> Sigma last year introduced a really sweet rival for Canon's 70 -200
> F2.8 white monster.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> JA
Putting a Smegma lens on a 5D ..... that's just so wrong!
> http://www.ryadia.com/POD/July/13-07-07.htm
Nice shot! What kind of plant is that?
Julian. - 17 Jul 2007 23:05 GMT
>> http://www.ryadia.com/POD/July/13-07-07.htm
>
> Nice shot! What kind of plant is that?
I think it's a weed. It was growing on the beachfront.

Signature
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Willarojo - 18 Jul 2007 02:45 GMT
"Julian." <critical@the.end> vehemently accused in news:469d3118$0
$22967$88260bb3@free.teranews.com:
>>> http://www.ryadia.com/POD/July/13-07-07.htm
>>
>> Nice shot! What kind of plant is that?
>
> I think it's a weed. It was growing on the beachfront.
Looks like the colorful "weedus julianus". Impossible to kill,
smells like sweaty feet, only grows in Australia... but don't blame
Australia for that.
Willa

Signature
http://www.pbase.com/willarojo
“I came into this world, not chiefly to make this a good place to
live in, but to live in it, be it good or bad.”
Thoreau, Civil Disobedience
“We are in great haste to construct a magnetic telegraph line from
Maine to Texas; but Maine and Texas, it may be, have nothing
important to communicate.”
Thoreau, Walden
******
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delusional_disorder
William Graham - 18 Jul 2007 03:52 GMT
>>> http://www.ryadia.com/POD/July/13-07-07.htm
>>
>> Nice shot! What kind of plant is that?
>
> I think it's a weed. It was growing on the beachfront.
I think a weed is anything growing in your garden that you don't want. One
man's weed is another's beautiful flower........:^)
> Sigma last year introduced a really sweet rival for Canon's 70 -200
> F2.8 white monster.
> No IS but a really great macro facility, very well suited to a 5D.
>
> http://www.ryadia.com/POD/July/13-07-07.htm
I'm afraid I have a good memory, "Julian".
*Douglas* posted this one many moons ago as one of HIS... I might
just check my archives.... Yup. It USED to be here (http://
www.weprint2canvas.com/gallery/albums/flowers/hard_worker_full.jpg)
..but now Douglas has pulled that whole site down, so there isn't much
point looking for it..
It was discussed here:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/rec.photo.equipment.35mm/tree/browse_frm/threa
d/e2c3f2d8a16e740
where "D.Mac" posted a link to it on July 25. Douglas later had an
argument with DD over whether it was flash lit. Strangely, I'm
inclined to agree with Douglas - it doesn't look flashlit to me,
although it is Rockwellianly saturated and has some very odd edge
defects...
So obviously it was Douglas' image, and it was taken a LONG time ago.
BUSTED again, Julian/Douglas - more lies.
> I've been out playing!
Um, yes, it does seem so.