Yeah, that's why in the original post in this thread you couldn't
resist jabbing me and mentioning your Annika1980.com website, which is
still active.  If you truly have no interest in me anymore take that
site down and we can end this whole thing.  That should leave you
plenty of time to focus on many of your other perceived enemies ....
Mark Thomas, Mark Morgan, Alan Browne, Tony Polson, Colin,
PixelPix, .... its a long list.

Otherwise, quit your bitching and your lying and continue to get what
you get.  It matters not to me .... I'll still be out there taking
pics every day.

Hi Pud.
Despite what you might think, I have no issue anymore with anyone
making comments about the technical merits or lack of them in my
photos. Many are after all intended to invoke people's opinions. My
only issue with anyone is when they start personal criticism and
Insults without ever having met me or known anything about me.
Mark.Thomas.7 is his own worst enemy in that regard. He seeks peer
acceptance and can't get it because he doesn't deserve it. This makes
him the nasty bastard you come across in the groups.

He has every right to pass the comments on photos anyone posts. He has
absolutely no right to pass comment on anything else about me, my
wife, my daughter or my business activities, which are totally legal,
correctly incorporated and registered with the Australian Taxation
Office and every other Government department with an interest in what
I do. Although he would dearly love to know what I've done to conceal
this from him. His barbs aimed at getting a response are wasted, he'll
never get another one from me.

What I've done is what every working Photographer in Australia is
doing or will do soon, thanks to the activities of idle minded idiots
like him and the sheep who chime in. I can't see any of the sheep's
posts but I see replies to them by people like yourself. Reference to
over saturated colours goes into an are of "What use for the picture"
which he has no knowledge of so any comment he makes is pure
speculation. Compositional comments have no validity either, unless a
wider view of the scene is available for assessment and of course
composition is what separates all photographers. If he wishes all of
us to comply with his version of what a scene should look like, he
probably ought to take it up with John Howard and George Bush so they
can legislate for proper composition of photographs displayed on the
Internet.

For me? I'll reply to polite and or civil people and do my best to
reply in the same way. I've just used "Grease Monkey" to create some
scripts to control how I see newsgroups and he, along with a couple of
other people I'd rather never know, can say what they like about my
posts. If their comments are of any worth, I'll pick up on them when
someone else replies.

Doug