>>> Could it be that the D250 or the D300 will be next, and there won't
>>> be any more D200 bodies?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> That means there's *at least* another month before it's obsolete...
Nah... Not with Nikon...
Their product roll-out is slow as mollasses.
-But since you did say, "at least," I guess you'd be technically correct.
:)
no_name - 29 Jan 2006 14:27 GMT
>>>>Could it be that the D250 or the D300 will be next, and there won't
>>>>be any more D200 bodies?
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> -But since you did say, "at least," I guess you'd be technically correct.
> :)
Actually, what I want to know is when am I going to be able to get my
hands on a new 10.2MP Pentax *ist-D2?
Martin Francis - 29 Jan 2006 17:44 GMT
> Actually, what I want to know is when am I going to be able to get my
> hands on a new 10.2MP Pentax *ist-D2?
Put money on it being branded Samsung...
Martin
no_name - 30 Jan 2006 06:15 GMT
>>Actually, what I want to know is when am I going to be able to get my
>>hands on a new 10.2MP Pentax *ist-D2?
>
> Put money on it being branded Samsung...
>
> Martin
I dunno. I think the Pentax DSLR line will stay branded Pentax. The
digital P&S may become double branded; sold under both labels.
And the announcement of the joint venture or whatever seemed to indicate
Samsung would provide the sensor for a generation AFTER the *ist-D2
(actually the next generation of AF-645D).
Pentax hasn't actually said anything about a *ist-D2 AFAIK. I'm just
hoping based on the Nikon D100 & *ist-D used the same sensor chip &
Nikon's got a new 10.2MP camera using the same vendor's chip.
So hopefully Pentax ...
Matt Clara - 29 Jan 2006 15:15 GMT
>>>> Could it be that the D250 or the D300 will be next, and there won't
>>>> be any more D200 bodies?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Nah... Not with Nikon...
> Their product roll-out is slow as mollasses.
Perhaps you're just caught up in the Canon marketing machine?
;-)

Signature
Regards,
Matt Clara
www.mattclara.com
Mark² - 29 Jan 2006 20:57 GMT
>>>>> Could it be that the D250 or the D300 will be next, and there
>>>>> won't be any more D200 bodies?
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Perhaps you're just caught up in the Canon marketing machine?
> ;-)
Nah. I've got my gripes about Canon, too.
As for being caught up...I don't think so, since I'm still shooting with my
10D...having passed up all of their new bodies since then...and not due to
money issues. Canon has managed to get a lot of lens money during that
wait...but my lenses will be around long after my 10D retires. :)
I am keeping my eyes open for info on the 20D replacement, but it will have
to be pretty slick to make me jump.
Nicholas O. Lindan - 29 Jan 2006 22:26 GMT
> but my lenses will be around long after my 10D retires. :)
And us film dinosaurs keep the camera bodies around and
retire the lenses.
I hope your 10D's retirement will be voluntary.
--
Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio
Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics.
To reply, remove spaces: n o lindan at ix . netcom . com
Fstop timer - http://www.nolindan.com/da/fstop/index.htm
Mark² - 29 Jan 2006 23:37 GMT
>> but my lenses will be around long after my 10D retires. :)
>
> And us film dinosaurs keep the camera bodies around and
> retire the lenses.
>
> I hope your 10D's retirement will be voluntary.
It will be. More likely, it will become a backup body next to a +/-12mp
update at some point. I still shoot with my EOS 3 and Elan IIe, though with
diminishing frequency. I've "retired", sold, or given away my non-L lenses,
save for two that I think are in the same league of quality: 50 1.4 and 100
2.8 macro.