Maybe this subject just didn't want his picture taken, and maybe a case can
be made for available light here, but the sheer stupidity of some
photographers never ceases to amaze me. "Rack" one up for the animal.
The following just moved on the news wires:
YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, Wyo. (AP) - A bull elk charged and injured two
people, including a tourist who took a flash photograph of the animal from
less than 10 feet away.
The 60-year-old Texas man was stuck by the elk's antlers Sunday at Mammoth
Hot Springs, a popular area in Yellowstone National Park. He received cuts
and bruises to his head, hands and chest, officials said Wednesday.
The man, whose name was not disclosed, had walked up to the elk, took his
picture and then turned his back and began to walk away, officials said. The
startled bull put its head down and charged the visitor, who turned around
just in time to be gored.
Later in the day, a National Park Service employee leaving a building was
charged by the same bull and suffered bruises and strained muscles.
The elk also damaged six cars, adding to six it had previously attacked.
Damage to the vehicles was estimated at $12,000 to $15,000.
Because the elk was threatening the safety of visitors and employees, park
managers tranquilized it and removed its antlers before letting it loose.
Yellowstone rules require people to stay at least 25 yards from elk, bison
and other large animals, and at least 100 yards from bears.
Bill Hilton - 23 Sep 2004 03:35 GMT
>From: "Ken Rosenbaum" kenrosenbaum@NOCRAPbuckeye-access.com
>A bull elk charged and injured two
>people, including a tourist who took a flash photograph of the animal from
>less than 10 feet away.
The guy forgot the first and most important rule for photographing dangerous
animals ... always go with someone who runs slower than you :)
Mark M - 23 Sep 2004 07:30 GMT
> Maybe this subject just didn't want his picture taken, and maybe a case can
> be made for available light here, but the sheer stupidity of some
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Yellowstone rules require people to stay at least 25 yards from elk, bison
> and other large animals, and at least 100 yards from bears.
The good news...
...The elk will soon grow another set of antlers to seek revengeproperly.
:)
Joseph Meehan - 23 Sep 2004 13:19 GMT
> Maybe this subject just didn't want his picture taken, and maybe a case
> can
> be made for available light here, but the sheer stupidity of some
> photographers never ceases to amaze me. "Rack" one up for the animal.
> The following just moved on the news wires:
Some 30+ years ago I watched a like event with a moose in I believe it
was, Grand Teton. The fool decided he wanted a close up with his
Instiamatic and at about 30 feet the moose too exception. The man too off
running, the moose quit the attack after about three steps. I think the guy
learned his lesson and paid for it with a laundry bill. Too bad I did not
have a video running at the time.
It should be noted that it is not wise to mess with large animals, and
to be careful even with the small ones. Even the sweet doe can attack and
do serious damage very quickly.

Signature
Joseph E. Meehan
26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math
Stephen H. Westin - 23 Sep 2004 14:05 GMT
> Maybe this subject just didn't want his picture taken, and maybe a case can
> be made for available light here, but the sheer stupidity of some
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Hot Springs, a popular area in Yellowstone National Park. He received cuts
> and bruises to his head, hands and chest, officials said Wednesday.
Sounds like he was quite lucky.
<snip>

Signature
-Stephen H. Westin
Any information or opinions in this message are mine: they do not
represent the position of Cornell University or any of its sponsors.
Jim Phelps - 23 Sep 2004 16:02 GMT
I believe this was the initiation to the Benevolent Protective Order of Elks
club? ;~)
eawckyegcy@yahoo.com - 24 Sep 2004 00:14 GMT
> Because the elk was threatening the safety of visitors and employees, park
> managers tranquilized it and removed its antlers before letting it loose.
What kind of justice is this? The Park should have sharpened his
antlers, not removed them.
Mark M - 24 Sep 2004 01:01 GMT
> > Because the elk was threatening the safety of visitors and employees, park
> > managers tranquilized it and removed its antlers before letting it loose.
>
> What kind of justice is this? The Park should have sharpened his
> antlers, not removed them.
Relax.
They'll grow back next season.
William Graham - 24 Sep 2004 03:36 GMT
> > > Because the elk was threatening the safety of visitors and employees,
> park
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Relax.
> They'll grow back next season.
I remember reading somewhere that "they" gave an elephant a new stainless
steel tipped prosthetic tusk to replace one that had been broken off.....He
was the king of the herd for many years.......
Mark M - 24 Sep 2004 05:05 GMT
> > > > Because the elk was threatening the safety of visitors and employees,
> > park
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> steel tipped prosthetic tusk to replace one that had been broken off.....He
> was the king of the herd for many years.......
That aught to fit nicely up the next poacher's arse...
:)
Jim Nason - 29 Sep 2004 02:41 GMT
He is not a photographer.. .he was an idiot. Wild animals are the
reason we have long lenses.
Mark M - 29 Sep 2004 03:13 GMT
> He is not a photographer.. .he was an idiot. Wild animals are the
> reason we have long lenses.
There's nothing wrong with getting close to wild animals...IF (and that's a
BIG "if") you know what you can do without harming yourself or the animal.
Most should kep their distance, but many of the best wildlife photogs are
the "best" largely because they have taken time to study and learn behaviors
that allow them to safely approach these creatures in appropriate ways.
So... This guy was a photographer.
-He just didn't happen to be wise in the way of these critters.