Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

(February, 19th) Samba time !

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Daniel Rocha - 20 Feb 2007 05:12 GMT
Hello,

It's time for a new picture !

http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/

Regards,

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

Fred - 20 Feb 2007 12:42 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Regards,

Not bad for a change.
Nothing seems overblown in terms of exposure but it is bright!
Best effort yet.
There is a steady improvement in your photos and removing the whole
arrogant picture of the week crap is making a difference as well.
And your photos sh.t all over our number 1 professional wedding photographer
Daniel Rocha - 20 Feb 2007 20:43 GMT
>> http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
> Not bad for a change.
> Nothing seems overblown in terms of exposure but it is bright!
> Best effort yet.
> There is a steady improvement in your photos and removing the whole

There is no improvement, but the kind of picture give to you,
this thought.

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

Faded Glory - 20 Feb 2007 22:06 GMT
>>> http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
>> Not bad for a change.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> There is no improvement,

Ok, you know best

but the kind of picture give to you,
> this thought.
Fred - 20 Feb 2007 23:45 GMT
>>> http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
>> Not bad for a change.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> There is no improvement,
Yes there is improvement.
this one is in focus for starters and better framed than some of your
previous crap efforts.
It's obvious that the one time a person praises your efforts you sh.t on
them.
fine.

> but the kind of picture give to you,
> this thought.

can you please rewrite this as it makes no sense.
Daniel Rocha - 21 Feb 2007 05:21 GMT
> It's obvious that the one time a person praises your efforts you sh.t
> on them.
> fine.

Curious way to consider "there is no improvement"....
As you want.

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

Fred - 21 Feb 2007 10:59 GMT
>> It's obvious that the one time a person praises your efforts you sh.t
>> on them.
>> fine.
>
> Curious way to consider "there is no improvement"....
> As you want.

You make no f.cking sens and have not answered my questions at all.
You also snipped what i have said.
A pox on you.
Daniel Rocha - 23 Feb 2007 20:00 GMT
>> but the kind of picture give to you,
>> this thought.
>
> can you please rewrite this as it makes no sense.

Sorry I have not seen the question previously.

This picture is close to your standard of photography.
It's why for your eyes, it's an improvement.

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

Fred - 24 Feb 2007 04:25 GMT
>>> but the kind of picture give to you,
>>> this thought.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> It's why for your eyes, it's an improvement.
> t

Exactly what is my "standard of photography"?
One that is in focus?
One that's well exposed without blown highlights?
One that captures a moment perfectly well?
One that displays good technique?
then yes
But in your case all those things are an exception.
This particular photo of yours was very very good and therefore an
improvement on your other offerings and not just in my eyes.
Accept the compliment.
Joan - 24 Feb 2007 04:32 GMT
Given his language difficulty and looking at the context, I think he
may have meant your "style" of photography.

Signature

Joan
http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly

: Exactly what is my "standard of photography"?
: One that is in focus?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
: This particular photo of yours was very very good and therefore an
: improvement on your other offerings and not just in my eyes.

: > Sorry I have not seen the question previously.
: >
: > This picture is close to your standard of photography.
: > It's why for your eyes, it's an improvement.
: > t
: Accept the compliment.
Fred - 24 Feb 2007 07:28 GMT
> Given his language difficulty and looking at the context, I think he
> may have meant your "style" of photography.

He doesn't know my style so that's what makes him more arrogant in his
approach.
I honestly think his last effort is a very good one and he still can't
accept it.
Weird little man our Daniel.
Maybe i'll just keep calling his work crap even when not deserved.
Daniel Rocha - 24 Feb 2007 22:59 GMT
> He doesn't know my style so that's what makes him more arrogant in his
> approach.
> I honestly think his last effort is a very good one and he still can't
> accept it.

It's not my last effort. I take this picture more than one year ago.

> Weird little man our Daniel.
> Maybe i'll just keep calling his work crap even when not deserved.

You can consider it as you want ! I hope to interest you more in the
future.

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

Fred - 25 Feb 2007 01:53 GMT
>> He doesn't know my style so that's what makes him more arrogant in his
>> approach.
>> I honestly think his last effort is a very good one and he still can't
>> accept it.
>
> It's not my last effort. I take this picture more than one year ago.
Is this or is it not your latest photo post here?
If you don't have a decent grip of the English language the try to
attain a better understanding before you say something stupid like above.

>> Weird little man our Daniel.
>> Maybe i'll just keep calling his work crap even when not deserved.
>
> You can consider it as you want ! I hope to interest you more in the
> future.
Oh you interest me for sure.
Daniel Rocha - 25 Feb 2007 10:48 GMT
> > It's not my last effort. I take this picture more than one year ago.
> Is this or is it not your latest photo post here?

Last photo posted here, but not the latest one, taken. It's why I
don't
consider it as an improvement, of any photographic skill.

--
<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com
Fred - 25 Feb 2007 23:25 GMT
>>> It's not my last effort. I take this picture more than one year ago.
>> Is this or is it not your latest photo post here?
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
>  http://www.monochromatique.com

So what you must be telling me then that if this is your best effort
then you have gone backwards?????
Daniel Rocha - 24 Feb 2007 22:58 GMT
>> This picture is close to your standard of photography.
>> It's why for your eyes, it's an improvement.

> Exactly what is my "standard of photography"?
> One that is in focus?
> One that's well exposed without blown highlights?
> One that captures a moment perfectly well?
> One that displays good technique?
> then yes

Yes.

This point draw your standard of photography.

> But in your case all those things are an exception.
> This particular photo of yours was very very good and therefore an
> improvement on your other offerings and not just in my eyes.
> Accept the compliment.

You know what ? I think the picture has 2 or 3 negative points.

Who cares ?!

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

kosh - 21 Feb 2007 08:19 GMT
> Hello,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Regards,

you managed to capture a great moment with a genuine expression.

capturing a moment does not mean you always have time to get eceryting
right..... but if you did, a higher viewpoint would have been nice to
get rid of the distracting roof, and fill the frame with the other samba
people!

colour?!?!?!?!

kosh
kosh - 21 Feb 2007 08:37 GMT
, a higher viewpoint would have been nice to
> get rid of the distracting roof, and fill the frame with the other samba
> people!

perhaps even try a shot holding the camera over your head shooting down?
a bit hit and miss..... but when it's a hit!!!!!!

kosh
Daniel Rocha - 23 Feb 2007 20:02 GMT
>> http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/
> you managed to capture a great moment with a genuine expression.

Thanks.

> capturing a moment does not mean you always have time to get eceryting
> right.....

For sure :)

> but if you did, a higher viewpoint would have been nice to
> get rid of the distracting roof, and fill the frame with the other
> samba people!

I understand what you want. but it's impossible.
it was for me a great time to see what this samba school called
Batala can do. And it's impressive !

> colour?!?!?!?!

Yes... Sometimes... :)

Signature

<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <>
http://www.monochromatique.com

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.