Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / February 2007

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Stereo 3D photography capture and view stereoscopic still and motion

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
matheworman@gmail.com - 17 Feb 2007 21:35 GMT
http://www.tyrell-innovations-usa.com/shack3d/productinfo/jpsBrown/jpsBrownInfo.htm

http://tyrell-innovations-usa.com/shack3d/
Annika1980 - 17 Feb 2007 22:00 GMT
Speaking of 3D stereo imaging, here are my first two attempts at
creating a stereo 3D image.  To view them in "3D" try looking at them
crosseyed.
One way to do this is to put your finger up in front of your nose and
focus on that.  Then you should see a 3rd image between the other
two.  Let your eyes focus on that center image.
This is still a work in progress for me.  I'll be doing more
experimentation with this technique as I learn more about it.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74458391/original
Jeff R. - 17 Feb 2007 23:17 GMT
> Speaking of 3D stereo imaging, here are my first two attempts at
> creating a stereo 3D image.  To view them in "3D" try looking at them
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74458391/original

Nicely done. They "snap" in quickly and neatly.
Good separation - not too much, like so many of my first attempts.

How much separation did you use?  One camera or two?

--
Jeff R.
Annika1980 - 18 Feb 2007 00:54 GMT
> >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> How much separation did you use?  One camera or two?

My method wasn't too scientific.  I don't have a stereo camera and I
knew that using two different cameras would be next to impossible, so
I was going to have to take two photos with the same camera.  I
figured (correctly as it turns out) that the lens should be about eye-
width apart for the two shots.  I had no bracket or gauge to use, and
I was handholding the camera, so what to do?  Well, I figured that my
eyes aren't gonna change their spacing so if I held my head very still
and took one photo looking through the viewfinder with the left eye
and (without moving) shot the other while looking through the
viewfinder with my right eye it might work.

Here's one I just made a few minutes ago while cooking tonight's
steaks.
http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74496087/original
Wilba - 18 Feb 2007 01:09 GMT
>>> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> steaks.
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74496087/original

They are remarkably good given the crudeness of your technique (I mean that
as a compliment :-). Well done. I'll have to have a go.
Jeff R. - 18 Feb 2007 01:27 GMT
>> >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> steaks.
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74496087/original

Very nice indeed.
I have frequently used the "take-one-shot; rock-to-the-left; take-the-next"
technique (the 3D cognoscente have a name for that technique, which I
forget), but it never ocurred to me to *literally* use each eye alternately.
Thanks for the idea.

Did you see my super-sophisticated setup:
http://www.mendosus.com/jpg/stereo-rig.jpg  (posted earlier).
I built this 'cause I wanted (still do) to capture moving subjects.  Works a
treat!
I used to use (pre-digital) two identical AE-1's, but, boy, was that bulky!
This little Nikon setup is most satisfactory - though a little too widely
spaced for close shots.

http://www.mendosus.com/jpg/pups-1.jpg
http://www.mendosus.com/jpg/pups-2.jpg
http://www.mendosus.com/jpg/ia-lawn-1.jpg

These hurt my old eyes a bit.
Distant shots work better.  Fun, 'though!

--
Jeff R.
Rob - 18 Feb 2007 02:01 GMT
>>>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> steaks.
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74496087/original

This one is not so good I can only get a narrow strip down the centre.

Think you may have shifted you eyes and not the camera.
Jeff R. - 18 Feb 2007 02:44 GMT
>> Here's one I just made a few minutes ago while cooking tonight's
>> steaks.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Think you may have shifted you eyes and not the camera.

Nay - its fine.
Try again.

--
Jeff R.
Smee R11S - 18 Feb 2007 02:45 GMT
>>>> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> This one is not so good I can only get a narrow strip down the centre.

Worked perfectly for me.
everything was clear as a bell.
Annika1980 - 18 Feb 2007 16:42 GMT
> Worked perfectly for me.
> everything was clear as a bell

Here's another one I just made that is best viewed using the crosseyed-
eyes technique. It also helps if you are an arm's length away from the
monitor.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74522523/original
k - 19 Feb 2007 11:15 GMT
| > >http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
| >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
| >
| > How much separation did you use?  One camera or two?

here's my rig - matched bods synched with the electric release and a matched
pair of 19-35's :)
http://members.iinet.net.au/~shahjen@iinet.net.au//images/ebay/Stereo.jpg

k
Rob - 18 Feb 2007 01:58 GMT
> Speaking of 3D stereo imaging, here are my first two attempts at
> creating a stereo 3D image.  To view them in "3D" try looking at them
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74458391/original

I can get both,stereo quite good, full frame with the black boarder.

r
Jeff R. - 18 Feb 2007 02:46 GMT
>> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> r

Hehe
If you have a black border *all* the way 'round the combined stereo image,
then *run* - don't walk - to the optometrist.
On the top and the bottom - fine - but the left and right sides will be the
L&R images (duh).

--
Jeff R.
Rob - 18 Feb 2007 22:32 GMT
>>>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/74453424/original
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> --
> Jeff R.

As I said I get a black border all around the image. Yes there are the
images outside that. Whereas I can only get the centre section of the
other images to 3D the ones with the white around them.

Both the dog and cat are fine, can't get the backyard into 3D.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.