 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| PhotoKB HomeDiscussion Groups Digital Photography Digital PhotoDSLR CamerasZLR CamerasPoint & Shoot CamerasFilm Photography 35 mmLarge FormatMedium formatDarkroomFilm and LabsOther EquipmentPhoto Technique Nature PhotographyPeople PhotographyTechnique GeneralGeneral Photo Topics General TopicsAustralian PhotographyUK PhotographyDirectoryPhoto Clubs |
Photo Forum / Film Photography / 35 mm / June 2007Who does this image represent?
We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. This is just for fun. For those in Australia this means one (1) vote person, not one vote for each of many identities. Any and all anonymous referrals to Bret exclusively will certainly be considered, but only 1 (one) per person. Editorial comments are welcome. www.pbase.com/uw_wayne/image/81179582 > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > but only 1 (one) per person. Editorial comments are welcome. > www.pbase.com/uw_wayne/image/81179582 It's a cross dressing Annika. It must be...I hear Ms. Silverberg saying "Ooooh it's sooooo *fabulous*, Brent Dahhling! Let's go on a photograph theft spree together." mike > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > mike OK., you got your one shot! Now restrain yourself! Lets see what else we get? Common, be patient, lets see? > OK., you got your one shot! Now restrain yourself! Lets see what else > we get? Common, be patient, lets see? It is a good picture. Well done. mike > > OK., you got your one shot! Now restrain yourself! Lets see what else > > we get? Common, be patient, lets see? > > It is a good picture. Well done. > > mike Thanks. It was at the Brookfield Zoo in the Chicago area. She was the Mom. It was a fantastic day! She had just nursed her child. Contrary to the image, not angry, just.....temporarily relieved....I think....and exhausted. > > > OK., you got your one shot! Now restrain yourself! Lets see what else > > > we get? Common, be patient, lets see? [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > to the image, not angry, just.....temporarily relieved....I > think....and exhausted. LOL, Now that you have told of the events of the image, I can see the relief in her eyes. Very good shot. Eyes tack sharp, background OOF with no disturbing shapes jumping out at the viewer. Contrast and color held up very well. Detail of fur and skin of nose well defined. Even with the opinion toward others were we disagree, you have shown that you have the skills and means to create wonderful images. Keep shooting and sharing. I would like to see more from the zoo. Being near the National Zooligical Park in Washington, DC I have had some opportunities to capture the pandas and the white tigers playing. I feel that most of my images don't compete with those who post their links here. I'm still working on it though. Draco Getting even isn't good enough. Doing better does. > > > > OK., you got your one shot! Now restrain yourself! Lets see what else > > > > we get? Common, be patient, lets see? [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Doing better does. Shot was in-doors, very little natural light, it was a grab shot. There is very little DOF with the 400 f2.8. I still had to shoot at ASA800, but she was constantly moving. Could not get a tack sharp shot of her! She and the the child are wonderful! If any of you get to Chicago, go see them. Mom and child are worth the trip. The old man, the Silverback,is...priceless also.The child will nurse for three years (approx). As an endangered species, make the trip folks, it's priceless. > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > mike Whenever I see a post from you, I can be sure of a cheap shot every time. It must make you feel like a man to sit in safety behind your computer screen and defame Bret and me. The impression I get from you is a cross between a crying spoiled child and a broken record. You are a cynical ogre who takes pleasure in beating down anything that is beautiful. My comments for Bret are always of honest praise, because that's how I feel about his work. Those names you seem to take pleasure in labelling me with is so far from the truth that it makes me wonder why you say it. Perhaps jealousy? Or perhaps you are transferring your feelings about how you defend D-Mac onto me? Making you become one of those names you call me. Last winter you posted a pic that could hardly been seen. Bret, out of the goodness of his heart, thought he would help you out and improve it. You have the gall to accuse him of being a thief! Get a hold of yourself Mike? Why would he want it? Helen >> > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for >> > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Whenever I see a post from you, I can be sure of a cheap shot every > time. It must make you feel like a man to sit in safety behind your..... I object! To speak of him as if you are sure that he is a man is highly discriminatory to men. I am a man, and I resent being characterized as having any similarities with the likes of him...."He" could just as easily be a woman........ > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > having any similarities with the likes of him...."He" could just as easily > be a woman........ I stand corrected! You could be right Bill, but I've never known a woman's signature as "mike". I know of some women called Michael. Helen On Jun 26, 3:59 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Helen, think photography, art, beauty, creativity,not the stuff these creeps throw at you. > On Jun 26, 3:59 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > these > creeps throw at you. I would say someone who posted a photo of a gorilla and suggested it should remind us of someone is a creep throwing something at someone. > > On Jun 26, 3:59 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Who is the someone? Who really is the ugly one? Certainly not the gorilla!. >>> On Jun 26, 3:59 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > Who is the someone? Who really is the ugly one? Certainly not the > gorilla!. A chickenshit creep who likes being a chickenshit creep. Must be the poster of the pic. >> <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> [quoted text clipped - 32 lines] > I know of some women called Michael. > Helen The fact is, Helen does exactly as m II portrayed. It seems to me Helen is doing a bit of "Do as I say, not as I do". chastizing. A lot of people when confronted with examples of their behaviour, get offended and attack the person providing the example of thier behaviour. Personally I think the female Gorrilla probably has more appealing looks than most females I come across on a daily basis. That's just me, I prefer hairy females! All mine are too woolly! JJ  SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 50 lines] > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com Actually JJ, I am the first to admit I am a big fan of Bret. I have yet to see a bad image. What is demeaning is being called the names M ll seems to label me with. Such as sycophant or lickspittle. It means a despicable person who is self serving and only praises to gain something for themself. You and the rest of them are dead wrong. I want NOTHING from Bret or any soul for that matter. I praise because it's in my heart to do so. Sure, Bret is a good friend and if it upsets others to see my posts about him, then killfile me. I could care less. Helen On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Well said. Now crtitique my shot! What could I have done differently? Critisism is appreciated. Thanks. > On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 68 lines] > Well said. Now crtitique my shot! What could I have done differently? > Critisism is appreciated. Thanks. It's always hard to shoot an all black animal when their eyes are dark as well. You were wise not to use a flash as this probably would have either scared her or sent her into a frenzy, hurting herself or her baby. It's a nice portrait of one of our sadly diminishing endangered species. What is she chewing on? It looks like some kind of gold wrapper made from aluminum. Helen On Jun 27, 12:43 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > > On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > > - Show quoted text - The zoo puts straw into a large carboard box. They munch on the straw and even throw it at one another as a game with the little ones. They also tear apart the box and play with it. We are fortunate in Chicago. The male has two female companions. Each of the ladies gave birth to a healthy child, so we now have two new families and an older "grandmother" low-land gorilla.The species survival it appears will occur in zoos and not the wild. They are a fabulous animal, I could watch them for hours on end. I did not use a flash but it would not frighten them, tourists shoot them all the time with their tiny strobes. I did want a more natural view but had to shoot at ISO 800 even with a 400mm f2.8wide open. On Jun 26, 5:05 pm, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 63 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Helen, ignore them. I also think Bret does good photography. I don't see much competition photos from the critics. They should post their stuff and compete or shut up.PUT THEM UP OR SHUT UP! > <helensilverb...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] > > - Show quoted text - I have to agree. He could be just as easily be a She. But then again Ms Helen has always been a lady when speaking to these pompus jackels. So she is giving this persona the benifit of doubt and addressing it as He. Draco Getting even isn't good enough. Doing better does. On Jun 26, 4:36 am, helensilverb...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > hold of yourself Mike? Why would he want it? > Helen Good grief people, its a picture for fun! It is what this site is supposed to be about. FUN. Helen, you are getting to rapped up in the politics. Have FUN at this. > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > mike Now mike, that wasn't very nice of you. Ms Helen has been nothing if not nice to those who treat her with respect. Even if we all don't agree with her opinions, we still respect her. Calling her a thief is wrong when you have no proof of such an event having ever occured. So that just leads me to think you have no respect for anyone and should not receive any. But then that to would be wrong, sir. Draco Getting even isn't good enough. Doing better does. > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > but only 1 (one) per person. Editorial comments are welcome. > www.pbase.com/uw_wayne/image/81179582 My vote sez it's you for trying to stir up more sh.t. > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > My vote sez it's you for trying to stir up more sh.t. I believe your IQ to be approx 100-99.05=can you do the math? > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. > This is just for fun. For those in Australia this means one (1) vote > person, not one vote for each of many identities. Any and all > anonymous referrals to Bret exclusively will certainly be considered, > but only 1 (one) per person. Editorial comments are welcome.www.pbase.com/uw_wayne/image/81179582 Now how in the world did you get a picture of my ex? Now she is going to blame me for this post and I will be more than happy to send her to you. I'm sure the two of you will be very happy. Sheesh. Draco Getting even isn't good enough. Doing better does. > > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for > > who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > Doing better does. It's a shame. She is quite attractive. What did you not see in her? >> We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for >> who is the the most likely representative? Pls, one vote per person. [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > > Doing better does. On one hand you chastise m II for intimating similarities about somone and on the other hand do exactly the same thing yourself. Do you have different standards for different opportunities? JJ SignaturePosted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > We have several people who can be associated with this image. Vote for *PLONK* |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.