Article by Fran Molloy in "The Age" predicts death of film again.
(Movie film too, it seems.)
<http://theage.com.au/articles/2005/09/21/1126982069009.html#>
Cheers, Phred.

Signature
ppnerkDELETE@THISyahoo.com.INVALID
> Article by Fran Molloy in "The Age" predicts death of film again.
> (Movie film too, it seems.)
>
> <http://theage.com.au/articles/2005/09/21/1126982069009.html#>
>
> Cheers, Phred.
Interesting article, anyone spot the mistake??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Clayton, who learnt his craft as a darkroom technician, still shoots his
personal work on film using a panoramic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>medium-format
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Hasselblad X-Pan.
Noons - 27 Sep 2005 13:52 GMT
Nikonf4 apparently said,on my timestamp of 27/09/2005 10:36 PM:
>> Article by Fran Molloy in "The Age" predicts death of film again.
>> (Movie film too, it seems.)
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Interesting article, anyone spot the mistake??
besides the one you pointed out, I just can't see what
the heck has the drop in movie theatre attendance got to do
with the demise of film photography and how can they possibly
be related.
But then again, it's The Age: anything is possible in that rag...

Signature
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
wizofoz2k@yahoo.com.au.nospam
Rob - 27 Sep 2005 14:01 GMT
>> Article by Fran Molloy in "The Age" predicts death of film again.
>> (Movie film too, it seems.)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> .
yep - they are not that size!
> .
> .
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> personal work on film using a panoramic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>medium-format
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Hasselblad X-Pan.
Adam F - 27 Sep 2005 14:11 GMT
X-Pan isn't MF?
//Adam F
>> Article by Fran Molloy in "The Age" predicts death of film again. (Movie
>> film too, it seems.)
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> personal work on film using a panoramic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>medium-format
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<Hasselblad X-Pan.