Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Upgrade to Nikon F6 from F100?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
ar-fr - 28 Sep 2004 17:32 GMT
Hi,

Would it make sense to upgrade to a Nikon F6 from an F100? I'm not a
professional and I'm using the F100 for general photography.

I also have the FM2 and following lenses:
MF 24mm f/2.8
MF 50mm f/1.8
AF 35mm f/2.0
AF-S 24-85mm
AF-D 80-200mm f/2.8 (latest version)

Is the F6 more compatible with the MF lenses than the F100 (metering)? I
suppose so... I'm still interested in buying MF lenses (example: 105mm
f/2.5).

I also have the SB-28 flash.

Thanks in advance!
Roger - 28 Sep 2004 17:54 GMT
The F6 on paper is a great sounding camera. The most significant
feature you would be gaining over the F100 is the color matrix
metering for all your lenses. If you shoot significantly with the
vertical grip, you would also be gaining a lot of convenience with the
F6 vertical grip over the F100 grip. For your AF lenses you gain the
color aspect of the matrix metering and for your MF lenses you gain
significantly as in matrix and color matrix metering.

I have both an F5 and F100 and for me the F6 integrates the best of
both and throws in the significant features from the D2* series. The
features that I would use significantly on the F6 are those on the
vertical grip; plus the updated metering and the full featured use of
MF lenses.

I especially like the ability to assign the exposure compensation on
the F100 to the command wheel (the F5 doesn't have that feature).
However, that said I don't use exposure compensation nearly so much
with the F5 as with the F100, the F5 meter is better. So I think that
would be one of my most used features on the F100 that wouldn't be as
necessary on "upgrading" to the F6.

You also gain in the frames per second department.

You will have to research the feature compatibility of the SB-28
further. I don't know much about the backward compatibility in the
strobe department. If you find out, please post. I'm currently using a
SB-80dx and it works well with the F100/F5.

My spouse is pushing any further investments towards digital, however
I'm really drawn to the F6.

Regards,
Roger

>Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
>Thanks in advance!
William Graham - 28 Sep 2004 21:47 GMT
> I especially like the ability to assign the exposure compensation on
> the F100 to the command wheel (the F5 doesn't have that feature).

I don't understand this.....I change my EC all the time with the thumb wheel
just behind the trigger button....(You have to press a button labeled +/- on
top while you do this, which assigns it to that wheel) Once it's set, it
will not change, even if you turn the camera off, and back on again. You
will have to use the wheel to change it back. It is a control I use on my F5
all the time.....
Alex Wilde - 30 Sep 2004 03:27 GMT
>> I especially like the ability to assign the exposure compensation on
>> the F100 to the command wheel (the F5 doesn't have that feature).
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>will have to use the wheel to change it back. It is a control I use on my F5
>all the time.....

On the F100, you can do this, just the same, without pressing the +/-
button. It's not that big a deal.
Signature

Alex Wilde
Motor Sport Photography -
http://www.cizeta.demon.co.uk

Roger - 30 Sep 2004 15:18 GMT
>>> I especially like the ability to assign the exposure compensation on
>>> the F100 to the command wheel (the F5 doesn't have that feature).
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>On the F100, you can do this, just the same, without pressing the +/-
>button. It's not that big a deal.

I find it is that big of a deal for me, especially with MF lenses and
center weighted or spot metering. I have the +/- control when needed
for multiple exposure under similar lighting but also having complete
control on a per exposure basis under fast changing conditions with
everything displayed in the VF. Coupled with the exposure toggle lock
and the wheel, it's a very versatile arrangement that the F5 can offer
only with the +/- dial and constant pressure on the exposure lock.

Using these features on the F100, you can shift the sensitive CW or
spot exposure area off the main subject and lock with the AE lock
(toggle) and then compensate during recomposing if necessary. There
are many other ways to manage this [even turn it off], but I find it
very convenient and miss the versatility on my F5.

However, that said, I do have fewer problems with the metering on the
F5 than on the F100. In high contrast situations and in low light, the
F100 seems to be biased towards the use of strobe. The F5 doesn't seem
to have that bias and I find myself using compensation much less
frequently.

Regards,
Roger
Alan Browne - 28 Sep 2004 18:07 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> I also have the SB-28 flash.

It might make more sen$e to wait and see if the rumored F105/F200 (whatever it
is and whatever it ends up being named) comes out in the next while.  Not sure
about the metering with older lenses in the F6 or the rumored camera.

Cheers,
Alan

Signature

-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--

Michael Benveniste - 29 Sep 2004 01:13 GMT
>Is the F6 more compatible with the MF lenses than the F100 (metering)?

Like the D2H and D2X, you get matrix metering with AI and AI-S lenses
on the F6.

Signature

Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419.  Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.

Dallas - 29 Sep 2004 19:16 GMT
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Thanks in advance!

I would never recommend a body upgrade for anyone who doesn't need one. I
wasn't aware that the F100 can't meter with MF lenses, which totally
sucks, but looking at your lens collection, I would say that if you wanted
a Nikon that can take pretty much any Nikkor lens, you should be looking
at a used F4.

With an AF-S lens on the F4, AF is not a problem, but the real benefit of
using this body is that you can mount and use pre-AI and AI lenses without
any problems. You can even use G lenses in P, Ph and S modes.

The body offers everything a Nikon shooter could ever want, from high FPS,
to 1/8000sec shutter speeds, matrix metering (even with AI lenses), a
boatload of accessories - most notably the MF-23 back, interchangeable
screens and prisms, plus a couple of drive options as well. I have a ML-1
remote control unit for the body that has a range of 60m, plus a remote
trigger that attaches with a cable. If you don't have those then you can
use an ordinary screw in release with the F4s drive option.

I've never owned a more adaptable Nikon body. Long live the F4!!!

BTW, I recently did a roll of slides in my studio with the F4s and the
105mm f/2.5 AI. Wow! That lens rocks!

Signature

DD™                        

"And that's all I got to say about that" ~ FG

Jim MacKenzie - 29 Sep 2004 20:49 GMT
> I wasn't aware that the F100 can't meter with MF lenses, which totally
> sucks, but looking at your lens collection, I would say that if you wanted
> a Nikon that can take pretty much any Nikkor lens, you should be looking
> at a used F4.

The F100 most certainly does meter with manual lenses, but only in
centre-weighted and spot metering modes.  You also lose program mode and
shutter priority.  Still, a lot is left and I use this capability on my F100
quite a lot, since I'm too cheap to buy autofocus macro lenses and my manual
ones are optically excellent.

Jim
Michael Benveniste - 29 Sep 2004 20:53 GMT
> I would never recommend a body upgrade for anyone who doesn't need one. I
> wasn't aware that the F100 can't meter with MF lenses, which totally
> sucks.

The F100 can meter with AI and AI-S lenses, but only in center-weighted
and spot modes.  No matrix metering.  You also lose shutter-priority
and program modes.  Ditto for the F5.

The D2H/D2X/F6 family restores the matrix metering option.

Signature

Michael Benveniste -- mhb-offer@clearether.com
Spam and UCE professionally evaluated for $419.  Use this email
address only to submit mail for evaluation.

Dallas - 30 Sep 2004 19:02 GMT
>> I would never recommend a body upgrade for anyone who doesn't need one.
>> I wasn't aware that the F100 can't meter with MF lenses, which totally
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> The D2H/D2X/F6 family restores the matrix metering option.

I wonder why they skipped out the F5 generation with regards matrix
metering on AIS lenses?

Weird.

Signature

DD™                        

"And that's all I got to say about that" ~ FG

Bob Kirkpatrick - 30 Sep 2004 17:23 GMT
> I've never owned a more adaptable Nikon body. Long live the F4!!!
>
> BTW, I recently did a roll of slides in my studio with the F4s and the
> 105mm f/2.5 AI. Wow! That lens rocks!

I second your opinion of the F4.

I have a question about flare (not ghosts) with the 105 f/2.5 in the
studio.  When I shoot a blank white portrait background using a white
background cloth and overexposing the background, say f/11 or f/16
with an f/8 subject, I start to lose contrast due to flare at anything
beyond one stop over.  My best Nikon (and other) lenses may get to 1
1/2 over but they're obviously flaring at 2 stops over.  I often end
up placing black flags on both sides of the subject to block reflected
light from the background that is out of frame.  Do you have a feel
for the flare performance of your 105 f/2.5 Nikkor compared to any
other lenses you have used in your studio?

Thanks,
Bob Kirkpatrick
Dallas - 30 Sep 2004 21:29 GMT
>> I've never owned a more adaptable Nikon body. Long live the F4!!!
>>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> Thanks,
> Bob Kirkpatrick

Hi Bob,

Geez, I'd love to give you a definitive answer based on my own experiences
but unfortunately I have never used a white background in studio! In most
of the portraiture I do I use either a black backdrop or a light blue one
and with my limited lighting setup, I seldom have a light available for
the background (hence the use of black most of the time).

Next time I do a studio lit session I will chuck a white sheet over the
normal background and test the AIS version for flare on my D70. My studio
is actually my garage so I have to move a bunch of things about everytime
I want to shoot anything.

What I can tell you about the 105mm f/2.5 is that it has very smooth bokeh
and is razor sharp. I have two versions, the older pre-AI and the AI. I
find that the older one seems to have smoother bokeh.

Signature

DD™                        

"And that's all I got to say about that" ~ FG

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.