-Mac - 11 Mar 2007 00:49 GMT : > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something you've : > never seen and will never get to see. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : : What's it like living in Doug land? The man with all the posts deleted raises his ugly head from the marsh again. Where's the link to your photos Fred? Oh, darn... You don't care to share, do you?
Douglas
Rob - 11 Mar 2007 02:42 GMT > : > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something > you've [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Douglas Hey Doug when are you going to post my images up on your site?
r
D-Mac - 11 Mar 2007 05:43 GMT : > : > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something : > you've [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] : : r Good one Rob... Just work with me here mate... Where did you say they were again?
Rob - 11 Mar 2007 06:43 GMT > : > : > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something > : > you've [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > Good one Rob... Just work with me here mate... Where did you say they were > again? There are a few up on web sites, printed matter and AV's. Sadly I do not hold the copyright.
Want me to send you some others
Fred - 11 Mar 2007 10:24 GMT > : > What the f.ck are you on about child... My photography is something > you've [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Douglas My alter ego has produced some quality pictures if you are so smart you can find them. In the meantime where are yours?
Annika1980 - 10 Mar 2007 14:34 GMT > >Not where I got the info but it served the point for pulling you up short. > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > the info", but perhaps it's from some sooper-sekret weather service > which is able to add detail to forecasts retrospectively. Well, they were calling for THUNDERSTORMS in Florida that day. And it was SNOWING in other parts of the world. You don't expect D-Mac to sail into the eye of a SNOWSTORM, do ya?
Annika1980 - 10 Mar 2007 14:30 GMT > Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue > services before you even slipped your moorings I think that in many ways, D-Mac has already slipped his moorings.
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 20:57 GMT >> Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue >> services before you even slipped your moorings > >I think that in many ways, D-Mac has already slipped his moorings. Indeed. The sad remains of a once-great photographer. ("Great" in what's left of Douggie's mind, anyway.)
D-Mac - 10 Mar 2007 22:30 GMT : >> Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue : >> services before you even slipped your moorings [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : Indeed. The sad remains of a once-great photographer. ("Great" in : what's left of Douggie's mind, anyway.) It seems to me I hit a nerve while aiming at your stupidity.
Good shot, eh?
Alan K. - 10 Mar 2007 23:57 GMT >: >> Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue >: >> services before you even slipped your moorings [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Good shot, eh? If in your sad, twisted little mind you think so, Douggie. But, alas, ONLY in your sad, twisted little mind. How's the cyclone today, still pumping a lot of wind and noise? Much like yourself, really.
Fred - 11 Mar 2007 00:30 GMT > : >> Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue > : >> services before you even slipped your moorings [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Good shot, eh? Nope you missed by a longshot. Doug if anyone tried to shoot you in the head they would still miss your brain by a foot.
D-Mac - 11 Mar 2007 00:50 GMT : > : >> Or perhaps not; if you did that they'd need to call the air-sea rescue : > : >> services before you even slipped your moorings [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] : Doug if anyone tried to shoot you in the head they would still miss your : brain by a foot. Make sure you're not standing behind me then... Liking the back seat the way you do.
|
|
|