I bought this lens with my camera. It is a very good travelling lens,
as you don't have to change it often (and therefore less risk of
dust). I have found that it can be unflattering with some portraits,
as it seems to flatten out the subject toward the corners, especially
at the wider F stops like F4. They quite literally look like they
have been under a rolling pin.
Like all lenses though if you work within it's limitations you can get
excellent results. I use mine a lot, and it was definately worth it.
Certainly a better choice over the 18-55 bracket lenses for me.
The only other issue is filter size, for me it meant repurchasing a
range of filters for the lens, as I had nothing in that size.
I would never rely on it exclusively, but it's nearly always on the
camera.
Glenn
>any comments on this lens? Read some reviews and think it might be good
>value for the price and seems to the best for the range. Would appear that
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>thanks guys.
>Jasen
tlai909@visto.com - 28 Mar 2006 01:14 GMT
For critical work I'd step up to a EX series or one of the better
lenses from your parent company.
For general work, the 18-125 is good and better IMO than the 18-50 and
18-200.
For lucky Nikon people you can go the VR 18-200.