 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / February 2007(January, 29th) Picture of the week
Hello, A new picture in this week http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/ Regards,  Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com What can I say Daniel, I have seen several good pictures from but this one is just boring. I get nothing from it, apart from the lady the rest is bland and boring. Is this truely your picture of the week, which means this is your best. You must have taken better over the last week. Is your picture of the week taken in the last week or are you like that other wierdo that posts here that claims his KPOTW is a picture of the week but one showed Bob Hawke as PM of Australia opening the Sydney Harbor Tunnel. (Actually go to his picture page and you will see naked pictures of his Aboriginal wife giving birth in the home bath.) Are you shooting with a film or digital camera? If it is digital most of these camera's have a little icon of a garbage bin and when you take a crap picture you can delete it right away. This works well for several porposes, firstly these shots never make it past your camera and secondly they never make it to the internet for people to think think your normally high standards have slipped to a below par quality. How is your brother going with his photo's? He seems to show a bit of promise. > Hello, > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com > Is this truely your picture of the week, which means this is your > best. > You must have taken better over the last week. You might think so, but with Daniel it is very doubtful unfortunately MrT. >>Is this truely your picture of the week, which means this is your >>best. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > MrT. perhaps this is daniels effort at candid street photogrphy not wanting tro be interpreted as an up-skirt shot ;) kosh > What can I say Daniel, I have seen several good pictures from but this > one is just boring. I get nothing from it, apart from the lady the > rest is bland and boring. I accept it. > Is this truely your picture of the week, which means this is your > best. On the page it's "each monday a new photo". > You must have taken better over the last week. Is your picture of the > week taken in the last week or are you like that other wierdo that > posts here that claims his KPOTW is a picture of the week but one > showed Bob Hawke as PM of Australia opening the Sydney Harbor Tunnel. The picture of the week depend of the shoots taken last time. > Are you shooting with a film or digital camera? Film based cameras (24x36 and 6x6) > If it is digital most > of these camera's have a little icon of a garbage bin and when you > take a crap picture you can delete it right away. As you cant. If you don't like them, do not return to the website. When I see a website with pictures that I dislike I forget the link. --- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> What can I say Daniel, I have seen several good pictures from but this >> one is just boring. I get nothing from it, apart from the lady the [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > As you cant. If you don't like them, do not return to the website. > When I see a website with pictures that I dislike I forget the link. The only problem with the rest of us using this theory is you keep giving us the link every Monday making it very hard to forget. I give you a challenge, start doing your post of the week but leave off the link and see how many visit. > The only problem with the rest of us using this theory is you keep > giving us the link every Monday making it very hard to forget. > > I give you a challenge, start doing your post of the week but leave > off the link and see how many visit. I'll study the question. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com : Hello, : [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : : Regards, Are we supposed to be seeing the texture of the subject's hair or is there a plastic covering over it with no texture to see? When the subject matter is bland, fine detail may add a point or two in credits. Somehow I don't see much in this particular image to award credits for. This is one photograph where the rule of thirds should have been ignored and more attention to detail should have been taken. The distortion from your lens, Daniel, is detracting from what should have been a symmetrical pattern in the paving. If they were all distorted at the same amount it may not have been so bad but I am sorry to say this is not one of your better pictures. As an aside Daniel... The rule of thirds which is a rule made to be broken, was devised when artists had absolute control over the elements of a picture. Photographs do sometimes benefit from using this rule but it by no means governs composition of a photograph the way it governs composition of a painting. The people who defined rules of composition were masters of seeing light and shade, adding objects and resizing existing objects to make their pictures what they are. Photographers are lucky if they can even recognize subtle shade, much less harness it to their advantage. It would be nice if you shot more naturally lit images and discovered how to harness shadows as a picture element. SignatureFrom Douglas... Wedding and Portrait specialist: http://www.photosbydouglas.com Canvas prints and Digital enlargements: http://www.canvasphotos.com.au Wedding Photography anywhere on the east coast of Australia. >I am sorry to say this is not one of your better pictures. Which one *was* "one of his better pictures"? :-) MrT. >>I am sorry to say this is not one of your better pictures. > > Which one *was* "one of his better pictures"? :-) Daniel.... I have to agree with the others. This photo SUCKS. All your photos SUCK. Infact - you suck. I honestly don't think you have any chance as a photographer at all - YOU ARE SIMPLY THAT BAD. Your brother certainly has more promise than your crap efforts. I hope this helps you. > I have to agree with the others. This photo SUCKS. All your photos SUCK. > Infact - you suck. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Your brother certainly has more promise than your crap efforts. Blabla... > I hope this helps you. As always... You imagine... -- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> I have to agree with the others. This photo SUCKS. All your photos SUCK. >> Infact - you suck. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com I have a question for you, it is a decent question and I request a decent answer. You post your POTW to aus.photo each Monday, you then reply Tuesday to either thank the people that said it was good and the ones that tell the knockers to shut up and you reply dribble to those that say your picture is sh.t or tell you how to improve. We don't see the name Daniel Rocha in our group again till the following monday. Personally I think this is the reason so many people put sh.t on you. Why don't you ever comment on the pictures posted by other members of the group? And before anyone tries the old 'no one else ever posts their pics' have a look over the last 2 weeks their has been a lot of comet pictures, which were all great but did Daniel ever say wow that is a great shot or you could improve by ..... No! I think you need to start contributing a bit more to aus.photo Daniel in regards to other people posts or you will keep copping this sh.t > I think you need to start contributing a bit more to aus.photo Daniel in > regards to other people posts or you will keep copping this sh.t Oh yes ! Great idea ! I must contributing to aus.photo and everybody will found my pictures great ! Thanks for the idea ! :) -- <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> I think you need to start contributing a bit more to aus.photo Daniel in >> regards to other people posts or you will keep copping this sh.t [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Thanks for the idea ! :) Here's another idea frog boy...f.ck off out of aus.photo! You are not welcome. > Here's another idea frog boy...f.ck off out of aus.photo! You are not > welcome. Now I know. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> I think you need to start contributing a bit more to aus.photo Daniel in >> regards to other people posts or you will keep copping this sh.t [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Thanks for the idea ! :) I think you have just proved yourself the fuckwit most have commented that you are. At no stage did I say everyone would find your pictures great but a lot of the sh.t would stop with your threads if you added more to the group. I suggest those that don't like your posts killfile you and those that reply to you do the same to them. I tried to help you but you wanted to be a smart arse. NFO > I think you have just proved yourself the fuckwit most have commented > that you are. Don't you see the smile ?! Too bad. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com : > I think you have just proved yourself the fuckwit most have commented : > that you are. : : Don't you see the smile ?! Too bad. Daniel... If you stop posting here in aus.photo, the traffic statistics for the group will drop by at least 30%. So why not just put your foil helmet on, set your browser to read only French and run the gauntlet? eh! The world need dedicate people and in the big picture it matters not the slightest if their work is good or bad just so long as they keep at it. Most really brilliant artists never get recognized in their own time. Who would have thought the obnoxious womanising, drunkard... Picasso, would ever be recognized, much less admired? Don't let then win Daniel. They'll only gain strength if you do and then they'll do it to everyone. SignatureFrom Douglas... Wedding and Portrait specialist: http://www.photosbydouglas.com Canvas prints and Digital enlargements: http://www.canvasphotos.com.au Wedding Photography anywhere on the east coast of Australia. "Doug MacDonald" <photosbydouglas-groups@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message news:KuWvh.955 > The world need dedicate people and in the big picture it matters not the > slightest if their work is good or bad just so long as they keep at it. > Most > really brilliant artists never get recognized in their own time. Who would > have thought the obnoxious womanising, drunkard... Picasso, would ever be Now I have f.cking head everything!!! Comparing Daniel to Picasso?!?!? Are you for real!? What f.cking planet are you from?! Telling Daniel he has the potential to become the next Picasso is really not helping this moron's ego. In reality, Daniel would BE EXTREMELY LUCKY to EVER get 999th place out of a1000th place comp. Don't insult Picasso (dead or not) by comparing to Daniel. Ive also hurt myself from falling off my chair with laughter - so please stop with your offensive comments. And Daniel....a message for you.....YOU SUCK...don't forget it frog boy. > And Daniel....a message for you.....YOU SUCK...don't forget it frog > boy. Braindead, you are. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> And Daniel....a message for you.....YOU SUCK...don't forget it frog >> boy. > > Braindead, you are. Why do you only ever reply to your own thread? > Why do you only ever reply to your own thread? In the past I answered to other threads and received the same "welcome". No change. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> Why do you only ever reply to your own thread? > > In the past I answered to other threads Proof? >> In the past I answered to other threads > Proof? You'll probably found if you search. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >>> In the past I answered to other threads >> Proof? > > You'll probably found if you search. Nope YOU have to provide the evidence. >>>> In the past I answered to other threads >>> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Nope YOU have to provide the evidence. actually I saw one effort over a 2 or 3 day period... some months ago. it lasted as long as the interest in one of Daniel's photos.... and the commnets were equally useful! kosh > Daniel... > If you stop posting here in aus.photo, the traffic statistics for the > group will drop by at least 30%. So why not just put your foil helmet > on, set your browser to read only French and run the gauntlet? eh! Well... > The world need dedicate people and in the big picture it matters not > the slightest if their work is good or bad just so long as they keep [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > Don't let then win Daniel. They'll only gain strength if you do and > then they'll do it to everyone. You know what. I'm not considering myself as an artist, or a photograph. Thanks for your support. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com >> Daniel... >> If you stop posting here in aus.photo, the traffic statistics for the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Thanks for your support. you are correct you are neither a photographer or an artist. Well actually you are an artist, a BULLSHIT artist. > : Hello, > : [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > more naturally lit images and discovered how to harness shadows as a picture > element. Would have been easier if you just said it was yet another crap photo. : > : Hello, : > : [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] : > : : > : Regards, SNIPPED : Would have been easier if you just said it was yet another crap photo. ----- Maybe for you Fred but the guy is a dedicated and persistent Photographer. He's also determined and self funded. He needs to improve the pictures he posts in some areas. He did have a nice photo last time. I think it's terribly un-Australian to just slam him outright. I'll bet you have discarded more photos than you've kept so don't be so quick to post nasty comments lest you be called to judgment yourself. Keep in mind too, he could have the cost of film and chemicals to cope with if he is still on film, which would limit his shooting. SignatureFrom Douglas... Wedding and Portrait specialist: http://www.photosbydouglas.com Canvas prints and Digital enlargements: http://www.canvasphotos.com.au Wedding Photography anywhere on the east coast of Australia. > : > : Hello, > : > : [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I think it's terribly un-Australian to just slam him outright. I think people now slam DR because when he's actually been given constructive crit. he ignores it. (or seems to) I'll bet you > have discarded more photos than you've kept so don't be so quick to post > nasty comments lest you be called to judgment yourself. Keep in mind too, > he > could have the cost of film and chemicals to cope with if he is still on > film, which would limit his shooting. >>: > : Hello, >>: > : [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] >>could have the cost of film and chemicals to cope with if he is still on >>film, which would limit his shooting. yep! also yep to persistent! kosh > : > : Hello, > : > : [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > could have the cost of film and chemicals to cope with if he is still on > film, which would limit his shooting. Dedicated or not but when he ignores constructive criticism and only responds when someone says 'oh how nice" then he deservs all the crap he gets. I have also posted positive comments on composition but in all reality his work is rubbish and does not deserve the tag "photo of the week" It's insulting to intelligent people. >> : > : Hello, >> : > : [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > his work is rubbish and does not deserve the tag "photo of the week" > It's insulting to intelligent people. been down the whole photo of the week path..... it was ignored! > Hello, > > A new picture in this week > > http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine/ looks oof. > Regards, ARE YOU SO f.cking STUPID TO REALISE WE DON'T WANT TO SEE YOUR STUIPD PHOTOS BECAUSE WE HATE FRENCH PEOPLE? f.ck OFF FRENCHY! > ARE YOU SO f.cking STUPID TO REALISE WE DON'T WANT TO SEE YOUR STUIPD > PHOTOS BECAUSE WE HATE FRENCH PEOPLE? f.ck OFF FRENCHY! or you could put it this way.... ÊTES-VOUS AINSI BAISER STUPIDE RÉALISEZ-VOUS QUE NOUS NE VOULONS PAS VOIR VOS PHOTOS DE STUIPD PUISQUE NOUS DÉTESTONS LES FRANÇAIS ? SE CASSENT LE FRANÇAIS ! > > ARE YOU SO f.cking STUPID TO REALISE WE DON'T WANT TO SEE YOUR STUIPD > > PHOTOS BECAUSE WE HATE FRENCH PEOPLE? f.ck OFF FRENCHY! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > VOIR VOS PHOTOS DE STUIPD PUISQUE NOUS DÉTESTONS LES FRANÇAIS ? SE > CASSENT LE FRANÇAIS ! ooooh-lah-lah... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.