 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / August 2006^T^'s Picture of the week ;-)
http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l I am not saying it is great but I like it. I was driving home from work on Tuesday and noticed the light on the water, I had my camera on the seat so I stopped and took a few. I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. > http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. I like the effect of the light. Where is it? Which stitching program did you use? Mine (Canon Photostitch) seems to get dark vertical sections at the joins. Easy to get rid of or just different/better software? Gerrit "Gerrit 't Hart" | Which stitching program did you use? Mine (Canon Photostitch) seems to get | dark vertical sections at the joins. Easy to get rid of or just | different/better software? try autostitch, it handles that edge banding really well. for a giggle once I pointed it at a random folder filled with all sorts of unfiled images, much to my surprise it popped up with a pic of my wife! a pano of the backyard with her in the middle. I had a look at all the files and sure enough, there were two pics of the backyard - nothing else *could* have been stitched but it found those two images and stuck them together ;) k >> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Gerrit Looks like it is explained here http://www.plus613.net/image/31709 Autopano Proo it says Doesn't say where it is >> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l >> [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Gerrit Thanks Gerrit It is take on the eastern side of Lake Macquarie just south of Newcastle I use Autopano pro for my stitching, the guy that sent the link to the pano of sydney had a link to it on his page. Very good program and you can get an unlicenced version but it puts logo's but still fun to play with > Thanks Gerrit > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Very good program and you can get an unlicenced version but it puts > logo's but still fun to play with Nice photo! I took this one last year at Belmont South (in the park just south of cold tea creek). I was driving home after visiting relatives in Newcastle when we saw the sunset. By the time I'd parked the car and got the camera out of the boot, the sun had set. http://www.shakesbeare.com/gallery/v/matts-photography/sun-moon/IMG_1739.jpg.html I didn't have my tripod, it was hand-held in low light - so it isn't the best photo. Still, better than no photo! Matt. >> Thanks Gerrit >> [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Matt. Thanks Matt The pano posted was from the same park. I think the tree on the left is the one in your pic. I noticed a few of Redhead beach, this is a morning one looking toward redhead http://www.plus613.net/image/28277 > I took this one last year at Belmont South (in the park just south of cold > tea creek). I was driving home after visiting relatives in Newcastle when we > saw the sunset. By the time I'd parked the car and got the camera out of the > boot, the sun had set. http://www.shakesbeare.com/gallery/v/matts-photography/sun-moon/IMG_1739.jpg .html > I didn't have my tripod, it was hand-held in low light - so it isn't the > best photo. Still, better than no photo! Maybe that's true, but why not simply post a different one, where you did have your tripod and better timing, instead? I can't see much point in posting pictures you have to apologise for myself*, but I guess you have a reason? (Actually I can, unique subjects of high interest that cannot be repeated. Hardly applies in this case though) MrT. >> I took this one last year at Belmont South (in the park just south of cold >> tea creek). I was driving home after visiting relatives in Newcastle when [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > MrT. Hey Mr T I think it was more of a case of showing me he had taken a sunset pic from the same spot as me > Hey Mr T > > I think it was more of a case of showing me he had taken a sunset pic > from the same spot as me Oh, OK I apologise if I missed that. MrT. > http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. Nice subtle tones, but I find the strangely diverging shorelines a bit distracting. > http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. It's excellent but a pity you didn't capture the shoreline. Great Pano. > http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. Nice shot Tems :-) I might post one of mine here for some critique remembering I have a point and shooter type camera, a HP R607, but hey I does the job until I can get something a bit more feature rich :-) OZ >> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l >> [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > OZ You could also take photo's of someone elses photo and post it as yours. You can get away with it because you actually pressed the button on the camera so it is your pic >>> http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l >>> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > You can get away with it because you actually pressed the button on the > camera so it is your pic I thought about doing that but then I remembered that I have ethical issues with doing that, as you can tell, I'm not a real estate agent because, not only can I spell "ethics" I understand and abide by them :-) Oz > http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=223619643&size=l > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I took 20 for this pano, no tripod. Thanks everyone and I would have taken the shore but as I said I wasn't really planning on doing anything special with the pic, I just thought it would be a good chance to experiment. Will do another this week a bit earlier to get more sunset light |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.