 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / October 2005THE RETURN OF FILM ???
Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 But don't get too excited, cause I am ...... -Annika -----> Totally Digital !!! > Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > > But don't get too excited, cause I am ...... > > -Annika -----> Totally Digital !!! Liar! If this were true, you couldn't have shot this picture, and you wouldn't be posting about using film to archive your shots. :-) > Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > > But don't get too excited, cause I am ...... > > -Annika -----> Totally Digital !!! Film rules. Nice portrait, by the way.  SignatureDD (everything is temporary) www.dallasdahms.com > Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > > But don't get too excited, cause I am ...... > > -Annika -----> Totally Digital !!! Much nicer than your other samples. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio <http://www.allgstudio.com> >> Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 >Much nicer than your other samples. Aw, you're just saying that cause you're Totally Analog! Actually, I was happy with the way the Astia scans turned out (at least the ones I've done so far). I was less happy with the amount of time and work needed to get them to look decent. I don't how you darkroom guys do it. > >> Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > and work needed to get them to look decent. I don't how you darkroom > guys do it. It's a labour of love. SignatureDD (everything is temporary) www.dallasdahms.com > >> Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > > >Much nicer than your other samples. > > Aw, you're just saying that cause you're Totally Analog! Actually, I am not. Last rental item was a Contax 645 with a PhaseOne back. Of course, I cannot justify buying such a set-up, so I rent whenever a client wants something like that. > Actually, I was happy with the way the Astia scans turned out (at least > the ones I've done so far). I was less happy with the amount of time > and work needed to get them to look decent. Problems with the lab, or lack of a good lab close to you? > I don't how you darkroom > guys do it. I have been doing what you guys like to call "digital darkroom" since late 1994. I can state without any doubt that I know far more about that than the vast majority of people on this newsgroup. In fact, I don't even have a chemical darkroom. The majority of my images are scanned then commercially printed. My fine art images are chemical printed, but by a lab using a high level scanning set-up. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio <http://www.allgstudio.com> >> Actually, I was happy with the way the Astia scans turned out (at least >> the ones I've done so far). I was less happy with the amount of time >> and work needed to get them to look decent. >Problems with the lab, or lack of a good lab close to you? No, the lab I use is great .... two hour service. The time-consuming part is scanning the slides with my 5400. > >> Actually, I was happy with the way the Astia scans turned out (at least > >> the ones I've done so far). I was less happy with the amount of time [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > No, the lab I use is great .... two hour service. > The time-consuming part is scanning the slides with my 5400. Unfortunately true. One would need to spend quite a bit to get speed and very high quality scans. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio <http://www.allgstudio.com> >Much nicer than your other samples. I added a few of my slide shots to my soccer gallery at: http://www.pbase.com/bret/soccer I may even shoot a couple of rolls at this weekend's air show featuring the Blue Angels and the F-104 Starfighter. > Film makes a minor comeback, courtesy of the Fabulous EOS-1V. > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 A tad under exposed? Signature-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 >A tad under exposed? Hmmmm, maybe so ..... let me check the EXIF data. Oh sh.t, it's gone! Oh well, better under than over with slide film I suppose. >>>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Oh well, better under than over with slide film I suppose. The histogram is fine for the white shirt, a crooked curve in PS could lighten the face & background though & maybe even darken the deepest shadows a tad. Is this one digital? http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51076385 In the film one, you can't tell his tie is blue. SignaturePaul Furman http://www.edgehill.net/1 Bay Natives http://www.baynatives.com > Hmmmm, maybe so ..... let me check the EXIF data. > Oh sh.t, it's gone! Ain't the only thing that's gone what happened to my comment? you censored it? how Republican of you. > >> http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Oh well, better under than over with slide film I suppose. > Hmmmm, maybe so ..... let me check the EXIF data. > Oh sh.t, it's gone! >Ain't the only thing that's gone what happened to my comment? you censored >it? how Republican of you. If you have some comments then make them here or in e-mail. I'm sure the Chambliss family has no interest in your rantings. >I'm sure the Chambliss family has no interest in your rantings. In that case you should make the gallery private and give them a password for it, why make it public, point it out on a newsgroup and invite comments? > > Hmmmm, maybe so ..... let me check the EXIF data. > > Oh sh.t, it's gone! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > If you have some comments then make them here or in e-mail. I'm sure > the Chambliss family has no interest in your rantings. >>I'm sure the Chambliss family has no interest in your rantings. >In that case you should make the gallery private and give them a password >for it, why make it public, point it out on a newsgroup and invite comments? Nah, I like to keep it simple. Besides, if I did that you couldn't spend hours enjoying my pics and in no time you'd be back to take those dreadful self-portraits of yours. > Nah, I like to keep it simple. Really, and I just thought you were constantly seeking the approval of others. > >>I'm sure the Chambliss family has no interest in your rantings. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > spend hours enjoying my pics and in no time you'd be back to take those > dreadful self-portraits of yours. >>>http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/51226512 > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > Oh well, better under than over with slide film I suppose. It could also be well exposed and badly scanned ... |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.