 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / February 2007(February, 4th) New picture
Hello, It's time for a new picture. http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/ Regards, -- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >Regards, Ummm, I think the top half is so much better than the bottom. I would have cropped out all that uninteresting detail in the bottom of the frame. >> Hello, >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > have cropped out all that uninteresting detail in the bottom of the > frame. Is it upside down? >> Hello, >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > have cropped out all that uninteresting detail in the bottom of the > frame. HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA It is upside down >>Hello, >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > have cropped out all that uninteresting detail in the bottom of the > frame. 1. I love the fact you didn't call it THE picture of the week.... much more humble approach! 2. I would agree the need to crop.... not sure how... it seems quite lopsided.... possibly first to remove the positive image of the people... just use the reflections... and a bit of the negative space at the top of the frame..... which is good, but overwhelming. kosh > 1. I love the fact you didn't call it THE picture of the week.... much > more humble approach! On the html page is wrote "each monday a new photo". It's clear, in fact. Or I hope. > 2. I would agree the need to crop.... not sure how... it seems quite > lopsided.... possibly first to remove the positive image of the > people... just use the reflections... and a bit of the negative space at > the top of the frame..... which is good, but overwhelming. Crop the picture is a possibility. But in fact I like to see the positive image of people walking in the street. But cutting this part is logical for me to get more unreal look. -- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> 1. I love the fact you didn't call it THE picture of the week.... much >> more humble approach! [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com No matter what you do to that picture it will not work. I would just delete it and start again. > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Very nice Daniel you stupid truffle eating froggy c.nt. http://www.plus613.net/image/36865 >Very nice Daniel you stupid truffle eating froggy c.nt. >http://www.plus613.net/image/36865 Gordon isn't prejudiced - he gets off by abusing EVERYONE.....indicative of a very, very damaged psyche..... Why DO you only post to aus.photo ? Wy not inflict your art on everybody ? > Why DO you only post to aus.photo ? he doesn't > Wy not inflict your art on everybody ? because he takes a special pleasure in upsetting the freaking racists in this newsgroup? > Why DO you only post to aus.photo ? > Wy not inflict your art on everybody ? If you take the time to look you`ll see he also posts to alt.photography. But over there they have enough sense to ignore him. Simmo > If you take the time to look you`ll see he also posts to alt.photography. > But over there they have enough sense to ignore him. > Simmo ?? when I looked it only shows aus.photo , but if he posts elsewhere then sorry......... >> If you take the time to look you`ll see he also posts to alt.photography. >> But over there they have enough sense to ignore him. >> Simmo > > ?? when I looked it only shows aus.photo , but if he posts elsewhere then > sorry......... He posts in rec.photo.equipment.35mm as well, so he seems to be multi-posting as distinct from cross-posting. Multi-posting is not looked on with favour, even less than cross-posting. Colin D.  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > > ?? when I looked it only shows aus.photo , but if he posts elsewhere then > > sorry......... > > He posts in rec.photo.equipment.35mm as well, so he seems to be > multi-posting as distinct from cross-posting. Multi-posting is not > looked on with favour, even less than cross-posting. yeah, I'm sure he's basically into crime. Maybe even a terrorist? . . . sheesh... Yup, that must be it!! we'll have to ban this group and lock him up for at least 5 years Regards George B >> > ?? when I looked it only shows aus.photo , but if he posts elsewhere >> > then [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > . > sheesh... > Why DO you only post to aus.photo ? > Wy not inflict your art on everybody ? I post in several newsgroups. Another thing ? -- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Erm.....................???? |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.