> Are we going to see this lens any time soon? I think it is reasonable to
> expect Nikon will come out with such a lens? Any rumors? Regards.
VR will be difficult to combine with the F2.8 speed, especially in a
wide-to-tele zoom. Plus, the added VR makes it possible to do without
the F2.8... simply use F4 and a longer shutterspeed. Why would you need
both? also, the 28-80 zoom-range sucks for digital, and F2.8 pro-lenses
will mostly (or even only) be used with digital.
So: it's not very likely this lens will ever become available.
now, a 50-135mm F2 DX, that would be something...
Lourens
AW - 22 Jul 2004 18:16 GMT
Why would you need both?
To reduce depth of field and blur background!
> > Are we going to see this lens any time soon? I think it is reasonable to
> > expect Nikon will come out with such a lens? Any rumors? Regards.
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Lourens
> Are we going to see this lens any time soon? I think it is reasonable to
> expect Nikon will come out with such a lens? Any rumors? Regards.
Unlikely. Even Canon haven't added IS to a standard zoom yet- but don't be
surprised if a 24-70 f2.8 AF-S G lens comes out.

Signature
Martin Francis http://www.sixbysix.co.uk
"Go not to Usenet for counsel, for it will say both no, and yes, and
no, and yes...."