... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
- Al.

Signature
To reply, insert dash in address to match domain below
Online photo gallery at www.wading-in.net
I.Reject.Spam@my.isp - 30 Aug 2004 20:47 GMT
Archived from Al Denelsbeck <news@wadingin.net> on Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:14:23
GMT:
> ... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
>
> - Al.
Oh I understand all right, Herr Administrator, but I strongly disagree.
Simon Lee's entry is nothing short of brilliant.
Now, did you get her phone and license number? ;->>
Vic
S Lee - 31 Aug 2004 01:31 GMT
choreographed a chorus line of high-kicking electrons to spell out:
> Archived from Al Denelsbeck <news@wadingin.net> on Mon, 30 Aug 2004
> 18:14:23 GMT:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Oh I understand all right, Herr Administrator, but I strongly
> disagree. Simon Lee's entry is nothing short of brilliant.
My girlfriend will thank you for liking what was her idea :)
> Now, did you get her phone and license number? ;->>
The caption says "smoke bomb," so I suspect Rich knows ;)

Signature
__ A L L D O N E! B Y E B Y E!
(__ * _ _ _ _
__)|| | |(_)| \ "...and then, the squirrels attacked."
Mojtaba - 30 Aug 2004 22:10 GMT
Yes, I did not submit any photo this time but voting is not accepted
at all, so I vote for Colin Donoghue.
Mojtaba
> ... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
>
> - Al.
Colin D - 31 Aug 2004 03:58 GMT
> Yes, I did not submit any photo this time but voting is not accepted
> at all, so I vote for Colin Donoghue.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> >
> > - Al.
I'm flattered with your non-vote vote!
Colin D.
Rich Pos - 30 Aug 2004 22:28 GMT
> ... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
Rich wins or Rich's models win?
Hypothetical question of course.
A bunch of great shots this week. I enjoyed seeing them all.
RP©
Annika1980 - 30 Aug 2004 23:55 GMT
>From: Al Denelsbeck news@wadingin.net
>... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
Twas an awesome pic, but only a real geek would be up there snapping pics when
he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
jimkramer - 31 Aug 2004 00:01 GMT
> >From: Al Denelsbeck news@wadingin.net
>
> >... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
>
> Twas an awesome pic, but only a real geek would be up there snapping pics when
> he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
Had a typo there, I think you meant "dis-dress" not " in distress."
Annika1980 - 31 Aug 2004 14:03 GMT
>From: "jimkramer"
>> he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
>>
>Had a typo there, I think you meant "dis-dress" not " in distress."
Thought of that, but it didn't make much sense since she was wearing pants.
Rich Pos - 31 Aug 2004 00:14 GMT
>>From: Al Denelsbeck news@wadingin.net
>
>>... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
>
>Twas an awesome pic, but only a real geek would be up there snapping pics when
>he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
I'm a spurious geek, far from real but I do occasionally play the
part.
First time I've been on the garage roof all year.
RP©
Alan Browne - 31 Aug 2004 01:31 GMT
> Twas an awesome pic, but only a real geek would be up there snapping pics when
> he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
From you I expected "...helping that poor damsel dis-dress."

Signature
-- rec.photo.equipment.35mm user resource:
-- http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch.--
Annika1980 - 31 Aug 2004 05:22 GMT
>From: Alan Browne alan.browne@FreeLunchVideotron.ca
>> Twas an awesome pic, but only a real geek would be up there snapping pics
>when
>> he could be down there helping that poor damsel in distress.
>
> From you I expected "...helping that poor damsel dis-dress."
I considered it.
Bowser - 31 Aug 2004 19:39 GMT
> ... but Rich wins this time. You understand, I'm sure.
Like that took a vote.
> - Al.