Human natures are fine tuned for gene pool survival.

The way we evolve in the gene pool is that when we're not at war,
we're in a race.

Peace and freedom means competition. Some people are uncompetitive. So
they don't want to compete. Those people demand slavery.More...

Those who demand slavery are not necessarily poorer or richer,
superior or inferior. Those are people that somehow do not like
competition.

The farm owning farmers in southern US, for example, do not want to
compete with the higher salary the industrial north has, so they
demand slavery. This happens despite the fact that the landlords are
already way richer than their slaves.

Uncompetitive businesses also do not want customers to be free to
choose the best products. They demand enslavements of consumers by
restricting consumers choice to choose better products.

As time goes by and consensual productive means to aquire wealth
become available, those who oppose competition tends to be the one
inferior.

When we're not at war, we're in a race. So in a sense, some part of
life is a zero-sum game. The happiness of some superior competitors
correlate with gene pool survival of such people. This correlate with
the extinction of inferior people and this make inferior people
unhappy....page...

For example, women prefer rich smart males and normal males prefer as
many females as possible. Actually poor males prefer more money rather
than more women, but that's later.

If rich smart males get more females, then rich smart alpha males will
survive better in the gene pool. That means, the other males do not
get any. Hence, the lesser males will not be happy. They will then
come up with monogamy to ration females in equal share for everyone.

Those who are uncompetitive are not going to say honestly that they
are disgruntled competitors. They're going to come up with some
religious unscientific fairy tales to come up with pretext that
freedom, such as free sex is wrong.

In short, whenever someone is happy, whenever something gives
pleasure, happiness, and money, you can count that someone, somewhere,
somehow, will come up with some fairy tales of who knows what that
somehow it's wrong, bad, and should be prohibited.

The preference to snuff of happiness earned by others are called envy.
In a sense, those who want to be happy are meant to kill each other
with those who are envious.

Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success is
simply a bridge to a gas chamber. Deviation from free fair competition
turns life into some form of gun fight.

Not everyone can be appeased in a gun fight. Envy is simply
unappeasable. The way to keep pursuing our happiness and still be
alive is either to kill, or threaten to kill, those who are envious of
us that it's not to their best interests to kill or prosecute
us....page...

That's why I strongly support death penalty. Without it, all succesful
people will be slaughtered by bigots that don't mind going to jail for
it.

It's also the same reason why many ugly women oppose porn. That's
because those women are envy bigots.

Think of it this way. Pretty women can just show some skin and make
millions of dollars. Ugly women has to sexually serve poor males and
get knocked up for much less money.

If this keeps going, pretty women can pick the best males with the
best genes and provide their sons with better education, opportunity,
and more initial start up capital.

The pretty genes will survive better in the gene pool and the ugly
will be outcompeted, like in Europe or Japan. All thanks to porn.

Obviously, pretty porn stars are way better of then ugly wife.
Becoming a porn star or prostitute is then one of the best job ever in
this world.

However, out of envy, ugly women will want to prevent that. What's
their justification? By saying that all the good jobs are so bad that
it can't possibly consensual, and hence has to be prohibited.

They said that porn should be prohibited to protect women. Which
women? Not the consenting one of course. How in the earth people get
protected from consensual offers anyway. It's there to protect
disgruntled envy competitors.