> Love the shot, perhaps a touch more grain to give it that authentic b&w
> look?
What's wrong with an authentic B&W fine grain look?
Many of the best B&W photogs obsessed with large slow negative materials and
fine grain developers. Only if it was a very low light scene would I expect
to see obvious grain.
MrT.
Murray - 23 Sep 2006 09:41 GMT
Agree. Efke50 or 25 wouldn't have any visible grain
at such magnification. (given proper care in development)
I am using BlueFire now - there is no grain. It's a tiger
by the tail to use, but! :-)
Murray
>>Love the shot, perhaps a touch more grain to give it that authentic b&w
>>look?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> MrT.
Fred - 23 Sep 2006 15:17 GMT
>> Love the shot, perhaps a touch more grain to give it that authentic b&w
>> look?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> MrT.
It's a personal preference nothing more.
Each to their own.
>> Vietnam this week :)
>> http://www.pbase.com/mkelpie/image/67340653
>
> Love the shot, perhaps a touch more grain to give it that authentic b&w
> look?
How would this kid eating more grain make it a better picture??
Fred - 23 Sep 2006 15:18 GMT
>>> Vietnam this week :)
>>> http://www.pbase.com/mkelpie/image/67340653
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How would this kid eating more grain make it a better picture??
LOL
kosh - 25 Sep 2006 09:59 GMT
>>> Vietnam this week :)
>>> http://www.pbase.com/mkelpie/image/67340653
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> How would this kid eating more grain make it a better picture??
a great candid moment and expression captured, with very little
distracting clutter..... and great context with the hands.
ther is a rock in the open space to the top right..... I would be
tempted to burn that area in a touch to clean it up slightly..... or for
the non pureists... clone it out. that's just the minor background
though...... without touching it, it is a great shot!
kosh