 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / General Photo Topics / Australian Photography / August 2006An Open apology to all aus.photo posters and Daniel Rocha
Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks and post a disgusting picture pretending to be Daniel. This was meant as an attempt at humour and in no way meant to cause any harm. I knew everyone would have picked up it wasn't the real daniel and had a laugh. I was wrong, I will unsubribe to this group and never return. Daniel, This was meant as a joke nothing more. I have stuck up for you in the past and thought I would annoy the people that pic on you with this post For this I am truly sorry. Keep up the posting of your pictures and don't let anyone of these 'people' stop you from taking these quality pictures. > Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks and post a > disgusting picture pretending to be Daniel. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Keep up the posting of your pictures and don't let anyone of these 'people' > stop you from taking these quality pictures. Im sure in time, and with faith, we and yourself will get over it. >> Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks and post a >> disgusting picture pretending to be Daniel. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Im sure in time, and with faith, we and yourself will get over it. Oh I was over it once i changed my name back the minute after I posted it. It was the thick accented woman at bigpond that said I should apologise. What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes it. I do an abvious joke and he complains to bigpond because the person who hangs sh.t on him tells him to. >>> Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks and post a >>> disgusting picture pretending to be Daniel. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > do an abvious joke and he complains to bigpond because the person who > hangs sh.t on him tells him to. Been drinking again? You have? > >>> Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks and post a > >>> disgusting picture pretending to be Daniel. [quoted text clipped - 24 lines] > > Been drinking again? Have you checked Google Groups. Daniel posts his links to other groups, and doesn't get much in return.  SignatureJoan http://www.flickr.com/photos/joan-in-manly : Oh I was over it once i changed my name back the minute after I posted it. : [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] : an abvious joke and he complains to bigpond because the person who hangs : sh.t on him tells him to. > What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading > people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes it. I do > an abvious joke and he complains to bigpond because the person who hangs > sh.t on him tells him to. Obvious joke to some people but to others it is offensive. Perhaps you could have been less offensive if you'd posted a picture of a dog turd. Ben > What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading > people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes > it. I do an abvious joke and he complains to bigpond because the > person who hangs sh.t on him tells him to. Are you drunk another time ? I have sent complains because someone used my name, on usenet. Signature<> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> http://www.monochromatique.com > > What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading > > people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > <> Daniel Rocha | Photographie <> > http://www.monochromatique.com Names are not copyright. As usenet is not moderated and does not require log in anyone can use any name. HTH >> > What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >> > people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > HTH Common decency dictates that it would be a reasonable thing to not do though don't you think, perhaps decency is not so common any more. >> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I have sent complains because someone used my name, on usenet. You sent complaints because you are a snivelling little french pooofter who can't take a joke or criticism. In Australia we don't take too kindly to little french Dobbers. f.cking cockspank. >>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > In Australia we don't take too kindly to little french Dobbers. > f.cking cockspank. Such a clever post from an anonymous gutless squeezer, it must make you feel so wuff and tuff you big tuff man you! >>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Such a clever post from an anonymous gutless squeezer, it must make you feel > so wuff and tuff you big tuff man you! I'm not anonymous I have always posted under this nick f.ck you very much. >>>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I'm not anonymous I have always posted under this nick f.ck you very much. Fill ya boots big fella! >>>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > I'm not anonymous I have always posted under this nick f.ck you very much. And such wonderfully constructive posts they have been you clever, clever man, your mum must be so proud. ;-) >>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > In Australia we don't take too kindly to little french Dobbers. > f.cking cockspank. and you make us all sound so good! with what some knobhead posted under his name... I think he has every right! judging by the harshness of the post.... it sounds like perhaps you may have been the original poster...... or a homophobe! >>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > judging by the harshness of the post.... it sounds like perhaps you may > have been the original poster...... or a homophobe! Neither, I'm just really pissed off with fuckheads like that cockspank playing crybabies to a person's isp because they had the "nerve' to poke a bit of fun at them. Some of you jackals really need a life. As for our french friend if he can't take the heat get out of the fire. He steals people's pictures and claims them as his which IMHO is far worse than what the OP of this thread has done. I wonder if someone complained to the advertising company about frenchie's thieving of their advertising and claiming it as his own? >>>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 27 lines] > I wonder if someone complained to the advertising company about frenchie's > thieving of their advertising and claiming it as his own? LOL. Waiting for the day we can see some of your magnificent work to show us all how it is done. > Neither, I'm just really pissed off with fuckheads like that cockspank > playing crybabies to a person's isp because they had the "nerve' to poke > a bit of fun at them. Maybe, just maybe, the crap you call "fun" is not acceptable to others? Ever though of that, mental midget? > Some of you jackals really need a life. f.ck you. > As for our french friend if he can't take the heat get out of the fire. He doesn't have to and you're nothing that he should worry about. > He steals people's pictures and claims them as his which IMHO is far > worse than what the OP of this thread has done. Liar. He never did. > I wonder if someone complained to the advertising company about > frenchie's thieving of their advertising and claiming it as his own? BWAHAHA! Grow up... >> Neither, I'm just really pissed off with fuckheads like that cockspank >> playing crybabies to a person's isp because they had the "nerve' to poke [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > Liar. He never did. Yes he did. I suggest you go and re-read it punk. He is a theif. > Yes he did. > > I suggest you go and re-read it punk. > > He is a theif. He might be a theif, but that doesn't make him a thief. Learn to spell properly, K? Punk was your mother, you fuckwit. And no, he did NOT steal that photo or anyone else's. Learn to read proerly, moron. Furthermore: f.ck you and the lot like you who can't stand looking at other people's work. If you're so much better, then show why. Otherwise STFU, moron. >> Neither, I'm just really pissed off with fuckheads like that cockspank >> playing crybabies to a person's isp because they had the "nerve' to poke >> a bit of fun at them. > > Maybe, just maybe, the crap you call "fun" is not acceptable to > others? Ever though of that, mental midget? I didn't say I considered it fun, learn some comprehension moron. >> Some of you jackals really need a life. > > f.ck you. Touched a nerve I see. >> As for our french friend if he can't take the heat get out of the fire. > > He doesn't have to and you're nothing that he should worry > about. I'm just one of many sick of him thieving. >> He steals people's pictures and claims them as his which IMHO is far >> worse than what the OP of this thread has done. > > Liar. He never did. Do a Google search and all will be revealed. >> I wonder if someone complained to the advertising company about >> frenchie's thieving of their advertising and claiming it as his own? > > BWAHAHA! > > Grow up... I'm fine thank you. > I didn't say I considered it fun, learn some comprehension moron. If you don't consider it "fun", don't use that word to define what was done. It was not "fun" and you know it perfectly well. Stop weaseling out. > Touched a nerve I see. You're not intelligent enough to discern what a nerve is. > I'm just one of many sick of him thieving. He did not. > Do a Google search and all will be revealed. What will be revealed, arsehole? That you and a few other jealous fuckwits here decided he had stolen the photo and shouted so? Since when what you say makes it to "truth" as a given? Your definition of "stolen" would class as plagiarism ANY photo taken in a wide open space. >> I didn't say I considered it fun, learn some comprehension moron. > > If you don't consider it "fun", don't use that word to define > what was done. It was not "fun" and you know it perfectly well. > Stop weaseling out. Ever heard of the word context? >> Touched a nerve I see. > > You're not intelligent enough to discern what a nerve is. I've still touched a nerve. >> I'm just one of many sick of him thieving. > > He did not. Representing other people's work as his own is theft. >> Do a Google search and all will be revealed. > > What will be revealed, arsehole? That you and a few > other jealous fuckwits here decided he had stolen > the photo and shouted so? Since when what you say > makes it to "truth" as a given? Read above and the last thing I would be is jealous but thanks for playing. > Your definition of "stolen" would class as plagiarism > ANY photo taken in a wide open space. Nope only ones taken by others then attributed as their own original work like Frenchie has done with that billboard. Theft, plagiarism etc. Face it noons you are a boat floundering in a storm and defending frenchie and abusing others is just revealing the poor pathetic thing you are and have revealed to all and sunder. > Face it noons you are a boat floundering in a storm and defending > frenchie and abusing others is just revealing the poor pathetic thing > you are and have revealed to all and sunder. You're so full of sh.t it's almost an embarassment you call yourself Australian. The ONLY reason you lot are complaining about this guy is because he's French and you lot don't like "frogs", OK? A trait that defines the utter stupidity of your irrational fears. <plonk> >> Face it noons you are a boat floundering in a storm and defending >> frenchie and abusing others is just revealing the poor pathetic thing [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > <plonk> What a tosser thinking that the guy's nationality is the problem when it's plagiarism. Oh dear he plonked me. f.cking coward. Noons, why dont you shut ya mouth and move on mate.. I think the point was pretty obvious and had nothing to do with the guys nationality. More like stealing peoples work and calling it his own. Its dickheads like you that are the embarassment to Australians, go back to primary school and learn to read champ, and while your there, f.ck right off outa this forum... And as for the frenchman in the clown suit, you deserve everythin u get muppet... dont like it, go away... SignatureBenF > why dont you shut ya mouth and move on mate.. last time I looked, it wasn't me who started this sh.t thread. WTF do you think you are to tell me what I should do? Oh, right: you're bwanna, is it? f.ck off, then. > I think the point was pretty obvious and had nothing to do with the > guys nationality. More like stealing peoples work and calling it his > own. It did have to do with the nationality. From the start, these fuckwits did nothing else but use nationality "niceties" against this guy. "Frog" was one of many. In case you haven't noticed, the guy has a NAME. And it's not "frog". Don't you DARE say they weren't used: it's all in google for anyone who wants to check. I don't give a sh.t if they like his stuff, if someone claims it's stealing, whatever. As soon as his nationality is invoked with derogatory comments, the colour of the thread changes. To an ugly one that I don't care about. And I make my point about that very clear. If you don't like to hear it, then make darn sure no one here uses derogatory comments about ANYONE's nationality. Or else be prepared to hear the payback. In case you haven't noticed, no one died and gave you the right to say whatever you want unchecked. This place is a two way street: you dish it out, you better be prepared to cop it back. Don't like it? Well, it ain't gonna change... > Its dickheads like you that are the embarassment to Australians, go > back to primary school and learn to read champ, and while your there, > f.ck right off outa this forum... f.ck off, pissfart. Neither you nor any of the racist fuckwits in your trolley scare me or anyone else. Piss off, get lost and stay lost. Or beter yet: go back to your f.cking precious England and stay there. What's the matter, couldn't cope with Thatcher, diddums? Poor you... > And as for the frenchman in the clown suit, you deserve everythin u get > muppet... dont like it, go away... More proof, if that was needed. >> why dont you shut ya mouth and move on mate.. > [quoted text clipped - 47 lines] > > More proof, if that was needed. Wow I have just stumbled into this thread and I think you Noons are wrong. Do a google yourself and you will find that you have actually contradicted yourself in your defense of this obvious plagiarist. But so long as you are happy living your life nothing else matters. > Wow I have just stumbled into this thread and I think you Noons are wrong. Wow, Smee: I don't give a sh.t what you think. > Do a google yourself and you will find that you have actually > contradicted yourself in your defense of this obvious plagiarist. Do me a favour and stop insulting your own intelligence in public. OK? > But so long as you are happy living your life nothing else matters. For once, someone got it. >> Wow I have just stumbled into this thread and I think you Noons are wrong. > > Wow, Smee: I don't give a sh.t what you think. Yes you do otherwise you would not have bothered replying. >> Do a google yourself and you will find that you have actually >> contradicted yourself in your defense of this obvious plagiarist. > > Do me a favour and stop insulting your own intelligence > in public. OK? Why do i need to insult my intelligence when you are doing the insulting? Don't you know that you have lost all semblance of respectability as soon as you resort to abuse? Kudos for me and all the others who disagree with you. >> But so long as you are happy living your life nothing else matters. > > For once, someone got it. Like I said as long as you are happy living in your glass house. >>> Wow I have just stumbled into this thread and I think you Noons are >>> wrong. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Like I said as long as you are happy living in your glass house. Smee, please do what the rest of us in aus.photo do and killfile noons He is a racist troll who doesn't deserve a response. When he realises we all have him killfiled he will go away > f.ck off, pissfart. Neither you nor any of the racist > fuckwits in your trolley scare me or anyone else. > Piss off, get lost and stay lost. Or beter yet: go back > to your f.cking precious England and stay there. What's > the matter, couldn't cope with Thatcher, diddums? > Poor you... No...you f.ck off Noons. You have a go at him for bringing race into it - and what the f.ck do you do? "Or beter yet: go back to your f.cking precious England and stay there. " I, and many others who have contacted me about you, wish YOU would piss off. It's clear you are not welcome.....nor is the "french" thief. >> f.ck off, pissfart. Neither you nor any of the racist >> fuckwits in your trolley scare me or anyone else. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I, and many others who have contacted me about you, wish YOU would piss off. > It's clear you are not welcome.....nor is the "french" thief. Keep your cross-posting, irrelevant crap out of aus.tv IP Address recorded. -- aus.tv's new Group Moderator > Keep your cross-posting, irrelevant crap out of aus.tv IP Address > recorded. Here here...don't know why that turd posted it to aus.tv as well. LOL.. i do believe noons has been told. Now shoo fly and go lay your maggots somewhere else. SignatureBenF > Keep your cross-posting, irrelevant crap out of aus.tv > IP Address recorded. > > -- > aus.tv's new Group Moderator you haven't hijacked this pc for a while...what gives > You have a go at him for bringing race into it - and what the f.ck do you > do? > > "Or beter yet: go back to your f.cking precious England and stay there. " Exactly, piss head. Don't like it one bit, do you? Then, here is a hint: don't do it. Becauswe as long as you do, you cop it back in heaps. > I, and many others who have contacted me about you, wish YOU would piss off. f.ck off you and the many others, dickhead! Who do you think you are? > It's clear you are not welcome.....nor is the "french" thief. Wrong, dickhead. This is a PUBLIC group, not your little private club. You want to be treated in a civil and educated manner, YOU start by being so to EVERYONE else. Regardless of where they come from. Got it, you and the effing "others"? >>>> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >>>> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > judging by the harshness of the post.... it sounds like perhaps you may > have been the original poster...... or a homophobe! If some knobhead had posted as Daniel Rocha but not used his sig there wouldn't be a problem. Anyone could tell it wasn't the real Daniel it used a tinyurl and had a different email address. As someone else wrote, what if there were two Daniel Rocha's interested in photography?? Could one complain to the others ISP about the other ones mother using his name or do we let the oldest keep the name as they had it first? I think it is time to move on from this crap, Chock wasn't the first to impersonate Daniel and from what I understand they are doing it to show daniel that he is also impersonating someone by posting their work as his own. As this thread title states he has apologised and I think it is time to move on. >> What I found the funniest was Daniel sits here week after week reading >> people call him a loser and his photo skills are crap and he takes [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I have sent complains because someone used my name, on usenet. Least he apologised, he could have just said to the ISP he had just got a new wireless network and someone else in the building must have hooked into it. The ISP would have then said put a password on it. End of story. And BTW I am not the David Koch off TV > Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks Oh dear. Hands up all those never guilty of this... > I was wrong, I will unsubribe to this group and never return. No need. Even though I was one of those very critical of your post, I forgive and move on. Redeem yourself by being a better poster/contributor in future. I've made some bad moves before, but I *try* to learn... (O; >> Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks > Oh dear. Hands up all those never guilty of this... [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > poster/contributor in future. I've made some bad moves before, but I > *try* to learn... (O; Where the f.ck does it say you legally must post to a newsgroup with your own name? I can't see the problem with the guy imitating that Daniel poof. What would we ever do if there were say 2 "Jim Smiths" who posted? Is one of them going to be dobbed on cos some little sook gets upset? What if my name was "Fred" ? Does that mean I cant post to aus.photo cos we already have 1 "Fred" ? If my name was "Daniel" (how sad) - will I be reported for imitating a french poof? Daniel doesnt have copyright on his name...and I doubt any ISP would take a complaint of a crybaby saying "such and such stole my name..boo hoo". Telstra wouldnt respond that quick anyway! It takes them a minimum of 2 weeks to do anything. Bottom line is...if I wanna post under any particular given name...then I will - until someone can show me where it states I must legally post using my correct name? And if thats the case, Fred, Chock, Kelpie, Joan, kosh etc will all also be in voliation for not using their full name. My final point...if I think Daniel's photos suck - I'll say so. Im sick of those pussies around here not game enough to say what they think. Now can I be reported for giving my opinion on someone's plagerised work?! >>>Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks >> [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > those pussies around here not game enough to say what they think. Now can I > be reported for giving my opinion on someone's plagerised work?! I don't see anyone claiming you have to post under your proper name..... just not post mis-representation as someone else... especially such drivel and offensive filth! nothing wrong with anonymity..... but get some friggin ethics ! kosh > I don't see anyone claiming you have to post under your proper name..... > just not post mis-representation as someone else... especially such So what if there were 2 Jim Smiths? If they both post in the same newsgroup, then is one classed as "mis-representation" as you put it? For me to post under the name Daniel Rocha do you need to see my birth certificate? I was aware of any "rules" that said I can't use the online name Daniel Rocha? (not that anyone would want to - you'd be labelled a cheat) >>I don't see anyone claiming you have to post under your proper name..... >>just not post mis-representation as someone else... especially such [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > name Daniel Rocha? (not that anyone would want to - you'd be labelled a > cheat) get a friggin brain..... nobody EVER said you have to post under your own name...... but if some one said they liked little boys and were claiming to be you... I think you would have a pretty legitimate reason to be pissed off! do all of you people defending the right to claim they are someone else (and I am not talking about a nickname).. beleive it is your god given right to do anything and say anything on the internet with no ethics whatsoever? Or do you bag the hell out of people.... then change your username when everyone knows your a twat... I vist here to talk about photogrpahy.... I spend a few seconds typing out quick replies (as my typos can attest) and give the posts a quick scan.... playing the sockpuppet game actaully takes work and effort....... get a life! >>>>Last night I thought I would be funny after a few drinks >>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > > kosh Ahhhh so those ethics would also apply to Daniel Rocha, who has, on the odd occasion posted his "picture of the week" only to be fingered as a fraud for deliberately miss-representing the photo as some of his own work, I don't see any threads as longs as this one arguing the ethics of just such a thing, and I have been lurking and learning here for a while now. While I in no way condone the OP's action, I think its time a few here take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror, it will give them an idea as to what a hypocrite looks like. Oz >>I don't see anyone claiming you have to post under your proper name..... >>just not post mis-representation as someone else... especially such drivel [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > see any threads as longs as this one arguing the ethics of just such a > thing, and I have been lurking and learning here for a while now. then you will have noticed I was also bagging the hell out of him for doing this. > While I in no way condone the OP's action, I think its time a few here take > a good hard look at themselves in the mirror, it will give them an idea as > to what a hypocrite looks like. > Oz big difference posting porn on behalf of someone else....... >>>I don't see anyone claiming you have to post under your proper name..... >>>just not post mis-representation as someone else... especially such [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > then you will have noticed I was also bagging the hell out of him for > doing this. Actualy, I just looked at the August 8th thread from Daniel and I see your name is conspicuous by its absence :-) one post in the July 31st thread along the lines of a pat on the back, and then 3 in the July 28th thread, and all about the merits of setting up monitors. Oh and then we get to July 24th (does daniel know how long a week really is) and we finaly get some critisisim, but no, its not for the "Photo of the Week" its for some other pics buried in the site somewhere got a mirror handy ?? >> While I in no way condone the OP's action, I think its time a few here >> take a good hard look at themselves in the mirror, it will give them an >> idea as to what a hypocrite looks like. >> Oz > > big difference posting porn on behalf of someone else....... anyone with half a brain would realise that D R doesnt post using "TinyURL" and would probably clue on pretty fast that it was an attempt at humour, a pretty lame attempt none the less, I didnt get to see the offending picture as it was removed by the hosting web site, but I gather it was a PS job anyway. Oz > Actualy, I just looked at the August 8th thread from Daniel and I see your > name is conspicuous by its absence :-) [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > of the Week" its for some other pics buried in the site somewhere > got a mirror handy ?? why flog a dead horse... others had kicked the boots in quite sufficiently.... he should have gotten the point! actually.... if you looked a little harder..... a genuine critique, followed by the realisation it was not original..... and several related posts. in regard to a reply on the 8th... sorry, I have a life.... look at the 9th of August..... quote "photo's of photo's don't count" and something about taking photos of painings to become a painter! Anyway, all this because some twat was masquerading and posting porn under his name..... actually... whoever did the masquerade (i don't care to waste my time finding out) put Danieal back into a position of strength. His photo 'style' was being nicely berrated.... he was getting more and more isolated... and whoever whent and masqueraded under his name (intending to make him look stupid) resulted in people defending him.... all cause someone had to go and be silly rather than attack his lack of originality.....which had it coming! kosh > Where the f@(# does it say you legally must post to a newsgroup with your > own name? Nowhere. And I didn't say it either. Any need for the f-word - why so angry? > I can't see the problem with the guy imitating that Daniel poof. Do you run a business? What is its name? - because I'm going to start sending out stuff under that name in your area. OK with you? Strangely, inexplicably there are laws against that. Golly, I wonder why? > What would > we ever do if there were say 2 "Jim Smiths" who posted? What on earth does that have to do with it? The post was made by someone deliberately using another person's name and copying their signature. > What if my name was "Fred" ? Does that mean I cant post to aus.photo cos we > already have 1 "Fred" ? If my name was "Daniel" (how sad) - will I be > reported for imitating a french poof? Why do you repeat an irrelevant analogy? Re-stating it doesn't make your point any better. > Daniel doesnt have copyright on his name... Nor do I. I'm continually being mistaken for others with the same name. So what? > and I doubt any ISP would take a > complaint of a crybaby saying "such and such stole my name..boo hoo". I'm afraid you are completely wrong. ISP's look very dimly on people who deliberately use someone else's name in a way meant to mislead or discredit. Which is quite different to having the same name. > Telstra wouldnt respond that quick anyway! It takes them a minimum of 2 > weeks to do anything. Based on your personal experience with what section? (O; I don't like Telstra either, but they react quite quickly to ISP abuse. They have to, especially if it involves DOS attacks and the like. Are you accusing 'fake daniel' of lying? Why would he do that? > Bottom line is...if I wanna post under any particular given name...then I > will - until someone can show me where it states I must legally post using > my correct name? Shall we repeat the bleedingly obvious? You can call yourself *whatever* you like. But if you *masquerade* as someone else with a view to discredit them, then you are likely to be pulled up. That's why the losers who do this sort of thing regularly use anonymous reposting methods. Those that do post anonymously or change their name frequently have to accept and enjoy the respect that brings... (O; > And if thats the case, Fred, Chock, Kelpie, Joan, kosh etc > will all also be in voliation for not using their full name. Like I said, repeating it won't make it any more applicable... > My final point...if I think Daniel's photos suck - I'll say so. Im sick of > those pussies around here not game enough to say what they think. Gosh, how brave! I'm certainly impressed! > Now can I > be reported for giving my opinion on someone's plagerised (sic) work?! No. Did anyone say otherwise? Or *has* someone reported you for this? Why would you ask such a question then? Oh, I see, satire... (O: |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.