In Canon's MTF charts, what do the blue, black and gray lines indicate?
I have no experience reading them, but kinda understand Photodo.
Presumably solid lines show saggital MTF and dotted lines show tangential.
Thanks in advance.
David Littlewood - 25 Aug 2005 20:42 GMT
In article <430df7c2@news.meer.net>, Bill Tuthill <can@spam.co> writes
>In Canon's MTF charts, what do the blue, black and gray lines indicate?
>I have no experience reading them, but kinda understand Photodo.
In the "EF Lens Work" book, black is MTF at maximum aperture for the
lens, blue at f/8. Thick black/blue line is MTF at 10 lines/mm, thin
line at 30 lines/mm.
>Presumably solid lines show saggital MTF and dotted lines show tangential.
Yes.
I can't be sure that the same protocol is followed in whatever you are
looking at, but it seems likely there would be some consistency. I
imagine that the grey lines you see may be the thin black ones. You may
be able to deduce this from the curves!
David

Signature
David Littlewood
Bart van der Wolf - 25 Aug 2005 21:47 GMT
> In Canon's MTF charts, what do the blue, black and gray lines
> indicate?
See MTF chart How to read at:
<http://consumer.usa.canon.com/ir/controller?act=GlossaryAct&fcategoryid=216&alpha=MNO>
Bart
Stephen M. Dunn - 26 Aug 2005 03:30 GMT
$In Canon's MTF charts, what do the blue, black and gray lines indicate?
Blue is f/8; black is wide open. Thick is 10 lp/mm; thin is 30.
Sometimes they use gray rather than thin black.
$Presumably solid lines show saggital MTF and dotted lines show tangential.
Yup.

Signature
Stephen M. Dunn <stephen@stevedunn.ca>
>>>----------------> http://www.stevedunn.ca/ <----------------<<<
------------------------------------------------------------------
Say hi to my cat -- http://www.stevedunn.ca/photos/toby/
Bill Tuthill - 26 Aug 2005 17:42 GMT
> Blue is f/8; black is wide open. Thick is 10 lp/mm; thin is 30.
> Sometimes they use gray rather than thin black.
Thanks all, especially Bart for the glossary definition.
I notice some lenses do not have MTF charts on the Canon website.
Using a statistically insignificant sample size (2) I noted that the
10-22 EFS and 17-85 EFS do not have charts. Perhaps not coincidentally,
these are two lenses that everybody says are overpriced.
Why do some lenses not have MTF charts posted? The 18-55 EFS does,
and that's not an L lens. Its MTF is surprisingly good.
Bart van der Wolf - 26 Aug 2005 21:22 GMT
SNIP
> Using a statistically insignificant sample size (2) I noted that
> the 10-22 EFS and 17-85 EFS do not have charts.
There are charts, but not all sites carry all of them.
This one also has EF-S charts, although you need a bit of imagination
to get them ... (or a web-translator):
http://cweb.canon.jp/camera/ef/catalog/category/
Note the smaller radius when comparing to non-EFs lenses.
Bart
Bill Tuthill - 29 Aug 2005 18:07 GMT
> This one also has EF-S charts, although you need a bit of imagination
> to get them ... (or a web-translator):
> http://cweb.canon.jp/camera/ef/catalog/category/
> Note the smaller radius when comparing to non-EFs lenses.
Thanks again.
The Canon MTF charts show that the 17-85 EFS IS should be better
than the 18-55 EFS, although in real life situations the difference
doesn't appear to be great.