 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / August 2008Challenge to David Nebenzahl
Dear self-appointed NG saviour: Please point to anything you've ever posted here that relates to 35mm film. Any discussions you're started? Anything? Doubtful. In fact, you're such a jackass, the only reply you'll be able to post is your standard cut and paste bullshit. This is your chance to prove you're real, and not some basement dweller who spends his life in his parent's basement playing with model trains. So go ahead, prove me right and post your idiotic cut and paste, and prove that you've never posted anything on-topic, as you have described it. Just wanted to make sure before I start blocking... On 8/24/2008 7:34 AM Böwser spake thus: > Dear self-appointed NG saviour: Your characterization, not mine. Whatever. > Please point to anything you've ever posted here that relates to 35mm film. > Any discussions you're started? Anything? Doubtful. In fact, you're such a > jackass, the only reply you'll be able to post is your standard cut and > paste bullshit. This is your chance to prove you're real, and not some > basement dweller who spends his life in his parent's basement playing with > model trains. Doesn't make any difference what I've posted. There's no requirement, in the charter or elsewhere, to have posted what you asked about in order to participate in discussions here. Besides, I have posted lots of stuff relevant to 35mm film. If you can't find it, that's your problem, not mine. > So go ahead, prove me right and post your idiotic cut and paste, and prove > that you've never posted anything on-topic, as you have described it. Hint: I don't use cut and paste (or even copy and paste) for my "boilerplate" replies. Perhaps you can figure out the much easier way to accomplish this. > Just wanted to make sure before I start blocking... Go right ahead. Makes no difference to me. Are you one of those folks who thinks they're actually having an effect on someone by "plonking" them?  Signature"In 1964 Barry Goldwater declared: 'Elect me president, and I will bomb the cities of Vietnam, defoliate the jungles, herd the population into concentration camps and turn the country into a wasteland.' But Lyndon Johnson said: 'No! No! No! Don't you dare do that. Let ME do it.'" - Characterization (paraphrased) of the 1964 Goldwater/Johnson presidential race by Professor Irwin Corey, "The World's Foremost Authority". > On 8/24/2008 7:34 AM Böwser spake thus: > >> Dear self-appointed NG saviour: > > Your characterization, not mine. Whatever. You have posted nothing here except "usenet cop" type stuff. Explanation? >> Please point to anything you've ever posted here that relates to 35mm >> film. Any discussions you're started? Anything? Doubtful. In fact, you're [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > the charter or elsewhere, to have posted what you asked about in order to > participate in discussions here. OK, if it doesn't make any difference, why do you post those damned replies? Apparently, it does make a difference, at least to you, doesn't it? > Besides, I have posted lots of stuff relevant to 35mm film. If you can't > find it, that's your problem, not mine. Prove it. I think you're full of it. A Google search has revealed that you've posted nothing related to 35mm film here, or anywhere. From what I can see, you're just an a.shole. >> So go ahead, prove me right and post your idiotic cut and paste, and >> prove that you've never posted anything on-topic, as you have described [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > "boilerplate" replies. Perhaps you can figure out the much easier way to > accomplish this. Whatever. Use whatever automated style you want. It's the same stupid result. >> Just wanted to make sure before I start blocking... > > Go right ahead. Makes no difference to me. Are you one of those folks who > thinks they're actually having an effect on someone by "plonking" them? Yes. The desired effect will be to never see your name or posts again. It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. > It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when > someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. I've had a great relationship with David since he's resided in my killfile. Signature-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. > > It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when > > someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. > > I've had a great relationship with David since he's resided in my killfile. I'd have an even better one _IF_ some well meaning denizens would either outright "killfile" the twit or better yet, "stop feeding" the David troll/dredge... - JT realizes neither is likely to happen and replies will continue... SignatureSee Header for Improving Usenet's Signal-To-Noise Ratio "The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong." - Carl Jung >>> It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when >>> someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > outright "killfile" the twit or better yet, "stop feeding" the David > troll/dredge... I've given up that campaign with respect to worse trolls ... mostly. Signature-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. -- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out. > >>> It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when > >>> someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I've given up that campaign with respect to worse trolls ... mostly. Sadly, a few of the "worse" trolls, are also some of the better on-topic posters when the subject falls into their knowledge area... - JT has now exceeded his post count for the week, and will now return to reading instead of replying... SignatureSee Header for Improving Usenet's Signal-To-Noise Ratio "The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong." - Carl Jung >> > It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when >> > someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > - JT > realizes neither is likely to happen and replies will continue... No, he's been killed, which is something I don't really care to do. And you are correct, we shouldn't feed them. > >> > It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when > >> > someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > No, he's been killed, which is something I don't really care to do. And you > are correct, we shouldn't feed them. Sometimes filtering is a necessary evil which can be used to improve the signal-to-noise ratio...and yes I understand that you prefer not to do so. - JT uses his filters...and doesn't announce when a poster gets added to it! SignatureSee Header for Improving Usenet's Signal-To-Noise Ratio "The pendulum of the mind oscillates between sense and nonsense, not between right and wrong." - Carl Jung Böwser wrote,on my timestamp of 26/08/2008 3:09 AM: >>> > It works, but I hate it and use it as a last resort, and only when >>> > someone, like you, is simple impossible to reason with. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > No, he's been killed, which is something I don't really care to do. And > you are correct, we shouldn't feed them. Can you two gentlemen stop sharing with the world the intimacy of the contents of your killfiles? (yeeeech!) In case you haven't cottoned on to it yet: NO ONE GIVES A FIG WHO YOU KILLFILED, WHEN! Capice? > "In 1964 Barry Goldwater declared: 'Elect me president, and I > will bomb the cities of Vietnam, defoliate the jungles, herd the [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > presidential race by Professor Irwin Corey, "The World's Foremost > Authority". I am a bit concerned about your sig, or should I say "sigs?" One three-line sig seems like a big waste, but two long sigs? C'mon dude, show some fuckin Netiquette! Oh yeah, they are both off-topic and violations of your precious charter. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.