Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / December 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

As if anyone cares - more mediocrity

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
anonomous individual - 28 Dec 2005 01:14 GMT
The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)

So here's one of mine.
http://tecphoto.com.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=12

Signature

Anonymouse

punishspammers@NOSPAM.com - 28 Dec 2005 01:34 GMT
> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
> Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
>
> So here's one of mine.
> http://tecphoto.com.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=12

Well, that's a pretty cat.
Robert C. - 28 Dec 2005 01:37 GMT
> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
> Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
>
> So here's one of mine.
> http://tecphoto.com.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=12

Sleeping on the job?

How cute. I love the photograph. This is the type that make it to Hallmark
greeting cards.
anonomous individual - 28 Dec 2005 06:32 GMT
>>The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
>>Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> How cute. I love the photograph. This is the type that make it to Hallmark
> greeting cards.

How very observant of you Robert. :-)

Signature

Anonymouse?

Al Denelsbeck - 28 Dec 2005 23:52 GMT
>> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated
>> mediocrity. Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> How cute. I love the photograph. This is the type that make it to
> Hallmark greeting cards.

       "Your call is important to us. Please remain on the line and a
customer service representative will be..."

    - Al.

Signature

To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net

Alan Browne - 28 Dec 2005 18:16 GMT
> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
> Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
>
> So here's one of mine.
> http://tecphoto.com.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=12

I get a connection timeout.  Nothing shows.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

anonomous individual - 28 Dec 2005 22:26 GMT
>> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated
>> mediocrity. Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I get a connection timeout.  Nothing shows.

Sorry Alan... In the middle of cyclonic winds here. Pretty rough weather
and my link is only just restored. I'll move it to a USA server now and
repost you a link.
anonomous individual - 28 Dec 2005 22:48 GMT
>> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated
>> mediocrity. Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I get a connection timeout.  Nothing shows.

I moved the picture to a more stable server in the USA.
my own (where I put it) is just for web development and dog slow ATM.

http://www.photosbydouglas.com/tec-photo.htm
Alan Browne - 29 Dec 2005 16:37 GMT
> I moved the picture to a more stable server in the USA.
> my own (where I put it) is just for web development and dog slow ATM.
>
> http://www.photosbydouglas.com/tec-photo.htm

Kind of a cutsey snapshot, a little too contrived.  With an appropriate
caption for Christmas, the usual "gush over cats" crowd will love it.
There is a huge commercial market for such things (with a little more
technical care in the photo quality and the scene).  Seems a little
warm.  Highlights are blown.

I've managed in all these years to avoid cat and dog photos (with a
couple exceptions).  It's certainly not something I'd chase after.  On
the other hand, probably much easier than 2 year old children.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

anonomous individual - 29 Dec 2005 20:33 GMT
> Seems a little warm.  Highlights are blown.

Adjust your monitor, Alan. Unless it's a LCD screen and then it will
look like the contrast is out of range but it prints correctly and that
is after all what a photograph is.

As for the clutter? Hell man how long do you think the drug would last?
That was one killer scene to arrange and now you tell me it's cluttered?

This colour thing is what happens when you let a Canon DSLR
make it's own exposure and white balance calculations.
I'm not on a crusade against Canon either. They really cannot handle
auto white balance. Even this new 5D cannot accurately balance it's own
colour.

It can't easily handle rapid change in light intensity either. If you
take a shot (AE exposure - 1/650th speed) in bright daylight and then
turn the camera to an inside scene (1/90th), the first picture shot in
the darker scene will be out of focus. OK for the second one and yes,
the camera confirms focus but doesn't pull it. Same on a 1D Mk II.
Something to do with the infra red beam used to grab focus, another
Photographer told me.

I can't remember exactly but I think it was a 10D or
maybe a 20D picture. Anyway, it's one of my older stock,
still in the catalogue but no longer revenue positive. I might do the
Brett thing next year and fill up a Pbase server with all my redundant
stock pics just so all you critics can have a field day or two.

Signature

Squeak up or shut up.
Anonymouse

chrlz@go.com - 30 Dec 2005 00:03 GMT
Alan> Seems a little warm.  Highlights are blown.
Douglas>Adjust your monitor, Alan. Unless it's a LCD screen and..

Douglas, what is it about blown highlights that you just don't get??
Check the h i s t o g r a m, that's HISTOGRAM.  The highlights *are*
blown, and if they are not blown in the original, then your
post-processing is at fault. It's nothing to do with the monitor -
whack an eyedropper over the whites in the hat, the phone, the
papers... 255, 255, 255, 255, 255, ...  And for further proof, the
closest to a black is in the 50's..  It's simply overexposed.

Douglas>..but it prints correctly and that is after all what a
photograph is.

Maybe it prints 'correctly', if all you have ever seen is one-hour
processing.  It *could* have been a nice pic..

Ah well, I guess the cat was just moving way too fast for Douglas to
actually shoot it properly. You know what it is like when you are a
photojournalist like Doug - everything happens in an instant - dodging
crossfire, high winds, teeming rain/sleet/snow.... (O:
Alan Browne - 30 Dec 2005 00:38 GMT
>> Seems a little warm.  Highlights are blown.
>>
> Adjust your monitor, Alan. Unless it's a LCD screen and then it will
> look like the contrast is out of range but it prints correctly and that
> is after all what a photograph is.

Monitor is fine, thanks.  But the left side of your image where the
"white" phone looks a dull beige suggests it is warm.

> As for the clutter? Hell man how long do you think the drug would last?
> That was one killer scene to arrange and now you tell me it's cluttered?

Basket rear left?

> It can't easily handle rapid change in light intensity either. If you
> take a shot (AE exposure - 1/650th speed) in bright daylight and then
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Something to do with the infra red beam used to grab focus, another
> Photographer told me.

Manual focus.

> I can't remember exactly but I think it was a 10D or
> maybe a 20D picture. Anyway, it's one of my older stock,
> still in the catalogue but no longer revenue positive. I might do the
> Brett thing next year and fill up a Pbase server with all my redundant
> stock pics just so all you critics can have a field day or two.

You can't afford me.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.

anonomous individual - 28 Dec 2005 22:49 GMT
>> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated
>> mediocrity. Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> I get a connection timeout.  Nothing shows.

I moved the picture to a more stable server in the USA.
my own (where I put it) is just for web development and dog slow ATM.

http://www.photosbydouglas.com/tec-photo.htm
Annika1980 - 29 Dec 2005 15:37 GMT
Not a bad shot except for the background distraction.  Take out the
basket and put something else there like a picture of Santa Paws.
no_name - 29 Dec 2005 16:55 GMT
> The king of mediocrity - Bret Douglas recently said he hated mediocrity.
> Me too but despite that, I still look at his pictures :-)
>
> So here's one of mine.
> http://tecphoto.com.au/gallery2/main.php?g2_view=core.ShowItem&g2_itemId=12

Not Found

The requested URL /gallery2/main.php was not found on this server.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.