Hi,
I just picked up a Fujica Half at a garage sale, but I'm not sure what
sort of condition it's in. I haven't tried loading any film yet, since a
roll of film would cost about as much as the camera. It looks like the
meter might not work, and if I press the shutter release button, nothing
happens. I figure the shutter might only cock when the film is wound, but
I can't pull the film advance lever all the way out. Manually turning the
film sprocket wheel and the film take-up spool doesn't help.
I'm hoping the issue is just that nothing will happen until the film trips
or depresses something, and I might go buy a cheap roll today just to see.
But if anyone has any advice, I'd really appreciate it. If it turns out to
be broken, is it feasible for a novice to take this camera apart?
Thanks a lot,
prashant.
birdman - 01 May 2005 00:14 GMT
Its always feasible to take it apart.
Putting it back together and getting it to work is another thing.
Why would you buy this except as a paperweight?
Prashant Singh - 01 May 2005 00:32 GMT
> Its always feasible to take it apart.
> Putting it back together and getting it to work is another thing.
> Why would you buy this except as a paperweight?
Well, I figured even as a paperweight, it's only a couple of bucks. It
didn't look super fancy, so I thought there was a chance it might work.
And it's got lenses and looks cool, so maybe it could prove useful somehow.
The thing is, if there's some broken gear or mechanical connection, I'd
expect the film-advance lever to move easily but not do anything. Right
now it stops right about where you'd expect it to start doing some work.
Taking it apart and getting it functional would certainly be nice, if it's
feasible. But if not, is there anything cool to see inside if I just take
it apart? Maybe any interesting mechanisms or parts?
Thanks,
prashant.
Cardamon Dave - 01 May 2005 02:45 GMT
I owned one for awhile. It took respectable pictures but had a top
shutter speed of 1/300 sec., which was too slow for my taste. I sold it
while it was still operating, and later obtained a Canon Multi-Tele --
which does very well as a half-frame AF camera.
-Cardamon Dave
Prashant Singh - 01 May 2005 04:04 GMT
> I owned one for awhile. It took respectable pictures but had a top
> shutter speed of 1/300 sec., which was too slow for my taste. I sold it
> while it was still operating, and later obtained a Canon Multi-Tele --
> which does very well as a half-frame AF camera.
>
> -Cardamon Dave
Well, if I get it to work, I might just use it for still life or scenic
shots or that sort of thing. I don't know much about cameras or
photography, but I guess it all starts somewhere.
I wonder if the problem could be that the shutter is sticking or
something. Could it be that the mechanism for the film-advance lever
thinks it's done its job, and that's why it won't crank the sprocket? Is
there a way for me to check this out without tearing the whole thing apart?
Thanks,
prashant.
Sid Mallick - 09 May 2005 18:50 GMT
" later obtained a Canon Multi-Tele --which does very well as a half-frame
AF camera."
I have had some trouble getting prints from my half-frame camera. None of
these dept store places seems to know what to do with these negetives. any
suggestions?
thanks
Sid
Scott Schuckert - 01 May 2005 14:18 GMT
> Why would you buy this except as a paperweight?
Because all half frame cameras are cool! They're smaller and lighter,
the lenses don't have to cover as large an area and can be less
expensive, (never mind the "crop factor") the "sensor" (film) costs
less, and any increase in noise (grain) is the product of a fevered
imagination...!
Wait, isn't this rec.photo.digital?
--------------------------------------------
Seriously, there's a certain charm in playing with odd technological
offshoots like this. I used to shoot a lot of portraits, and 1/2
frames' vertical format tickled me; I used to load the old Ilford
72-frame film and shoot 144 times before reloading...
Peter Chant - 03 May 2005 18:45 GMT
> Seriously, there's a certain charm in playing with odd technological
> offshoots like this. I used to shoot a lot of portraits, and 1/2
> frames' vertical format tickled me; I used to load the old Ilford
> 72-frame film and shoot 144 times before reloading...
Did that have an extra thin film base? Are you the guy who bought the 100'
backs for the old Pentax's?

Signature
http://www.petezilla.co.uk
barronchung - 30 Oct 2005 17:04 GMT
Prashant Singh Wrote:
> Hi,
> It looks like the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> to
> be broken, is it feasible for a novice to take this camera apart?
I just took one of these apart for some cleaning... the shutter shoul
cock when you wind it, whether or not there's film inside. Mayb
something is jammed in the wind mechanism, like a spring is in th
wrong place or a screw fell out and is stuck somewhere where i
shouldn't be. Don't force it, it should work naturally. If the leve
can't be wound, maybe it's already cocked, and something is preventin
it from being tripped. You could always take it apart and manually tri
the shutter. Maybe that will get it working. You'll have to peel bac
some of the plastic to get at the screws to open the front pane
however, so have some contact cement on hand to reglue it when you'r
done. I found instructions at this site (in Japanese, but you ca
translate it in Google):
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~rd2h-ari/BUN_FUHA.htm
http://tinyurl.com/au3cq
If you have any specific questions, I *might*be able to help, but I'm
novice as well so... Good luck!
by
--
barronchung
degaon - 24 Oct 2007 04:51 GMT
>Prashant Singh Wrote:
>> Hi,
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>--
>barronchung
Hello Prashant
Can you still remember how you took the Fujica Half apart ??
I need some help and the link you gave is not very clear
The meter on my Fujica half reads low and I wonder if anything can be done
to bring it up to par.
Also the viewfinder is dirty and needs cleaning
I see no easy (read conventional) way to get the top (or for that matter the
bottom) covers off
Can you help ?
Thanks
David Gaon