Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
PhotoKB Home
Discussion Groups
Digital Photography
Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot Cameras
Film Photography
35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther Equipment
Photo Technique
Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique General
General Photo Topics
General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK Photography
DirectoryPhoto Clubs

Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / September 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

[SI] September mandate - "Wide" - 3 weeks to go.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Alan Browne - 06 Sep 2008 17:34 GMT
I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens, but as the suggested mandate
meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
think it's a good one.

Therefore, the mandate is:

     Wide.
         doesn't have to be super-wide but take advantage of the
         visual/compositional aspects of wide angle shooting to
         make the best of a scene/subject of your choosing.
                                     Guilty party: Paul Furman.

SI rulz exceptionz in effect are:
=================================

1. Up to three photos per photgrapher.

2. Dimensions: maximum 1200 pixels wide.
                       1000 pixels high.

3. File requirements:  JPG; <= 300 kB file size.

Send all photos to:     si daht moderator & gmail daht com
                        Do not expect an immediate acknowledgement.

Due date:           2008.09.28 evening, EDST (NY time zone).

Photos will be posted WITH shooter details and all camera detail.
I'm not going through the nut-roll again.

Cheers,
Alan.  SI admin pro tempore (hint).

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

jimkramer - 06 Sep 2008 19:01 GMT
> I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens, but as the suggested mandate
> meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Cheers,
> Alan.  SI admin pro tempore (hint).

You like Tempura, but can't spell? :-)

Macro hummingbirds with a 20mm and some tubes... :-)
-Jim
Paul Furman - 06 Sep 2008 20:33 GMT
> Alan Browne wrote
>>
>>      Wide.
>
> Macro hummingbirds with a 20mm and some tubes... :-)

With your self portrait reflected in it's eye :-)

Signature

Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

Paul Furman - 06 Sep 2008 21:10 GMT
> reflected in it's eye :-)

its
Troy Piggins - 06 Sep 2008 22:33 GMT
* Alan Browne wrote :

> I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens,

That wasn't the intention of my post.  Sorry.

> but as the suggested mandate
> meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
> think it's a good one.

Phew.

> Therefore, the mandate is:
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>           make the best of a scene/subject of your choosing.
>                                       Guilty party: Paul Furman.

Excellent.  Thanks Alan and Paul.

Signature

Troy Piggins
I always appreciate critique.

Robert Coe - 07 Sep 2008 00:22 GMT
: I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens, but as the suggested mandate
: meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
: Photos will be posted WITH shooter details and all camera detail.
: I'm not going through the nut-roll again.

How wide is "wide"? My widest lens goes only to 18mm. I had thought about
buying a 10-20 next year (having blown this year's tax rebate on a telephoto),
but decided to put myself on the list for a 50D instead. And even if I hit the
lottery or something, I'm not going to have a WA in September. Am I SOL?

Bob
jimkramer - 07 Sep 2008 00:47 GMT
> : I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens, but as the suggested mandate
> : meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> Bob

You could always just shoot wide open. Or maybe a wide mouth jar?
Interpret the mandate, don't let it stifle you, open wide your mind.
-Jim
Ken Nadvornick - 07 Sep 2008 01:25 GMT
> How wide is "wide"? My widest lens goes only to 18mm. I had thought
> about buying a 10-20 next year (having blown this year's tax rebate
> on a telephoto), but decided to put myself on the list for a 50D instead.
> And even if I hit the lottery or something, I'm not going to have a WA
> in September. Am I SOL?

Lots of different ways to interpret "Wide."  Specifically using a wide-angle
lens is only one.  Most might not even be related to hardware at all.
Mandates are far from hard and fast requirements.

Ken
John McWilliams - 07 Sep 2008 02:50 GMT
>> How wide is "wide"? My widest lens goes only to 18mm. I had thought
>> about buying a 10-20 next year (having blown this year's tax rebate
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> lens is only one.  Most might not even be related to hardware at all.
> Mandates are far from hard and fast requirements.

Would a photo of a triple-wide trailer fit? Or a very large and wide
person? Or??

Signature

john mcwilliams

Robert Coe - 07 Sep 2008 03:01 GMT
: >> How wide is "wide"? My widest lens goes only to 18mm. I had thought
: >> about buying a 10-20 next year (having blown this year's tax rebate
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
: Would a photo of a triple-wide trailer fit? Or a very large and wide
: person? Or??

You guys make a good point. I'll try to come up with something.  ;^)

Bob
Frank ess - 07 Sep 2008 04:53 GMT
>>>> How wide is "wide"? My widest lens goes only to 18mm. I had
>>>> thought about buying a 10-20 next year (having blown this year's
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> You guys make a good point. I'll try to come up with something.  ;^)

Something about this mandate made me think of white nylon smocks and
"Rinse ... ?"

Signature

Frank ess

Annika1980 - 07 Sep 2008 14:22 GMT
On Sep 6, 8:25 pm, "Ken Nadvornick" <register.nad...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Lots of different ways to interpret "Wide."  Specifically using a wide-angle
> lens is only one.  Most might not even be related to hardware at all.
> Mandates are far from hard and fast requirements.
>
> Ken

Agreed.  I'd like to see the mandate be a little broader.
jimkramer - 07 Sep 2008 14:24 GMT
On Sep 6, 8:25 pm, "Ken Nadvornick" <register.nad...@verizon.net>
wrote:

> Lots of different ways to interpret "Wide." Specifically using a
> wide-angle
> lens is only one. Most might not even be related to hardware at all.
> Mandates are far from hard and fast requirements.
>
> Ken

Agreed.  I'd like to see the mandate be a little broader.

Just stitch a couple of images together...
-Jim
Annika1980 - 07 Sep 2008 22:07 GMT
On Sep 7, 9:24 am, "jimkramer" <Newsread...@NOFSPAMjlkramer.net>
wrote:

> Agreed.  I'd like to see the mandate be a little broader.
>
> Just stitch a couple of images together...

Ah, that gives me an idea for a new mandate that might be fun.

Triptych!

If you get real busy you could go with Diptych instead.
Alan Browne - 07 Sep 2008 16:10 GMT
> On Sep 6, 8:25 pm, "Ken Nadvornick" <register.nad...@verizon.net>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Agreed.  I'd like to see the mandate be a little broader.

So, playing Vegas next week?

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

Paul Furman - 07 Sep 2008 05:37 GMT
> :       Wide.
> :           doesn't have to be super-wide but take advantage of the
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> but decided to put myself on the list for a 50D instead. And even if I hit the
> lottery or something, I'm not going to have a WA in September. Am I SOL?

18mm is wide. Even on AP-S it's about 28mm (eq) heck 35mm (eq) is wide.
My idea was to explore the opportunities and constraints of wide angle
shooting like showing more context behind a subject or emphasizing
perspective or making a person look fat or thin depending how they are
placed in the frame. Those ideas could even be explored at a normal
focal length.

Signature

Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam

Alan Browne - 07 Sep 2008 16:07 GMT
> : I've been shanghaied by Furman and Piggens, but as the suggested mandate
> : meets my own criteria of accessible to all and not overly abstract, I
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> but decided to put myself on the list for a 50D instead. And even if I hit the
> lottery or something, I'm not going to have a WA in September. Am I SOL?

As wide as you can manage is fine.  I don't think there would be howls
of protest if you pano'd 3 or 4 images together either.

Signature

-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
--        r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
--      [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
--                   e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.