> The funny thing is that the price difference between the 420EX and 430EX
> is very small in Canada. However, in the US, it is huge.
> The reason I have a Digital Rebel is because I still want to wait a
> generation or two before buying a more advanced body. Meanwhile, I
> started buying some L lenses.
Tell me about it; I just got burned on this. Being a Canadian young'un
on a budget, I scrimped and saved and just got my 420EX locally two
months ago. (I refuse to buy new equipment without a warranty that can
be honored by my local camera store. I'm not rich enough to risk going
without a warranty. Besides, I like giving them my business.)
I said to myself, "Canon very rarely introduces new flashes. This has
been the standard mid-range model for years, and it works just fine with
all the DSLRs. It won't be replaced anytime soon."
And then the 430EX came out, at the exact same Canadian street price as
the 420EX.
What really annoys me is that I use a 35mm Rebel 2000, and the manual
controls on the 430EX would have been really handy. Maybe I should just
part with the cash and get a used Elan 7 from KEH. They're certainly
cheap enough nowadays.
- Matt
Paul Bielec - 29 Aug 2005 18:03 GMT
>> The funny thing is that the price difference between the 420EX and
>> 430EX is very small in Canada. However, in the US, it is huge.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
>
> - Matt
Here in Montreal, you can get an used Elan 7e from a camera store with a
warranty for just around 300$. At some point, I thought about buying one
but I shoot mostly digital now and my small ESO 300 is enough for my needs.
$The funny thing is that the price difference between the 420EX and 430EX
$is very small in Canada.
Geez, you're not kidding! The only place I found that lists
both wants CAD340 (about USD285) for the 420EX, and only $10 more
for the 430EX! So the 420, like most photo gear, is ridiculously
more expensive here, and the 430 is actually priced about the same
as in the States.
$The reason I have a Digital Rebel is because I still want to wait a
$generation or two before buying a more advanced body. Meanwhile, I
$started buying some L lenses.
Good plan. Just be forewarned that once you start buying L lenses,
it's hard to stop!

Signature
Stephen M. Dunn <stephen@stevedunn.ca>
>>>----------------> http://www.stevedunn.ca/ <----------------<<<
------------------------------------------------------------------
Say hi to my cat -- http://www.stevedunn.ca/photos/toby/
ian lincoln - 30 Aug 2005 01:01 GMT
> $The funny thing is that the price difference between the 420EX and 430EX
> $is very small in Canada.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Good plan. Just be forewarned that once you start buying L lenses,
> it's hard to stop!
I wonder how much the new 24-105f4L is will be?
Stephen M. Dunn - 30 Aug 2005 03:40 GMT
$I wonder how much the new 24-105f4L is will be?
The U.S. price is $1250. In Canada, it's $1600, or
only slightly more than the equivalent in American dollars.
Another pleasant surprise, though I don't plan on buying this for
another year or two.
Dunno what your retailers over there will want for it ... I
tried the retailer you hate and very quickly got frustrated
by it.

Signature
Stephen M. Dunn <stephen@stevedunn.ca>
>>>----------------> http://www.stevedunn.ca/ <----------------<<<
------------------------------------------------------------------
Say hi to my cat -- http://www.stevedunn.ca/photos/toby/
Paul Bielec - 30 Aug 2005 13:37 GMT
> $The reason I have a Digital Rebel is because I still want to wait a
> $generation or two before buying a more advanced body. Meanwhile, I
> $started buying some L lenses.
>
> Good plan. Just be forewarned that once you start buying L lenses,
> it's hard to stop!
I know.
I replaced my 75-300 (the cheap non IS one) with 70-200 f/4 L this year
and the difference is amazing. Now, 17-40 f/4 L is next on the shopping
list.Although, having the f/2.8 versions would have been even nicer, I
think that f/4 being half the price will suit my needs nicely.
In few years, if technology sticks to the full frame, I'll get something
like the 24-105f4L to fill the gap. Or the f/2.8 versions...who knows?