>> Of course to justify such a beast, you have to have the right kind of
>> glass
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Hmmm, exactly what part of all that is not the same as hauling around
> a MF film camera and all its gear, tripods, film, etc?
Indeed. In recent travels across China, I hauled 2 bodies, tons of Velvia,
7 Nikkor lenses, one carbon tripod, a laptop, extra hard drives, batteries
a-plenty and other 'necessary' accessories around. Almost didn't have room
for silly incidentals like clothing etc. (Next trip add an XPan.) :-)
Last year I almost dropped the lot in southern Vietnam crossing streams by
walking on very narrow boats. Would have made a great picture I'm sure -
thankfully the pleasure didn't eventuate.
Lord knows how I'd go with MF stuff.
> Ah yes: the bit about the 40Mb RAW file.
>
> High resolution is a great equalizer, isn't it? :)
Indeed. However, I suspect one would do well to ask the question "how much
resolution do I really need?". Of course this is like saying "my bike/car
has enough power". Noone in their right mind believes such a statement.
>> Back to my little 6.1Mb D100 and the handful of film bodies for a while
>> for
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> world of drum film scanning and you realize you need
> TWO mafia jobs!
Indeed. Those Imacon scanners (pseudo drum) are verrrrrry tasty. Are we
all afflicted with such desires?
> <resistance is futile, we have your bank account in our sights...>
Yes - I suspect you know exactly what I'm talking about here!
Cheers,
Dave E (Sydney)
Noons - 23 Nov 2005 12:43 GMT
> Indeed. In recent travels across China, I hauled 2 bodies, tons of Velvia,
> 7 Nikkor lenses, one carbon tripod, a laptop, extra hard drives, batteries
> a-plenty and other 'necessary' accessories around. Almost didn't have room
> for silly incidentals like clothing etc. (Next trip add an XPan.) :-)
Cripes, you're nearly as bad as I am!
I haul the f4, the fe2, 3 nikkors, 1 tamron, 1 rb67 and 180 lens
and a monster kenett benbo tripod.
Ah yes: overseas, I take the Canon video as well.
Folks around here know me as the nutter with the big
shoulder bags around the Northern beaches and parks
every weekend with good weather...
> Indeed. However, I suspect one would do well to ask the question "how much
> resolution do I really need?". Of course this is like saying "my bike/car
> has enough power". Noone in their right mind believes such a statement.
Exactly. V8s rule, I'm afraid! ;)
> Indeed. Those Imacon scanners (pseudo drum) are verrrrrry tasty. Are we
> all afflicted with such desires?
Worse, much worse, than chook flu...
> Yes - I suspect you know exactly what I'm talking about here!
<mumble,bankmanagers,grumble>...
David Springthorpe - 23 Nov 2005 22:30 GMT
>Exactly. V8s rule, I'm afraid! ;)
What is it they say - the bigger the car, the smaller the dick.....?
kosh - 24 Nov 2005 09:15 GMT
> >Exactly. V8s rule, I'm afraid! ;)
>
> What is it they say - the bigger the car, the smaller the dick.....?
good thing I always had a thing about the Leica M cameras! not ot
mention the Olympus XA !
Noons - 24 Nov 2005 09:54 GMT
> >Exactly. V8s rule, I'm afraid! ;)
>
> What is it they say - the bigger the car, the smaller the dick.....?
Yeah. That's why we all NEED to get that 180 f2.8:
everything helps.
And the more ppi that scanner does, the more
it can see into microscopic stuff...
POTD.com.au - 29 Nov 2005 07:55 GMT
> >Exactly. V8s rule, I'm afraid! ;)
>
> What is it they say - the bigger the car, the smaller the dick.....?
"they" being those who don't have one! :-)